GNU bug report logs - #33154
27.0.50; create_process on Darwin should not invoke setsid() after vfork() [PATCH]

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Filipp Gunbin <fgunbin <at> fastmail.fm>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>, 33154 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> linux-m68k.org>
Subject: bug#33154: 27.0.50; create_process on Darwin should not invoke setsid() after vfork() [PATCH]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:14:33 +0300

On 10/11/2018 09:09 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:

> Filipp Gunbin wrote:
>> On 09/11/2018 12:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 09 2018, Filipp Gunbin <fgunbin <at> fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have one failing case: "M-x shell-command sudo ls -la" reports "sudo:
>>>> no tty present and no askpass program specified".
>>>
>>> That's not a bug.  If shell-command runs the command synchronously it
>>> doesn't allocate a tty.
>>
>> Are there any reasons for not allocating a pty in this case?  A
>> synchronous program may be interactive.
>
> How would the interaction work, though? I can see potential problems with
> existing Lisp code that runs synchronous commands if we allocate ptys
> for them.

Yes, I see, there's no way to interact.  Without interaction, there's no
sense in allocating pty.

> At any rate, that case has always failed the same way on Ubuntu 18.04 etc., so
> if this is a problem it's not limited to macOS and someone should file a new bug
> report for it.

No need for that.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.