From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:14:06 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#33428 <33428@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#33428 <33428@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.0.50; edebug-print-{length,level} customization types Reply-To: bug#33428 <33428@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 15:14:06 +0000 retitle 33428 27.0.50; edebug-print-{length,level} customization types reassign 33428 emacs submitter 33428 Stephen Berman severity 33428 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 19 05:33:08 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2018 10:33:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59687 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgrc-0007nz-Ik for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:33:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42762) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgra-0007nh-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:33:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgrU-00008T-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:33:01 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgrU-00008L-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:33:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgrT-00015S-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:33:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgrO-000056-TS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:32:59 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:60375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOgrO-0008WU-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:32:54 -0500 Received: from rosalinde ([88.74.20.32]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MUDXS-1fxqaM37I2-00QyUW for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:32:52 +0100 From: Stephen Berman To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.0.50; edebug-print-{length,level} customization types Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:32:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87o9alcq7g.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:BbXqhQm+qz736FTc0OxFNcoES+kCL58QoTEXAIP5vKeLJ2PNj0V HBfJ0CM4vAGHRsDL+9IiZmQ8MM/TRiJAvkucuvgsIKnwCl0ygyv3gzkmm28bbepqAb5jSCn B+OigNBOqBHyxP2osMX8H5fKhs9gTqb0iqHIP3Mv5mYADoWCjUsBdTx6CCf+aUdo4Id6/oR WDdGemQX2Sn2DfIA3K1vg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:HXnuyjk/G88=:mrAK9cTVPSKPY1m++nEjNS 243m1xWzMOh0+rl9ThoDa7O7ixk7SsLxcQvlWgoXP3dpCI6+IZ8HaPTVb6vOOHNqo2A44Svuj iu0t6avY3ilpBEdLLWxcApSRv3pE7y3NbuEUhJKK4eDbO5WbMgXH1JiKLpusZY5KgjZiuKkZG 4aP57cV7XD3TaMa4yeMKmAlwtHJAwy2Ib5Dhjsdf0btK8+cl1hixRIRBgoxXUOKhT2aeYfzlP Kex3Irps9FFAGjhVnT2OIUnryoSBvjaiYwsOstsA9FKVeISFqcHBDI+kKZpdFG7UNcmIaTb6u WLj9XKPY5SCnPYgJkbcYvuI15B/hat3HVYRI3fWVl4hshXtcHu15Ea+mgWSgyQL0illaN6ASP aZA8Rb3eSj8mjJBGSK4UtDa7bxH/GUUSlK2MpqAQv+KVrbKxzr4RJDsnnfCIVVptYHU//7sYo 03Mn1l0OLNnWiG/L7jwKrNjlv1ljoULdOXphuF2/R9bbuA+GMnrI3dwdpJJnZgbqloAaeoT7L /wiEsjkmJvJPgHjbrYqHc8wa1HOBCykIizk3fmhaQ4aqrcSvOCwLo9jWBO1rhEXMVgBkEXcov oEQtRtuabL3ETZ63eRtKhdw/tDwg7WjbTcWHZ9nH3zQ2NhH1XdcpOrBL3rrMRKsdDBUK2e6jg J703eVPDu3aMh7WQRGcfD10csgF1dgty7/cYmsdhndGblyIT2bX9ggzidmq+181IWMk3iiG9c G1RGv17/ZhcT2STpLa8uO07/FuvCTjbB+weqg4v53zlRVcnRoOzOLjw8WwjqQ1qzqqXcGImDe MtJlDvTMo9/wA92yIDxhMfHa27u2M18Om27x1La6gjlvtCFsfrHO5FN9Tj1Q2xeRy2dsMtKhf aaCLA7/aWfX5DU/x80baUdeDcJLm6gKOwxQB6FNurEsX6jSeTLBN3t/gJUNPwevGb+buTicmX l8qJL63RIKQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) The doc strings of edebug-print-length and edebug-print-level imply that nil is a valid value and indeed it is. Yet trying to set the value to nil via `M-x customize-option' fails with the error "This field should contain an integer", because nil does not fit the customization type :integer used in the definitions of these user options. It's been like this since they were changed from defvars to defcustoms more than 20 years ago (though "If non-nil" was added to the doc strings only a little less than 10 years ago), so should the fix (below) go into master, or is it on the order of a documentation fix and suitable for the release branch? diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el index 15f68a62ac..b50b0383da 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el @@ -192,11 +192,11 @@ edebug-continue-kbd-macro (defcustom edebug-print-length 50 "If non-nil, default value of `print-length' for printing results in Edebug." - :type 'integer + :type '(choice integer (const nil)) :group 'edebug) (defcustom edebug-print-level 50 "If non-nil, default value of `print-level' for printing results in Edebug." - :type 'integer + :type '(choice integer (const nil)) :group 'edebug) (defcustom edebug-print-circle t "If non-nil, default value of `print-circle' for printing results in Edebug." In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 13, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.30) of 