From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 15 07:14:11 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2018 12:14:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53070 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGXD-0003xF-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:14:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGXB-0003wx-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:14:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGX6-0002oK-2z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:14:04 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGX5-0002oD-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:14:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52883) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGX5-0000Fl-8S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:14:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGWz-0002lA-I2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:14:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:51475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNGWz-0002km-Bp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:13:57 -0500 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B081A0579 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 04:13:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1542284036; bh=n9DxTFfA9xm1rLSvE7axImbHbszaCVhzGlMAaoqJks0=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=g+WteU7OaiHDuaFydAlEMSjXe+Borjr7lz5Pp7KVvuR1H4oqj1pfw3+ULkMPDhC5O Qp4pQPW5mSu/N5zPO2CI4aE5Ohg4pyuvvx3uGSTwVoWRJe/sp5V4QW5xDrxIGHJtRh UX24N2IYCpOtHDfuepOXc4iesfjcvN84Mz8lahNo= X-Riseup-User-ID: 098DF07865E00931A97D95623351E718F19ABF8585B10E252E4F14D710EEA7F6 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 0E6501E0251 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 04:13:54 -0800 (PST) To: bug-guix@gnu.org From: swedebugia Subject: "guix environment" does not warn about stopped jobs Message-ID: <1980a93b-5316-b4b6-4c66-1da8e0af9d2c@riseup.net> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:13:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Hi I use emacs in a terminal to hack on packages. I start an emacs, press C-z to pause it after trying something in bash I then build the package from the source tree press fg to return to emacs and so forth. Typing guix environment will enter a new environment where apparently my paused emacs is not available. Is this a bug? Probably not. Should we make guix environment warn/refuse to create the env. if stopped jobs exist? Yes, I think so. What do you think? -- Cheers Swedebugia From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 23 20:54:05 2019 Received: (at 33397-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2019 01:54:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51854 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZOe-0002cJ-W5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:54:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZOe-0002bo-5J for 33397-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:54:04 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZOY-0002w8-SU; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:53:58 -0500 Received: from [2605:6000:1a0d:6320::6a8] (port=36850 helo=oryx) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZOY-0007NH-Dt; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:53:58 -0500 From: Brett Gilio To: swedebugia Subject: Re: bug#33397: "guix environment" does not warn about stopped jobs References: <1980a93b-5316-b4b6-4c66-1da8e0af9d2c@riseup.net> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 19:54:06 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1980a93b-5316-b4b6-4c66-1da8e0af9d2c@riseup.net> (swedebugia@riseup.net's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:13:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87eewujxoh.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33397-done Cc: 33397-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) swedebugia writes: > Hi > > I use emacs in a terminal to hack on packages. > I start an emacs, press C-z to pause it after trying something > in bash I then build the package from the source tree > press fg to return to emacs > and so forth. > > Typing guix environment will enter a new environment where apparently > my paused emacs is not available. > > Is this a bug? > Probably not. > > Should we make guix environment warn/refuse to create the env. if > stopped jobs exist? > > Yes, I think so. > > What do you think? This is not a bug, as far as I can tell. Especially with the recent proposed and adopted changes to how jobs function in `guix environment` you might have better luck with this issue now. I am closing this in the mean time, but feel free to open a /new/ bug report documenting the expected and true behaviors if you wish. -- Brett M. Gilio GNU Guix, Contributor | GNU Project, Webmaster [DFC0 C7F7 9EE6 0CA7 AE55 5E19 6722 43C4 A03F 0EEE] From unknown Sat Aug 09 13:14:17 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator