GNU bug report logs - #33404
failure behavior for "guix package --upgrade"

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33404: closed (failure behavior for "guix package --upgrade")
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:39:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:31:25 +0100
with message-id <867dojsd6a.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#33404: failure behavior for "guix package --upgrade"
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #33404,
regarding failure behavior for "guix package --upgrade"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
33404: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33404
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Reed Campbell Meyerson <reedmeye <at> uw.edu>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: failure behavior for "guix package --upgrade"
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:37:59 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

I am experiencing some strange behavior when upgrading packages. After a
substitution fails, the upgrade will fail at the same point every time
until I upgrade that point on its own, and then it will proceed until it
potentially fails at a different point.

I have attached a screenshot of the output. This was while trying to
upgrade qutebrowser, but it happened before when upgrading GHC.

Best,
Reed

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[2018-11-15-163434_1366x768_scrot.png (image/png, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Reed Campbell Meyerson <reedmeye <at> uw.edu>
Cc: 33404-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#33404: failure behavior for "guix package --upgrade"
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:31:25 +0100

Hi,

On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 00:47, zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> It appears it was a transient issue.  And since it is old (~2years),
> then I am in favor to close it if no moreinfo is provided.

After the usual 3 weeks, since it requires moreinfo and seems transient,
I am closing.  Feel free to reopen if I am missing something.


All the best,
simon

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.