GNU bug report logs - #33243
[PATCH 0/1] Update libgcrypt

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Björn Höfling
 <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
Subject: bug#33243: closed (Re: [bug#33243] [PATCH 0/1] Update libgcrypt)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 12:04:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#33243: [PATCH 0/1] Update libgcrypt

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 33243 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
33243: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=33243
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès), 33243-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [bug#33243] [PATCH 0/1] Update libgcrypt
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 13:03:25 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 10:29:50 +0100
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de> skribis:
> 
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:40:29 -0500
> > Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> wrote:
> >  
> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:  
> >> > I think you could be that person.  :-)

Pushed under core-updates-next:

02d83c247931045cf899433223e1b1a51f605a9f

First push to Guix. Is everything fine?

Björn

[Message part 4 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling <at> bjoernhoefling.de>
To: <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] Update libgcrypt
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 18:12:07 +0100

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

This patch updates libgcrypt to 1.8.4.

The reproducibility problem was fixed upstream and thus the patch was
removed from package definition.

I applied this on core-updates-next, was that the right branch?

Björn

[Message part 7 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.