2018-11-18 built on rosalinde Repository revision: 5d140800398287c20230dda79162a7c40016d88e Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12001000 System Description: 8.3 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 19 13:37:09 2018 Received: (at 33428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2018 18:37:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32993 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOoQ1-0002Ys-D8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:37:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56091) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOoQ0-0002Yc-18 for 33428@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:37:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOoPs-0004Yk-Sm for 33428@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:37:02 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gOoPs-0004YU-Pr; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:37:00 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2642 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gOoPs-0003By-4r; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 13:37:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:37:05 +0200 Message-Id: <837eh8kj72.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stephen Berman In-reply-to: <87o9alcq7g.fsf@gmx.net> (message from Stephen Berman on Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:32:51 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#33428: 27.0.50; edebug-print-{length,level} customization types References: <87o9alcq7g.fsf@gmx.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33428 Cc: 33428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Stephen Berman > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:32:51 +0100 > > The doc strings of edebug-print-length and edebug-print-level imply that > nil is a valid value and indeed it is. Yet trying to set the value to > nil via `M-x customize-option' fails with the error "This field should > contain an integer", because nil does not fit the customization type > :integer used in the definitions of these user options. It's been like > this since they were changed from defvars to defcustoms more than 20 > years ago (though "If non-nil" was added to the doc strings only a > little less than 10 years ago), so should the fix (below) go into > master, or is it on the order of a documentation fix and suitable for > the release branch? It's fine with me to put this on the release branch. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 19 17:15:29 2018 Received: (at 33428) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2018 22:15:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33136 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOrpJ-0007xj-JH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:15:29 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:54419) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOrpI-0007xX-Lp for 33428@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:15:29 -0500 Received: from rosalinde ([92.73.79.118]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFMEG-1gCiCM1H88-00EQTR; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:15:22 +0100 From: Stephen Berman To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#33428: 27.0.50; edebug-print-{length,level} customization types References: <87o9alcq7g.fsf@gmx.net> <837eh8kj72.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:15:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <837eh8kj72.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:37:05 +0200") Message-ID: <878t1od892.fsf@rub.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:4OL7GfH0OW1DQjj+VSZi2/gBixkuxdShfh/KCsWdF0onAnYXGET qCl1NCMFpeKMzG7z6Tju89o/H3+dA7Mle07wJaPya6Er98lvFkAkj8CX4eRHaV0r+UYNJ13 3ORumZtUrqeLTBLEGbUsDmmNuo4YaMAj+yRZyvLFpql7a8DRInhJV9IW0oFOIxM1q4fA8EV 6vv+J1kR/+lwFGPj3FJgg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:82dkl594/u8=:zZp8ECeASEVHRePphPegWC h402M0zH7odcxS/FVCTgXAsM+gX4+IzqGUrel68SzEadeSNtwtZL6CGZbIMt2XJWYoLcP/Pxl SjffKrlzuQSSdgXR8yib3M+3j3tbKdoAOn5YGtpUOgoOULaLJ0jJhRL3j/YvIl6i8boDN4jfd wTiiu8Tw9q584pPOYYZZhqn2XMwvRvtJLkxH3/evkpuc1n9DVEOhNK81t/XKLm8sSY3HqIaPv BR38oHLIE0xnALczhEwHMYukodODHyiL4qqI39TWBJoVGsukEEW0/XBDjBm+rfCwnUaTejF9+ 9rdKFuy8JHctOm9FIjajGjPkHcnjLuQknSrT3PBvZZM1O7j7rFfiFn+slERo+XM07ZAW+d99T stF5aeZAH8Ctpyz22SiigQufQWp568wnQGyAvrWG7rWpyV85Bx8SCTxb8CpTssC9e0U9BuoRH oy2eHsLuzx+cNKMBCzzIlx/XcktKzO3UG9QjehS7lbjwRnm7lf5niZkmdHavWuCm7+msOGeQI 54ZXsDtEdQWylQM8H29NiHJtx3WoiUSQpUz+iIifEJApxppxYj3evaLIV8EAijjbC3o/YGwxE 1Z4j6m11ifijXN3OzmmlJ6Ytw7CS5QZnb/Gsr8C9hHbMLdDPQAs9sfE2zT68sloulyI5kStbs bvxqGVITj1gyho0GBXB4cUcTDM+A2kUyrk1XNWabwcI2Vdu9kqrah2wY97xDjJLCo45O6nY3T 9joZRdppXKbmXNQw9ips8Hj2d9PRvWcdt9gvPvrMeLDcgoskEQYGySoy8VH6AQmjT3VDSSqQp OuTfgM//2FvBZjhVb/mmOZGvlgrXgRCHj+J54E9kcKg7k1khUmCn+6UnyRUH0641+GAcxxFkY L+jPQN+mxRoJlQbd56QEOf1bwJIAe3gutjY16BmRCh6IV0w7Jnvpp/u1wEpOicRilHEJmorzV hbGM13oOymg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33428 Cc: 33428@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:37:05 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman >> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:32:51 +0100 >> >> The doc strings of edebug-print-length and edebug-print-level imply that >> nil is a valid value and indeed it is. Yet trying to set the value to >> nil via `M-x customize-option' fails with the error "This field should >> contain an integer", because nil does not fit the customization type >> :integer used in the definitions of these user options. It's been like >> this since they were changed from defvars to defcustoms more than 20 >> years ago (though "If non-nil" was added to the doc strings only a >> little less than 10 years ago), so should the fix (below) go into >> master, or is it on the order of a documentation fix and suitable for >> the release branch? > > It's fine with me to put this on the release branch. > > Thanks. Done in commit d667318a7f. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 19 17:17:09 2018 Received: (at 33428-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2018 22:17:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33140 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOrqv-00080b-0M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:17:09 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:46511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gOrqs-000802-8u for 33428-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:17:07 -0500 Received: from rosalinde ([92.73.79.118]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MCLx3-1gFlBF18jZ-009B9m; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:17:00 +0100 From: Stephen Berman To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#33428: 27.0.50; edebug-print-{length,level} customization types References: <87o9alcq7g.fsf@gmx.net> <837eh8kj72.fsf@gnu.org> <878t1od892.fsf@rub.de> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:16:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878t1od892.fsf@rub.de> (Stephen Berman's message of "Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:15:21 +0100") Message-ID: <874lccd86c.fsf@rub.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:MT36yEfEra8VZrH3zCQvKrRw0P1XnTdXo34gIgN8MuO38cKn2/N TzUkvksV0g/NYNVWdeQ07MUhIU5XGtgn7/o6ayU9Ac6JoJW+CH7QkWArBH3Ht2J2g6vDYlC j/2YWWezoG/9cTr3S/pQdlOY5zWFfQf1mLTkQ52SOsDQmsWHBw26M0jQ6FaNg9POmxd3G5y 3/KFenPfsYNNjI3GZtxRA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Jfu3lWWlLEk=:WGQn+N+9oeW/omJJz4tJsS svxyGiDmGJklUfPBoHqicDof1NsNBtj/1HszrHuK6jANPpUNAXyNLtwV+qCm+bc+rUShYDxHl 10/i7vBcvQ5Qwk8YEF9h6p2aD9lOtPdv3Cmsx6VO6g1OI2hrKBOCyf6iRW9lNggBjDO3zUYs6 g7tgbLQuQ2a8MbwmOeT1mvFSsN+9C5QLN/8UQvA+0+4wq4imWHq8xHC7dEcZpJHl2S4+/mzlw Wz9cGCeYtSHFKV7UbDjdW+IfqAg/eLW3KwC63WNiDpR6HpTPXT4mjU8XtuJKbxcIN6OoMp8vy W+WCHfZ8oPrFwQSfcrVBLlS8lyOKOzRV7VkePsZc9lshZ19wQnOasoXhuo+eIvqKKszHqWhBS sKDnnmlH2gRpPVkPnhvQUY7NC7EHCBr68gPcmflkO0z5DlMG3RwiA7Yplf9pVTRvX1np11kqI Uhs1I9TB1QjCyJgqiG2mGF1C6oOmV9WGkIYCTR5jik0SnUFDt8B73Zu2kUGdJstprDlFOftxH 5gUZXDwvHGp2wBo/R1MgZ6PhcPaBJNyfKY22BRgBFtU+9qu+3lKV4uI/LWnZO/cACk0R9Bw98 PxFsBf2X+uMRTofNlis+yUUMm8c9oQyaVwiUlJwkRPhCn5Hhun1lLWDIpfjemKkHNd1GW8IGx Ph4/sL+exzCMm9gCr7hYh1U4echyLVb6BvHUh/+2NTzIOFCwlZe+JDU8Pd7aDJUZEH4gPSw/p h/d3sxSIKeVqbO9DEU8tCWOSwANZINk4AnjyEuVCWKNtL139+IC0XFOFDwh2ivgq/HXojD0Op oP/chNpjVBuTaXGpc/Ypn//G4HJO/XBhBPmxNfdCj5Jx6eYHlJYUKsGQ48X3e4MjWeXgGfRal pPFEWlas1OvgARRkNbGZG7pGjv78wrJX/8VZntrBk4WPvht6vxfZO+F6rrkG3rnIZNy9UZluR m8dHmnGlpuQ== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33428-done Cc: 33428-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 23:15:21 +0100 Stephen Berman wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 20:37:05 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> From: Stephen Berman >>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 11:32:51 +0100 >>> >>> The doc strings of edebug-print-length and edebug-print-level imply that >>> nil is a valid value and indeed it is. Yet trying to set the value to >>> nil via `M-x customize-option' fails with the error "This field should >>> contain an integer", because nil does not fit the customization type >>> :integer used in the definitions of these user options. It's been like >>> this since they were changed from defvars to defcustoms more than 20 >>> years ago (though "If non-nil" was added to the doc strings only a >>> little less than 10 years ago), so should the fix (below) go into >>> master, or is it on the order of a documentation fix and suitable for >>> the release branch? >> >> It's fine with me to put this on the release branch. >> >> Thanks. > > Done in commit d667318a7f. > > Steve Berman Oops, and closing the bug. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:14:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator