From unknown Fri Jun 13 06:11:49 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#33235 <33235@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#33235 <33235@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Bzip hash error Reply-To: bug#33235 <33235@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:11:49 +0000 retitle 33235 Bzip hash error reassign 33235 guix submitter 33235 brettg@posteo.net severity 33235 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 22:05:51 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 02:05:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59103 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOqL-0004sI-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOqK-0004s6-AW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOqA-0008Rb-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:42 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:36980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOq6-0008Gt-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOq5-0004t1-Mm for Bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOpz-0008EF-UK for Bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:33 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:58229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIOps-00089I-JE for Bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:05:21 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E970521549 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 03:05:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1541124317; bh=z/jGRkYYSL3/1txunAHOpAWHtRh6HTEIUs8sxzKv0fQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=Y3zIpOaHcWTe+21S3ng8Vt3IJut+YDML6Z0Sij9WI2+ZdI4FLdnWZ1QKOklBB2LqM Usm4OcX4uOI6SdCTrIGMff2n7GHH06oJ/mjlCXYrCKNbStgJJKrGLv9PKNJGht2Bgi n+34DFFo6MDjVr0ib0e2ZpXk17PP+MkkGC+LH4rb862YCtvo/uUAI1rakPwKCHVoXi n6azpPi/veSQJ+GAqyeBcaIyAjg0jhoRVZFBygKx5QzfM0t7BE4oJTBhaEjRhu7ODR BxmO9x54DV6GFcbyVqcRj2H4OCL4pjHPmu0htlp+E0NTfZuaX5kKECAACbgxK1pmp/ d2f6TlXVNtBkw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42mQQ42zb8z6tm7 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 03:05:16 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 03:05:16 +0100 From: brettg@posteo.net To: Bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Bzip hash error Message-ID: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> X-Sender: brettg@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) The sha256 has for bzip2 is mismatching on build. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 22:17:12 2018 Received: (at 33235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 02:17:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59115 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIP1M-00059c-DP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:17:12 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:55505) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIP1L-00059Q-CV for 33235@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:17:11 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84692C20; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 22:17:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Nov 2018 22:17:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=CPrrYZ9RW02C3Q6djLO/7v3e MWNLnx88tGKG1op2ew0=; b=muWima/+mNJNJoPQ4qq/lbmay/StlMRSfbmr3Td7 t5RZd3DpU4nnNb7vTaMHHbMbVVwtjL9Olvio3rzuQAMhFTTjo0Zpq6v4qqKQ17pQ ubry0bFkNjNkdctB3mAk4AvUGzRa+AaOgguHMcFjJAzPieZsKM5SCWpAq+zCuGqy sy4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CPrrYZ 9RW02C3Q6djLO/7v3eMWNLnx88tGKG1op2ew0=; b=yeUVWTN3e7Y8BCossA69Xp rRTVfnscoY4psoS17Bv5h+nHRwnOQvu17OYOTgCj58w98V8kH4cdabCr0ValNCRD MSFmSPsrE1NhG7kopEy5l+QII9vTjGul3TDl8jv/1iuihoIfFqGIGIPlDWUt6ewi 2nXe9BgqqjQF66Vl67jUxq8buoSn1gTgRghDsRaq6QZEdnruPwiSFwqPo8pNhvWL 5q1yRlSnfwX8uiJoi8F8NynOHGY2UI/Qf5qDMwG5eJSXTK5tZuuGdPXk7t8AQn10 AGH8TLktES/oceq4S5FjwrbF5xpVX8ve+zomYAVl6x56rdBZo0LqDUuydmqXWCIQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.34.213]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 25C821039F; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 22:17:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 22:17:01 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: brettg@posteo.net Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error Message-ID: <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235 Cc: 33235@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:05:16AM +0100, brettg@posteo.net wrote: > The sha256 has for bzip2 is mismatching on build. Can you give more details? For example, the version of Guix you are using (`guix describe`), the command you ran, and the command's output? It's working for me: $ guix describe Generation 43 Nov 01 2018 13:58:41 (current) guix 361dd8a repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: 361dd8a55644be6ee81f3ccd9e55d2951a8693f8 $ guix build --no-grafts -S bzip2 --no-substitutes =20 The following derivation will be built: =20 /gnu/store/bp0hyahbn3f60b954rfcz0vqlmc7lhzj-bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz.drv building /gnu/store/bp0hyahbn3f60b954rfcz0vqlmc7lhzj-bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz.drv= =2E.. Starting download of /gnu/store/bjpalrv9f49d2k40p7ga0y6dwdys9w5j-bzip2-1.0.= 6.tar.gz =46rom https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184806/http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6= /bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz... following redirection to `https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184835/http:/= /www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz'... downloading from https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184806/http://www.bzip= =2Eorg/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz... bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz = = 129KiB/s 00:06 | 764KiB transferred successfully built /gnu/store/bp0hyahbn3f60b954rfcz0vqlmc7lhzj-bzip2-1.0.6.= tar.gz.drv /gnu/store/bjpalrv9f49d2k40p7ga0y6dwdys9w5j-bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlvbs50ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg7dQ/+J3W725sOLTDEGSz9qTiH4lUjDPU7h7J1D/r59Kf1bLUBWHFYixXPCBBC X3H9ODgF2BYVjHMVyQIvsGN4AI3UoRNFpatW7ybG8YFw20c2I9XcKX/yYy7BbTfi f8kNHzSz8ZkgTHZoSCO1xzswymu9ZvYSg8yw6S2hYn1yUrlrw+R3Fv+4b8fLvkUf UKClse+f/0cK6VxwEJCbN5LGKuYbR69kUlM2009s5+fKq9neYP745XbqjeenMUUG SG8tYoiV0pLlv1RdPtH8IVissSl+Q3gyMJlEJCF8lRLCw2t+5aO3TrCE2qZL1/x1 uDZAQZtuw1gF/oxBX+pmnNhtD02KktUhXI3gjtwXjOz6jStkUpPUFPG4q/B33910 7ds2jQg+IzOjvigeLCRCxiNRtO+7gjHfFkPQaaBPH3Ba0TVvDUPdL0KCQtCqL+kT utT1G8XgAwb98SbdAtoosTmYbdtgjeVr+mRUQ9BrjVe8bMAEDb6rhre++vqJddgW e77H0J2OVPdvjShd888qibZzppqZJ4CLxkGBOIPjTUF0CYmHJ19w3H/W7MsRCO5v DO021shPrd32isXDQ88T+j9BEvoqv514cOct2gTfR2qvoD1cdQNkOjisoRzXzPo1 RtrHiOik9Qs3Re4NXz92GOZTtI/YgNPd8T5tANlXi/GWiDjiBi4= =Tb0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 23:09:41 2018 Received: (at 33235-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 03:09:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59134 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIPq9-0006N1-32 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:09:41 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:37489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIPq6-0006Mm-CY for 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:09:39 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FF1BAC; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 23:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:09:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=80MQFeE04evGBizg4SKUdi+y vIxeuxoXnoMOQV7MoE4=; b=RYLd5N1KcJQAQqXqT8pFHL05B/nBTE3zqGJyzXT8 XvGV5SWrL6bVsDXEWeYqbtS4ubG6yn2sAn2wmJnmgBiVfPBqhb1E8SISElTpuYCP +mWwQDRVXEiABx9xNBsVn6RhLdxyXq/Xu08ZetjsYcH/PMhzwKKNx41xRPiF88La BHE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=80MQFe E04evGBizg4SKUdi+yvIxeuxoXnoMOQV7MoE4=; b=PhpbfAXCBMFaRBgK8nD963 eZ4U/vw81gAoMQn7MaSywjyDlP2cnCkGy3yp4chbTdT1SCJ82y54IapCFE7mZ8J8 32y69DnpFeSlvlaA6OoRHakpV6VYwrHwVif5nSRvsaZjF6A4gjTFTWxfcWKlZ23g A9UP8iI5AnlaYXVOXKSgrN53hz4otesnB7i8c1PAKEf72aakA6GTcJBDhj6KpfRY xr/VN7spIFllizbhNmyiKTy/skmjR9f1CkOuwPcMu6fkM8kKIu6C1szx+iNbXHek 0z6m3/WtMWN/nrhkxyGL/5ToMC+wJK3I2A55/wFLHemPltHZuyKKw3neXevZFKVA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.34.213]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0498F103AB; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 23:09:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 23:09:29 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: brettg@posteo.net Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error Message-ID: <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235-done Cc: 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:29:50AM +0100, brettg@posteo.net wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > I=E2=80=99m coming from an installation using guix init, and am typing fr= om mobile. > I am using the berlin substitutes. I guess my option is to guix pull the > live iso? No, I recommend against doing `guix pull` before initializing. We test that the installer works, but if you update Guix before initialization, then you void the warranty ;) The bzip2.org site is offline; the domain registration expired and the site is gone: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D7598b678fad2112ea87= a85acf755908a59dd4676 I recommend downloading the missing source code from the archives, using `guix download`. For your reference, here is the full URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184835/http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-= 1.0.6.tar.gz --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlvbv+kACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgTtw/+MZPgzgckdDF003QoBuRqllZ3tZVspPu+0qnEHkBGvgFG8ytfX6wQEvbt HrqXvWs4kH3bb4kNyO/n2bDIZFL5DtTK581tEGWIHYrTY4tny47k3uU/bg7TJBf/ WQyqk4HMjkC+Lni8wNZFi6VpdCWjnpQ3Z1qKmD8t7d68ck4GwseFEfCZgDYdo+Ss 2/NnHsxheAYE8lo8fKxBdMPqKwjt8CY3S2yNV5a+PR3McHFw+LYqoSPc02t7m1b6 z90IWcUwaEjcGc1xcLLA/TF576JVoKyT5d33+H+/skYOqA+jfNglZ36rjJiMLRUS aK61E37gFC6z/ZOs8QBVKkeanTXD4gXL+N8r4w7WRJt0s25wEjc2Nmds8kNbA3D5 agE+3flCY5kSbFMoIpGdYQBfprujG9QtVJeFnL6zhuhEqZRI6FEOKfbvOD0bjxTB 3zFT/kOj0jL0ukit+KkdKSCWZbYs+WCGxa8XJla8WMPGm5tCeFvxcCnJRSRu0/Bc QnPAXJojyGmUUUmq47LT2yPcCOKOarrq5c4HgUyYLm42Z2V9mHMS+134jnORADpO cU2QKbGOAxHxBSuoXDNWkyPP+FhsIoj9f6UV4AH/KQLDWoDds1A7/kY2YOM/rBSW IKuv7Bxs8aG7t3bIUp1fdi/RnaK9KYMTQu0VeiLZVAmTBArg7f0= =ibNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 01 23:33:23 2018 Received: (at 33235-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 03:33:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIQD1-0006x4-Jr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:33:22 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:50544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIQCz-0006wr-NM for 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 23:33:18 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F9F8211C6 for <33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 04:33:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1541129591; bh=J3mfqwLSia6icLMu/wBh2cdJnFqzr0mnkNOD83COP2c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=ZF0H9t7vH0wwboUladntGoc9na0IZGG9Sh/2zqE78jCMeXrmL+hfLNTKwEotmXOio fkRB6cn2JVBCP74SmV9NHe4FwFR2tMr5rJmIm5OITRntSsmA+M2Qr1KCEAInpcoNNW NHPIvLaprcCAzKW7pZQPy+pI3oYzMs5dN3JIJwT0U56lA+oS72YdRZcBDJ2crgd+f2 GFt1wg1VRugsHAURaJL+O502K0NLF1T5BSb/SHeEjbKF507G0JfNCNJ2cmCFKIPjaB 5gV0leKcJK9dInXZ5inlJORIcvZfZt2dbJ/UKk7dFthcW4an+bFzJmecdwRJZB/MSq hHPuJLRnvZNFw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42mSMV51DGz6tm5; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 04:33:10 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 04:33:10 +0100 From: brettg@posteo.net To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error In-Reply-To: <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> Message-ID: <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> X-Sender: brettg@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235-done Cc: 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Leo, Are you perhaps mistaken? the URL for bzip2 is bzip.org not bzip2.org Regardless, even when pulling from the archive I am still being given an=20 incorrect hash. On 02.11.2018 04:09, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:29:50AM +0100, brettg@posteo.net wrote: >> Hi Leo, >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99m coming from an installation using guix init, and am typing f= rom=20 >> mobile. >> I am using the berlin substitutes. I guess my option is to guix pull=20 >> the >> live iso? >=20 > No, I recommend against doing `guix pull` before initializing. We test > that the installer works, but if you update Guix before initialization, > then you void the warranty ;) >=20 > The bzip2.org site is offline; the domain registration expired and the > site is gone: >=20 > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D7598b678fad2112ea= 87a85acf755908a59dd4676 >=20 > I recommend downloading the missing source code from the archives,=20 > using > `guix download`. For your reference, here is the full URL: >=20 > https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184835/http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/bzip= 2-1.0.6.tar.gz From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 01:02:51 2018 Received: (at 33235-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 05:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59171 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIRbe-0000mv-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 01:02:51 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:54845) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIRbb-0000mg-9S for 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 01:02:49 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DBC21EC3; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 01:02:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 02 Nov 2018 01:02:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=I37HNlFiZCGs9sfA951sBezy 2PyOjmWftxxsgMBDTpE=; b=t4eeH/4y0d7OqsTUd3fqc5+XGoN0F5HKGdUxoMLS EQkv7VGDpPxtBhkricBMV8t/SEmEEM1YJcjHG23K/LoNnwVEREZYqsDv8DjwXhim 2MNRfzKE/rivCjtekk7HsqgSuBpeZiDS7fZQ3YFPjJa5MzNZOGbphG01rBzz2kGp Uak= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=I37HNl FiZCGs9sfA951sBezy2PyOjmWftxxsgMBDTpE=; b=KISp7Q3xiRmcsiLsw1Pgcq IVRN0/4H1WMQPVVQi3xdluQVrWQxDzSZBLUtqqvJxBYgtv/oe+Lxed+YyLqalLOD Ap6Aj1gXfgFaozUlx+L6Ighym2KNkecwZeoMh3uLcKJwWF/UwYhgZ+dizD30FKjZ dhWZB2mnJ2qH9gVKimyXlAjlke+6MswgKZY7JZAVcRyLvjWCBjmiffPSHx1AfIUq jt/2RccZ7UU0/+YcJ2oCDXV5MyHBacP81EjP9dEyyNlTfIgUjOU4GUBAaYjv39C5 XfrKFQRujkC4W2ii81sboMWXbbjyUBSg/vzhBLYyWCUZtNmcCl2gUwqz+8hRwY0A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CA7D7103A8; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 01:02:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 01:02:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: brettg@posteo.net Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error Message-ID: <20181102050239.GC19599@jasmine.lan> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hYooF8G/hrfVAmum" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235-done Cc: 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:33:10AM +0100, brettg@posteo.net wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > Are you perhaps mistaken? the URL for bzip2 is bzip.org not bzip2.org I mentioned the wrong "short" URLs in my message, but the full URL of the source code on archive.org was correct. bzip.org is offline and the source is available on archive.org. > Regardless, even when pulling from the archive I am still being given an > incorrect hash. Can you take a photo of your screen and email it with your mobile? If so, please show the command you run and the failing part of the output. Also, do=20 `guix download https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184835/http://www.bzip.o= rg/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz` and show the result. --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlvb2mwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhoHw//aDhggRGf/Ha45IwFdedPCyBp3r6gOOUti6Zb63ZQk++xiAO0NO/JVmXO QJ3FhHHINOZyl2G0mt4/74/TrpldorQDb7Sggp2gi78MC70hyvAlnSr0y6W5yXer yZE5RfpjqlMFNkwPx4ul76vdDseLqAecVgFGmwBRV1LqDL7Sq+fumXvhmcxvaoUn d2PO93UD9vV2INqgImCi4cgX9F0PvQrOCZ++PMNvRxQ2XZaM7pWlXsDPZDqa9fm5 E1b+parap9I99ZJO8p0dw7qYVz1s8csBJPrzKaO2ZA/ZTul6Av6bEEG9XS/geZot dA4UBMUQsU8tT6brnJyUCUP8lark3vZ8zRJN6np3YHutJTQ4KixY8Xiib8aARQca so7mRonmOprNsQwkZLrGVpOvKgQ7VRekAO0Z/TpB/+OZ4abIdQcjCk397DOI9vAB WjTJTLQxq8nU5O3Kp0R6uSUpbl+TFfIAytNGVc9fNlKLx4YBbKQ2raREnlYiM+iH EP++v9q6j1xBYvAKdEqvX6EgNNCQjpUW58BhoChmTD4R7ritmHxKB1haOZ64Ovib 7NNXIwY6bmd8OD4/OMCpbxdXUOr6qD69CeWlZwLYVWx7KkmO+Y0y5aQH2Yrq4BP6 FD55oNVpcY7aEepFtt2vltbiyfO51MjUv8WZl1DhvJfBsANg8Ss= =pT2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hYooF8G/hrfVAmum-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 07:07:16 2018 Received: (at 33235-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 11:07:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIXIG-0003ak-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 07:07:16 -0400 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:33994 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIXIE-0003aa-JX for 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 07:07:11 -0400 Received: from alma-ubu (aftr-185-17-204-48.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.204.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07C4C3FF43; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:07:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:07:01 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: brettg@posteo.net Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error Message-ID: <20181102120701.0241332a@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/0H69v_nnNI2sKu1jKcl7FKh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235-done Cc: 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/0H69v_nnNI2sKu1jKcl7FKh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi brettg, I tried with a fresh guixsd 0.15 install and can confirm your problem: On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 04:33:10 +0100 brettg@posteo.net wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > Are you perhaps mistaken? the URL for bzip2 is bzip.org not bzip2.org >=20 > Regardless, even when pulling from the archive I am still being given > an incorrect hash. $ guix build -S --no-substitutes bzip2 --> As you see it, there is a hash mismatch That's because the URL expired and the new "archive.org/..." URL was added in commit 7598b678fad2112ea87a85acf755908a59dd4676 Committer: Leo Famulari 2018-08-10 22:42:01 Which follows the 0.15.0 release. If you then look into the log output and open that downloaded file: less /gnu/store/...-bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz you see plain HTML. Of cause, that mismatches. If there is an error while downloading (i.e. a 404 - not found) then guix downloader would fallback and try to download the sources from subistitute servers or even NixOS servers by hashsum. But as we get a good HTTP return code here, it assumes everything is fine and saves to the store, not trying anything else. Now to download the sources from web.archive.org I needed these steps: # find out path of guix: readlink `which guix` # Then use that directory to authorize berlin: guix archive --authorize < /gnu/store/...-guix-0.15.0.../share/guix/berlin.guixsd.org.pub #Install nss-certs for HTTPS access: guix package -i nss-certs # set environment variables, see 6.2.9 X.509 Certificates export SSL_CERT_DIR=3D"$HOME/.guix-profile/etc/ssl/certs" export SSL_CERT_FILE=3D"$HOME/.guix-profile/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.c= rt" # Now download --with-source guix build -S --with-source=3D"https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184835/http://www.bzip= .org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz" # This fails with a stacktrace "wrong type, expected struc", I can't # copy it out of VM currently. #=20 # Anyway, it downloads the sources and the next: guix build -S bzip2 # does succeed. Sorry for the inconveniences with substitutes missing, hope this brings you a step further? Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/0H69v_nnNI2sKu1jKcl7FKh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlvcL9UACgkQvyhstlk+X/3jwwCbB4iPWNGLBaipZo7fPb6ZAkdM n/wAn2SG9qL6L0oZ50esEIhTiyaVF6Yf =nQ6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/0H69v_nnNI2sKu1jKcl7FKh-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 09:34:50 2018 Received: (at 33235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 13:34:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZb8-0000hD-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:34:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:36133) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIZb6-0000h4-Ps for 33235@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 09:34:49 -0400 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11991A0501; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:34:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1541165687; bh=ZpAbVlpHWhLoEPE+P1p27y6on+8o4+a7GTMfgpRLz3Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fxAEIlTVaCUKwYoaVeRM0cp1joFvtT1Az6Ye4AxKB1ept0TGnDG1n5Av9kt80sssH 6tWcHu8cDeA7Auhxi6mHJISwh+7Li1IedfHQ4D9jOogJxiXo3Gzwiw6p/Jvh7ClYFR 5YBVFW3kAZCYQp5JIkDhiB+awse0Lr99SOTvyTpQ= X-Riseup-User-ID: F1FC6999CE8A11CB23E963A09FB73B0856B0F447A5D4EC3608874614E6A243B6 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 9D2C5640D2; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:34:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error To: 33235@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name, brettg@posteo.net References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> From: swedebugia Message-ID: <893aa3e7-8539-c515-bdd0-8c92da9a5e20@riseup.net> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 14:40:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: sv-FI X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hi On 2018-11-02 04:09, Leo Famulari wrote: > No, I recommend against doing `guix pull` before initializing. We test > that the installer works, but if you update Guix before initialization, > then you void the warranty I suggest we state this VERY clearly in the manual. -- Cheers Swedebugia From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 16:12:46 2018 Received: (at 33235-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 20:12:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIfoA-0003vU-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:12:46 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:39642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIfo8-0003v3-8R for 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:12:41 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ABE8211B9 for <33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 21:12:33 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1541189554; bh=grD82j4W/7Y7sTK9ZDb6RyfgJSYlRwxqvMG4nwHEFV0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=UEx4B4pfdcy4Hy5hLXQ5ODB07ekcAoVRSgEgvKuV3YehFkIbdbZ27+7Q+HwZOqOD2 TgYD1VIR3N6PQ70yj0CawxOYGs9W4LBtlKCgGhhpSFf6VT1CjGxTP5gLkDYpooTVI9 g4oVBn5rVmYqQEdRiQcO1fMJA1ssnHvsUtjnT28YzzO6c5f7KPluTOzzrE3RGxT5Uf M2xNjvhfv39tBs5dQpEnHMPWg8xxM/bH7hoKTdkl5ACVuuSxtbS90Xu/VYQhRmCzGj boGQW5WEAFsjXF2FSIxIJCOhAT8fPx8KX+qXvNzJl3ti2lCWQTz0Hj8SZycPs7jsmO sc9ltBhj0+R8A== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 42mtXZ4qnZz6tmB; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 21:12:30 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 21:12:30 +0100 From: brettg@posteo.net To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_H=C3=B6fling?= Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error In-Reply-To: <20181102120701.0241332a@alma-ubu> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> <20181102120701.0241332a@alma-ubu> Message-ID: <241727faddbe1060a58cae7be9180171@posteo.net> X-Sender: brettg@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235-done Cc: 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi bjorn. Thank you your steps did help in getting it to build with the=20 appropairiate hash sums. However, how do I get the guix system init process to Use that version of the build we just made? It is still Wanting to use the incorrect substitute. On 02.11.2018 12:07, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling wrote: > Hi brettg, >=20 > I tried with a fresh guixsd 0.15 install and can confirm your problem: >=20 > On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 04:33:10 +0100 > brettg@posteo.net wrote: >=20 >> Hi Leo, >>=20 >> Are you perhaps mistaken? the URL for bzip2 is bzip.org not bzip2.org >>=20 >> Regardless, even when pulling from the archive I am still being given >> an incorrect hash. >=20 > $ guix build -S --no-substitutes bzip2 >=20 > --> As you see it, there is a hash mismatch > That's because the URL expired and the new "archive.org/..." URL was > added in commit >=20 > 7598b678fad2112ea87a85acf755908a59dd4676 > Committer: Leo Famulari 2018-08-10 22:42:01 >=20 > Which follows the 0.15.0 release. >=20 > If you then look into the log output and open that downloaded file: >=20 > less /gnu/store/...-bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz >=20 > you see plain HTML. Of cause, that mismatches. >=20 > If there is an error while downloading (i.e. a 404 - not found) then > guix downloader would fallback and try to download the sources from > subistitute servers or even NixOS servers by hashsum. But as we get a > good HTTP return code here, it assumes everything is fine and saves to > the store, not trying anything else. >=20 > Now to download the sources from web.archive.org I needed these > steps: >=20 > # find out path of guix: > readlink `which guix` >=20 > # Then use that directory to authorize berlin: > guix archive --authorize > < /gnu/store/...-guix-0.15.0.../share/guix/berlin.guixsd.org.pub >=20 > #Install nss-certs for HTTPS access: > guix package -i nss-certs > # set environment variables, see 6.2.9 X.509 Certificates > export SSL_CERT_DIR=3D"$HOME/.guix-profile/etc/ssl/certs" > export=20 > SSL_CERT_FILE=3D"$HOME/.guix-profile/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt" >=20 > # Now download --with-source > guix build -S > --with-source=3D"https://web.archive.org/web/20180624184835/http://www.bz= ip.org/1.0.6/bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz" >=20 > # This fails with a stacktrace "wrong type, expected struc", I can't > # copy it out of VM currently. > # > # Anyway, it downloads the sources and the next: >=20 > guix build -S bzip2 >=20 > # does succeed. >=20 > Sorry for the inconveniences with substitutes missing, hope this brings > you a step further? >=20 > Bj=C3=B6rn From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 02 17:02:45 2018 Received: (at 33235-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2018 21:02:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60428 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIgab-0005Mz-80 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:02:45 -0400 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:34060 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gIgaZ-0005Mq-Am for 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 17:02:43 -0400 Received: from alma-ubu (aftr-185-17-204-48.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.204.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69B953FF43; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 22:02:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 22:02:39 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEjDtmZsaW5n?= To: brettg@posteo.net, Leo Famulari , 33235-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error Message-ID: <20181102220239.3852ba36@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <8b7a6f86f5707339261376a1cf5f6fbe@posteo.net> References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> <951ed60730677d567e26ddbdba2e031a@posteo.net> <20181102120701.0241332a@alma-ubu> <8b7a6f86f5707339261376a1cf5f6fbe@posteo.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/ANmLidQX4PnZx9_Yzf7l8ao"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) --Sig_/ANmLidQX4PnZx9_Yzf7l8ao Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi brettg, On Fri, 02 Nov 2018 21:01:05 +0100 brettg@posteo.net wrote: > Hi bjorn. >=20 > Thank you your steps did help in getting it to build with the=20 > appropairiate hash sums. >=20 > However, how do I get the guix system init process to > Use that version of the build we just made? It is still > Wanting to use the incorrect substitute. I don't understand this. When it is already in the store it will be used by Guix (independently of its source, substitutes or self-compiled). But it could be that there are two different versions of it, i.e. with two different store-hashes. For example, one of its dependencies is different. Can you post the output of "guix describe" and the log of "guix system init"? To get the logs, you can either copy it on USB stick or get it with ssh/scp, if you started the ssh daemon as described in the installation manual. Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/ANmLidQX4PnZx9_Yzf7l8ao Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlvcu3AACgkQvyhstlk+X/14JwCePYe9OBeP5i95f+tK6fawaWwL GKwAoK/WQ/66zW78vna30Zdaohx/YUJR =XMDd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ANmLidQX4PnZx9_Yzf7l8ao-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 05 11:22:06 2018 Received: (at 33235) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2018 16:22:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhdd-0004pl-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:22:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:34379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJhda-0004pR-PM for 33235@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:22:04 -0500 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A0C1A0576; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 08:22:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1541434921; bh=S6kEUyBc+/5Y696HtN4CupAbbnY2UalcUZNAQnBTBQg=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Aa78DmDChR3jhZasozBx43Si5/vcdK8u1r9SbYo+mEnFNf8fynsr7XqUgyfv48JpS u9ar6g/8JUPm9BFr9n/ENThqoSVF2def0fu/kjkzF/5aQUE4gfHRVAONiO8UF5IoF2 uoFmeNpdrTiS7TbOnt4/etRPnq6+KM7hmkV4+92U= X-Riseup-User-ID: B91C6A7F238A2B46E209338950A0EC57023D0CA187A6085034ACCFDE655A0C4F Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 0E1D764A5C; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 08:21:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#33235: Bzip hash error From: swedebugia To: 33235@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name, brettg@posteo.net References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net> <20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan> <20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan> <893aa3e7-8539-c515-bdd0-8c92da9a5e20@riseup.net> Message-ID: <8e013510-41a7-4809-70a4-b6698733bbf2@riseup.net> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:21:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <893aa3e7-8539-c515-bdd0-8c92da9a5e20@riseup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33235 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2018-11-02 14:40, swedebugia wrote: > Hi > > On 2018-11-02 04:09, Leo Famulari wrote: >> No, I recommend against doing `guix pull` before initializing. We test >> that the installer works, but if you update Guix before initialization, >> then you void the warranty > I suggest we state this VERY clearly in the manual. Actually guix very loudly warns the user that running guix system init before guix pull will downgrade guix. I solved this by pulling the 0.15 commit and then init. I suggest we tell binary install users to do this in the manual. What do you think? -- Cheers Swedebugia From unknown Fri Jun 13 06:11:49 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator