From unknown Mon Jun 16 23:43:00 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#33010 <33010@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#33010 <33010@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Reply-To: bug#33010 <33010@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 06:43:00 +0000 retitle 33010 [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. reassign 33010 guix-patches submitter 33010 ericbavier@centurylink.net severity 33010 normal tag 33010 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 10 21:53:30 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2018 01:53:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAL-0006DJ-M7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34553) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAL-0006Cu-0D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAE-0000jp-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:23 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:42520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAE-0000ji-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAD-0007Pb-SS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAD-0000iE-24 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:21 -0400 Received: from mail.onyx.syn-alias.com ([206.152.134.66]:44951 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAQAC-0000fS-Sd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=centurylink.net; s=ctl201402; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@centurylink.net; t=1539222800; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version; bh=RZ5X2YlVT2FBb8rhsVpLZHa+adk=; b=EPNBQU6pvM2a62Cdx2KMl6EeFj+14rR84cbP2PjpHDAsaR3GgHPTtKXPjurGh4sK dlssJ/GZzPzdrSOyEx82IbiEyXtmbG7r6xglp2BbhGKTOPAOhg4wDr/p9Q0yeHM1 I8/h81uHOqiD/zkJJazmFUKo4MqCRrUrGJ0+0F+nvE8nosxwer0ctJoECIX4gkis MV38Jd3oLgTuiKs+hPkIVgdEZ0SuZvAXAjuKgJ5bno70Oq3GseTh6RVtOAdAv7oi jW/S1cG4INn+Y2hzL7Az3/XUGX7+r+JHbmKu12mcdV42U2I/mUekHl2tQoikq5DP Pwu1YHJdE3wrcrVNnzGrrA==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Ed6Ke7uC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=oDbTcMPAvYtLRnXVMdBpQQ==:117 a=oDbTcMPAvYtLRnXVMdBpQQ==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=smKx5t2vBNcA:10 a=zSv6zi-ZgakA:10 a=kBl-OI3rAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=yJ_l3v1SFDe3c75JOj0A:9 a=pLxN2xGgR0OPbCgNAGn6:22 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: ZXJpY2JhdmllckBjZW50dXJ5bGluay5uZXQ= Authentication-Results: smtp03.onyx.dfw.sync.lan smtp.user=ericbavier@centurylink.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [97.116.105.198] ([97.116.105.198:38056] helo=localhost.localdomain) by smtp.centurylink.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) id 46/71-11303-01DAEBB5; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 21:53:20 -0400 From: ericbavier@centurylink.net To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:52:45 -0500 Message-Id: <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0 In-Reply-To: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Eric Bavier X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) From: Eric Bavier * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-program' phase to handle "missing" inputs. (guix-minimal): New variable. --- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++ gnu/packages/package-management.scm | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm index 912b0218e..216f7c6d5 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/guile.scm @@ -226,6 +226,20 @@ without requiring the source code to be rewritten.") (home-page "https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/") (license license:lgpl3+))) +(define-public guile-2.0.13 + ;; For testing a "minimal" Guix + (hidden-package + (package (inherit guile-2.0) + (name "guile") + (version "2.0.13") + (source (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (string-append "mirror://gnu/guile/guile-" version + ".tar.xz")) + (sha256 + (base32 + "12yqkr974y91ylgw6jnmci2v90i90s7h9vxa4zk0sai8vjnz4i1p"))))))) + (define-public guile-2.2 (package (inherit guile-2.0) (name "guile") diff --git a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm index 000c28632..4ddcb55f4 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/package-management.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/package-management.scm @@ -232,13 +232,13 @@ (map (cut string-append <> "/share/guile/site/" effective) - deps) + (delete #f deps)) ":")) (gopath (string-join (map (cut string-append <> "/lib/guile/" effective "/site-ccache") - deps) + (delete #f deps)) ":"))) (wrap-program (string-append out "/bin/guix") @@ -371,6 +371,19 @@ the Nix package manager.") ("guile-ssh" ,guile2.0-ssh) ("guile-git" ,guile2.0-git))))) +(define-public guix-minimal + (let ((guix guile2.0-guix)) + (package + (inherit guix) + (name "guix-minimal") + (inputs + `(("guile" ,guile-2.0.13) + ,@(alist-delete "guile" (package-inputs guix)))) + (propagated-inputs + (fold alist-delete + (package-propagated-inputs guix) + '("guile-json" "guile-ssh")))))) + (define (source-file? file stat) "Return true if FILE is likely a source file, false if it is a typical generated file." -- 2.19.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 14 17:43:08 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2018 21:43:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBoAG-0003HK-HQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:43:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33291) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBoAF-0003H5-AR for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:43:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBoA9-0002lz-Jg for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:43:02 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gBoA8-0002l4-0Y; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:43:00 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=57044 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gBoA7-0000A4-Iu; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:42:59 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: ericbavier@centurylink.net Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> (ericbavier's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:52:45 -0500") Message-ID: <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hi, ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: > From: Eric Bavier > > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-pro= gram' > phase to handle "missing" inputs. > (guix-minimal): New variable. What=E2=80=99s the intended use case? Is it to check that Guix compiles ag= ainst an old Guile 2.0 and without optional dependencies? I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for this, es= pecially given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty old. Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 05:02:13 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 09:02:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBylR-0005fP-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:02:13 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:39210) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBylP-0005f7-18 for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 05:02:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [141.226.10.13]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21C9140027; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:02:04 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Message-ID: <20181015090203.GC2447@macbook41> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , ericbavier@centurylink.net, 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 11:42:58PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi, >=20 > ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: >=20 > > From: Eric Bavier > > > > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-p= rogram' > > phase to handle "missing" inputs. > > (guix-minimal): New variable. >=20 > What=E2=80=99s the intended use case? Is it to check that Guix compiles = against > an old Guile 2.0 and without optional dependencies? >=20 > I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for this, = especially > given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty > old. >=20 It might be old but it's still hanging around. Right now iirc Debian stable and Ubuntu 18.04 both ship with Guile-2.0 and with guile packages built against it. If someone wanted to build Guix from source using the various guile libraries there's a fair amount of packaging to do. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlvEV4gACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1H3eRAAo8hsSCW1GyQMVk9+tHI+iS20PUzaVI5E8o4gzC+Ra7kY2EYw7egkP7md wgmKWBp5cOVHH3zwlqBhNThpf2q+O/oEsc2WUstddD6PwE1LZVMKxbbygWbxAXtS /2WyB07WsalezdjYjy1qXZ8rq/77AbJ3ryRInyPsOUXmEMxFRi9nbAN8XwbM7FvY OOxdPDE5a2T5JwWDpkQH9+lWUELHR3Fi+XGXKytLcM8xNxXeRljknhx3b1AWgKy7 3Bj71DlY7XYQTWwxhdbAOu2JM/MZt8c1aMCuOkMApDwJLj+xMVU5pWtJig8SCYy4 LlIr3SFFXdo+PZF1JoV/rdvjEUufxw6PGWlvNnEY0JqD7l8oC3QEzgyQ1lm+QBz9 q7X4ILH8jsCN6aLpDA6nJQjo9zxTuBs/z7dhD+JhFISmP03R+KvkHg6muSh38Pyo 7q0z6FDG3yJyJddRh2yDyIYhQ6J8LlDWDiUkpjj6AlcNpTZrkiLbMadHTtUK+Jsp UnYf9HOgLWZBRhPYrJWphMQRgy702e+RgcPGrj4BHd55DC861kUx2KpJjFVD0cyp tsOoot3/pxxnAwtE/qjVIxCeIEoypYUbPWf+llV9oPK3mzKWG4Rv5LlR8yRyiT5C Cc/1jAnLC1hNi3rt4ua+PdQYRcPyA+alcgkfNhT/TdGM+xcfL7I= =Ut9q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 10:21:56 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 14:21:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50873 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3kq-0000w0-8T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:21:56 -0400 Received: from mail.onyx.syn-alias.com ([206.152.134.66]:30572 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3ko-0000vl-8y for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:21:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=centurylink.net; s=ctl201402; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@centurylink.net; t=1539613308; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=7aUbJ2QVeN5UU6LuGQRymVqEeaw=; b=zLQx4hUbtBDWy+FrI5zsRaBBC2gCm8defWVZDEOdHzX7qOSYhe00TtZe3B8uLSIu 6vQaiH59E1RRyxhLf6k1g8MgSJ5j6/2ysilNcat4UVqdpDwI36+/bFm+d8EvHz18 USilgaYyfZqOo/G5uLRz0pNFteJ5JM8t39vwipWeIKoID38yAbW942WhSJXPr0CU O3Bou0PQXBPD7PONBPzivVYf+4sR+/muHXJCWT0L5z+b1uQvHafJjFSorUsVmpU0 5jTN6/OMWat6a/XnEYr4NKb+k0ddiw5pu/38GKwnYU7zPTqNGRQ8xm0IexkRGUj1 38J28zwbrHgzA5F4pTF9Vw==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Ne6k7CL4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MhzntBxPsQQsyKet5jur4A==:117 a=MhzntBxPsQQsyKet5jur4A==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=smKx5t2vBNcA:10 a=zSv6zi-ZgakA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=I_5RNyk1AAAA:8 a=kBl-OI3rAAAA:8 a=dG4naJ6CaNcir_72H4oA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=dIAy94JqDkU0a50ofdIA:9 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 a=Eh9yxdLE6B1twWrs3SXz:22 a=pLxN2xGgR0OPbCgNAGn6:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: ZXJpY2JhdmllckBjZW50dXJ5bGluay5uZXQ= Authentication-Results: smtp01.onyx.dfw.sync.lan smtp.user=ericbavier@centurylink.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [97.116.181.145] ([97.116.181.145:44138] helo=localhost) by smtp.centurylink.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id 95/1B-28699-C72A4CB5; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:21:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:21:43 -0500 From: Eric Bavier To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?=) Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Message-ID: <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Hi, >=20 > ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: >=20 > > From: Eric Bavier > > > > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-p= rogram' > > phase to handle "missing" inputs. > > (guix-minimal): New variable. =20 >=20 > What=E2=80=99s the intended use case? Is it to check that Guix compiles = against > an old Guile 2.0 and without optional dependencies? Right, to make sure that what we're advertising to the outside world as far as minimum dependencies will actually work. >=20 > I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for this, = especially > given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty > old. This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix dependencies. `~Eric --Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlvEoncACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWbVxg//ZqMLs5nKMkbuj2gm2pif3PxH1nvbFY7l8uHY9N+oI6+NEUyNHDLazl2m PO/CewNV65euW+y5tu7m6Bqme6DtoRWK6MDc6nFnfs1bhZA5owtvITIWki7gVaau l9nEmFv+VMfnICDSQzFy0qSKeHVr3QmXnue+O7wZG2PxJOKZ3aYzeuFMDRoYteud YySWaUnQ4ViBwjb99XCOn7tGrjACinJFs+YhDDfOlguCf4rbHwuw3ZgJ5RyrGDcd 6WU5q0V2s10mO8hQJ1Py2fHeKlpCnshmfxQNgWTvw5jcYKTOvrm+oqmxIqFYTbyy zWHY2H1dSip9CT/of89u8NTXcT25g6PFFx0kv5fQx9hcykQDSf+CLQ4yqgV5pnOb TqMD6lVoOujKVTuGmbRokZSsNK9sIdObGBAa66E4zt/kJ06RneO2eXS9Jet01Zza hfLZUK3908dr7oo724gOsYq89rVYatBA5TZJTKZ677jzQ+IKMVJA2Q8xBEW3UCCd QEuVB0ucNUya976dPAc0cnkGh8T6J934B7fRtGwsdTr/6HxNsYnn+JdwRAQbKf1G 3JoxBC6+1vFpATg7fVkpG2z2xtNea9HOqbax7eKCGlU/IhmpFeT8CNIHzyjGUriO qL6doWri1avTIoXFebpOFzDKbKG9dz55/S6rxH1yD1N3N3iR2OY= =yFvi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 11:47:03 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 15:47:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50990 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC55D-0002pv-1D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:47:03 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:36467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC55A-0002pO-W3 for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:47:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.109] ([94.134.92.232]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVLj0-1g9Llc2zN8-00YgQQ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:46:50 +0200 Received: from [192.168.178.109] ([94.134.92.232]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVLj0-1g9Llc2zN8-00YgQQ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:46:50 +0200 Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. To: Efraim Flashner , =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015090203.GC2447@macbook41> From: Jonathan Brielmaier Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=jonathan.brielmaier@web.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFLri3sBCAC70cM07IJUQ2ZJaIsJy3gIDyNhtbRCFuu5zpuzhbqQ/+CsNX7zFGRn47xx O/QnByEA5FIUspgXFaSX72tMGD1MnydJ6PO+i1OuspEcpneqtaIn74TWq/tJxwll0A8qwJXD HZ9r4lQrTsJkUkaWgIeWJfwy2bi/Eu2RwcgApa3fKCBXbNCIif1/LkM6Y9xH7vedYiSE6yDs Tuy5xQmZqkoRnpr/Gfc0JrNFRWZr99VNIHDvIkqczfuYHqfCTxndFbc9WjBj7XgumAi/4Il5 RaUHlBpG19IV0kO8OfJxyfLvOa1vjX0vTXt5WxpnCXk/r7Fux0BwImFbysCEjL+picGPABEB AAHNJGpvbnNnZXIgPGpvbmF0aGFuLmJyaWVsbWFpZXJAd2ViLmRlPsLAfgQTAQIAKAUCUuuL ewIbIwUJCWYBgAYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ7PyDmItOS5/85Af+P+sR 77QOP7eJFJ8s0GPGWPTrf/Elewba3XQaRIi9WDrUs8UlM+cdk6et4//NCJkgF3I/YJL6mT4K yKqi8Q6kgbdjg4mIzQyTcZwQT4xxprEyBJjnCQmpeefT41eD11Dy24USKhWtdl+a2rUeSXzs z+bxTKegTHI5OZ4xVmB7xV9BQ4CiyYKq/t+gsmupvAXkJqVoQOO7YH3il+MI9dW7hvOlr5l7 8oRi8INfdBBkZaBK+Z8WLu7UjHTwl0C4ZG89Nz4L9qj2tPP99IVxeNxrX9xWUW9rgnaVVHBy xt1WRjSBfE5odDhwZmmABq0bNeiIuYERooSRqedsnmahV8vw/87ATQRS64t7AQgAsGeviVjk 7WAilEQrbjW5scL8U5nj2JictUTl9xVAJKebKfd1wYeEMditJI59qVbzF0QgvEmBdyH/8YVS fwZe1XWQfAGZQV3cS32IhXJqqg6YT2XEblW9rkTV5SWxs15FiMzVC+bkWY/xnqao+vjoq4rJ Funm49G4HN1yemibP2NmOjuwHE3QOhQPCjYuYkX6u26ARlwakmsj/qQ8fSHgAciVTH9VKPam 1ZzO47x3JM36bB7GmLaW+qij9k36Q+I6Wn6EuyYP56YBsLa0lTxumzu6VANdGnALdjJZRIDY p4jkgpXwUx+5szs85uSScDutmeSgnSAxptCn8ZR5AlFjfQARAQABwsBlBBgBAgAPBQJS64t7 AhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEOz8g5iLTkufjZkIAINZXpGGMi4H1/9VagiRtY8A1fv55aYXnNROJ3w9 78bHEOAY0TwVm9gnSIXPzpBjRamBPOgiwXGhhb06V9qeowBzbGa/3Z1gUzWkbkQj8qpa9JaV SB3oBphKpZ0Sx/SF/5FHXiSucxE0lx/8PwDAbHTMsXFkzEMxJabxmNrN4/WJ+udCr7Yfd+q7 BjGzY/jKyj5irVyqcF8gn7pfvi9XUKi+fQr7e9dgCWBWp+yJyDC5VZYO3P38qjszph9lLFYP CpUQp+QO2WlHryydPmhE2AJxDOgCtpI3yCltWJ2ZG5q0LEilQLJ1ZAbZ5PAZK5bT8GSUdoKt 1AhLnzyFQXpb0ac= Message-ID: <87fcc896-14d2-d59c-e877-047d5e65ab2a@web.de> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:46:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181015090203.GC2447@macbook41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Y4gLq33/dMEv6S9MV5r5GusMy2JRma6hZNjOP54e7XwQQJ4VbjN sc317cESGV+uVf5CoOZ4qb/Mz6K2MvkuHUR/2HX36jIO+xdpE3f5LiR3Aiz/hUwAjXNSBRh zVAe5+dRrWQbZBBSqauWuDJ9tsZAxib7lBvbP3WIcgrCSaLrYiSE+Ex3n8Qeo0Ua2fjovmu z63N2AYnysmAHHGdGvpNg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:vXEXFroygYI=:UoHCVObof1vEPOVfJG2Fsq kWrXFe95yTprJ/CGybWDUAkZdYAmmuptXgjb8jNe4xElVk5VHwDD1KbrzZeLLXEo2sC1iWCg9 G1yPZSGNNnVG1953/5wiTi6es0G1rqPH1uHExJuI2vFbJM/gFNfma8fQP2pdQUbt858f3oACJ 2LyKl5aPYD4F4dw57qzhU5ruPtV+A3uYajQYD0MsO4ILJDUUQktVnDC8M/VUCflUhCI9fD+mA jNB9oLGOui/xKmTuovPU3qyeusCD/qJK4Rb6QWntb+0xJ9nwj0ZVx0WW4w4ttGAPaeeZ4GCjl kU89KCxxMtD9avq4Xli8HGoI6XCKHiMbFjPI7F21ch4XNssXQWSjIhin8ZLUfaxFC2nCUnHOw Qd4Ti8Cn02sVURWM+J+LImtXDO8e9Wnas0IL+o1QedNEv9lCy0sMd9Np/u/LjDQdGcMYEPRZz ZYMt3tK33Ezjbe+oZag2+YLQNIugIW0mNyI/Jktq/w72S/0aKp+yLcsNCSf4ReXI3b0UWfaaD 4DtAAmvXLjJlnDS+MGvpbR7HmWlym/x+X9oJ8Nfj99WEMA/vedXmrQcu4Y/saWi3XW4t79eLm 4OPuoZElEOIKrat0KBh88rQbek7ouuqFZtRYZA6BDVhbbHvTWxdspYq50GEx/bugylZGTYk9I qhlEHB60cfTr4uN4ogWhIlaV9xtxcLx69a0KH0/dUIMtzM7QdDHAXWkvPBPDAe22aOWFN4eGu G4XCMKAO/iEeELo7qm9BVsK8GZvFhCiLN+MOFoRWTnAz7mZAikQNbEW5++ymBusHB2hCvvlrp c4KkXmuLsueZd46FFOhaR+ndS/yZ+vHUBL5RjbabFezxdbygFE= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 10/15/18 11:02 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 11:42:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: >> >>> From: Eric Bavier >>> >>> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. >>> * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-program' >>> phase to handle "missing" inputs. >>> (guix-minimal): New variable. >> >> What’s the intended use case? Is it to check that Guix compiles against >> an old Guile 2.0 and without optional dependencies? >> >> I wonder whether we should add packages “just” for this, especially >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty >> old. >> > > It might be old but it's still hanging around. Right now iirc Debian > stable and Ubuntu 18.04 both ship with Guile-2.0 and with guile packages > built against it. If someone wanted to build Guix from source using the > various guile libraries there's a fair amount of packaging to do. > I'm still work to bring guile2.2 to openSUSE. The problem is that autogen 5.18.14 has no guile2.2 support, the new release of autogen 5.18.16 should have it. I'm still trying to get it building... The whole status of guix with guile2.2 on openSUSE can be found here. Not that it's very work-in-progress: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:sleep_walker:guile From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 15:26:56 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 19:26:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Vw-0001Y4-0N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:26:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50460) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Vt-0001Xq-D9 for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:26:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Vn-00057u-6y for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:26:44 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Vi-00056O-SX; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:26:39 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=46638 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Vi-000614-KS; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:26:38 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Jonathan Brielmaier Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015090203.GC2447@macbook41> <87fcc896-14d2-d59c-e877-047d5e65ab2a@web.de> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:26:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87fcc896-14d2-d59c-e877-047d5e65ab2a@web.de> (Jonathan Brielmaier's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:46:48 +0200") Message-ID: <8736t7dn9v.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , Efraim Flashner , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Jonathan Brielmaier skribis: > I'm still work to bring guile2.2 to openSUSE. The problem is that > autogen 5.18.14 has no guile2.2 support, the new release of autogen > 5.18.16 should have it. I'm still trying to get it building... Note that it=E2=80=99s possible to have 2.0 and 2.2 (and 3.0) installed in parallel: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Parallel-Installation= s.html So you don=E2=80=99t have to switch all packages to Guile 2.2 overnight. > The whole status of guix with guile2.2 on openSUSE can be found here. > Not that it's very work-in-progress: > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:sleep_walker:guile Neat, thanks a lot for your work on this! (And thanks to Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 as well!) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 15:28:45 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 19:28:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51469 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Xl-0001bw-39 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Xj-0001bh-Ck for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8Xd-0006Uq-Is for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8XZ-0006RD-9v; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:35 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=46668 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8XZ-0001sS-1U; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:33 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 24 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:28:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> (Eric Bavier's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:21:43 -0500") Message-ID: <87tvlnc8m8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Eric Bavier skribis: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > >> Hi, >>=20 >> ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: >>=20 >> > From: Eric Bavier >> > >> > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. >> > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-= program' >> > phase to handle "missing" inputs. >> > (guix-minimal): New variable.=20=20 >>=20 >> What=E2=80=99s the intended use case? Is it to check that Guix compiles= against >> an old Guile 2.0 and without optional dependencies? > > Right, to make sure that what we're advertising to the outside > world as far as minimum dependencies will actually work. I see. >> I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for this,= especially >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty >> old. > > This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix > dependencies. OK. It does sound like an interesting CI job, but maybe not great as a package users can install. Though of course we can mark it as hidden and then it=E2=80=99s just an easy way to write that CI job. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 15 15:43:19 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2018 19:43:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51484 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8lr-0002dh-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:43:19 -0400 Received: from esa1.cray.iphmx.com ([68.232.142.33]:56889) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC8lp-0002dU-1P for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:43:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=cray.com; i=@cray.com; q=dns/txt; s=cray1024; t=1539632598; x=1571168598; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=ch+zTAUSRH4+ND4Q+gmXtmr1PWsJhTz//xLPn7KncDg=; b=UMr7N6Pv3WKTeQU7oIR+0gRWpMMrurSxvpiTvQpCKlwlILQJ4AaJe73Z 6Mh1bMp7Au+ToxY47LQ8zkpHRI6YIQrd3AMIDeorEVJc8ohU2v5On+KzW qBII5wdHQLUAFgb+6lxCeqjtrEHqbw13txlvGeNaK+ijwg3xAgtwC6OYy U=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,385,1534806000"; d="scan'208";a="22863125" X-Cray-OBMMKR: 1433258124 22863125 Received: from cray-smtp-7.cray.com (HELO sealmr01.us.cray.com) ([136.162.66.2]) by esa1.cray.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Oct 2018 20:43:11 +0100 Received: from pe06.us.cray.com (pe06.us.cray.com [172.30.79.74]) by sealmr01.us.cray.com (8.14.3/8.13.8/hubv3-LastChangedRevision: 16250) with ESMTP id w9FJh8ZR015962; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:43:09 -0700 Received: by pe06.us.cray.com (Postfix, from userid 30272) id 9C171ABF4D; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:43:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:43:08 -0500 From: Eric Bavier To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Message-ID: <20181015194308.GP117864@pe06.us.cray.com> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> <87tvlnc8m8.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87tvlnc8m8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:28:31PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Eric Bavier skribis: > > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 > > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> I wonder whether we should add packages “just” for this, especially > >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty > >> old. > > > > This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix > > dependencies. > > OK. It does sound like an interesting CI job, but maybe not great as a > package users can install. Though of course we can mark it as hidden > and then it’s just an easy way to write that CI job. Thoughts? I think marking it "hidden" would be fine. Do the build farms automatically build hidden packages too? -- Eric Bavier, Scientific Libraries, Cray Inc. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 16 07:28:12 2018 Received: (at 33010) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2018 11:28:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNWG-0008CZ-Cp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:28:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33148) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNWE-0008CK-Gx for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:28:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNW8-0001JZ-AM for 33010@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:28:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNW8-0001It-37; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:28:04 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=45432 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gCNW7-0002Oj-N6; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:28:03 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> <87tvlnc8m8.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015194308.GP117864@pe06.us.cray.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:28:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20181015194308.GP117864@pe06.us.cray.com> (Eric Bavier's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:43:08 -0500") Message-ID: <87sh16i11a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010 Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hi Eric, Eric Bavier skribis: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:28:31PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Eric Bavier skribis: >>=20 >> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 >> > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: >> >> I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for th= is, especially >> >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pre= tty >> >> old. >> > >> > This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix >> > dependencies. >>=20 >> OK. It does sound like an interesting CI job, but maybe not great as a >> package users can install. Though of course we can mark it as hidden >> and then it=E2=80=99s just an easy way to write that CI job. Thoughts? > > I think marking it "hidden" would be fine. OK, let=E2=80=99s do that, along with a comment explaining the purpose of t= his package. > Do the build farms automatically build hidden packages too? Yes I think so (see =E2=80=98all-packages=E2=80=99 in build-aux/hydra/gnu-s= ystem.scm.) Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 16 18:33:28 2018 Received: (at 33010-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2018 22:33:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gCXu4-00067E-GP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:33:28 -0400 Received: from mail.onyx.syn-alias.com ([206.152.134.66]:10343 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gCXu2-00066x-Se for 33010-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:33:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; d=centurylink.net; s=ctl201402; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@centurylink.net; t=1539729201; h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=mY9mO2SVO5UsEdoBRWJBm+R2Nqs=; b=UV/khgKfxPy+Ie50VN0o351I9AxERAAdqVGX5T8H3Ey+ababMxOox79omcpFJMSb 3yioSQbvUIKtQdTL91+LypG0+eV89+EmnFP1AVTuGznKpDuoftDfx0ULqyxV420y MWMNBI/flxK6lZME4BZUZm2cYd+YEOcBr3fJdk0krLyspXOgWhHOVP95LhOnBylA Adt4cJtvY7QHWvX5cYRWg2p1tO9m4Rv9kYo4G81doMR5iq087FBWt7ZepPNAZAJc +sUfBUySIM9n/pEmFlIrP+1Sxhy6BTz7A4xItGXOpbZUHu+gDTXNmM+F1TzpnfI2 RffAxvOOzSs0niaN0WNyKg==; X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Me0ugN3f c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MhzntBxPsQQsyKet5jur4A==:117 a=MhzntBxPsQQsyKet5jur4A==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=smKx5t2vBNcA:10 a=zSv6zi-ZgakA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=kBl-OI3rAAAA:8 a=I_5RNyk1AAAA:8 a=8-gfnmgsGHpFVX9QfngA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IHn7U-YeEGtWB2ew6fcA:9 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 a=pLxN2xGgR0OPbCgNAGn6:22 a=Eh9yxdLE6B1twWrs3SXz:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: ZXJpY2JhdmllckBjZW50dXJ5bGluay5uZXQ= Authentication-Results: smtp02.onyx.dfw.sync.lan smtp.user=ericbavier@centurylink.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [97.116.181.145] ([97.116.181.145:47712] helo=localhost) by smtp.centurylink.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384) id E6/AC-30023-13766CB5; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:33:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:33:24 -0500 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Message-ID: <20181016173324.08d16463@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87sh16i11a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> <87tvlnc8m8.fsf@gnu.org> <20181015194308.GP117864@pe06.us.cray.com> <87sh16i11a.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_//yv4SHx9DB6/F=_adUZfzO1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:28:01 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Bavier skribis: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:28:31PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Eric Bavier skribis: > >> > >> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 > >> > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> >> I wonder whether we should add packages “just” for this, especially > >> >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty > >> >> old. > >> > > >> > This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix > >> > dependencies. > >> > >> OK. It does sound like an interesting CI job, but maybe not great as a > >> package users can install. Though of course we can mark it as hidden > >> and then it’s just an easy way to write that CI job. Thoughts? > > > > I think marking it "hidden" would be fine. > > OK, let’s do that, along with a comment explaining the purpose of this > package. [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ericbavier[at]centurylink.net) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 33010-done Cc: 33010-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --Sig_//yv4SHx9DB6/F=_adUZfzO1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:28:01 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Hi Eric, >=20 > Eric Bavier skribis: >=20 > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:28:31PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: = =20 > >> Eric Bavier skribis: > >> =20 > >> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 > >> > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: =20 > >> >> I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for = this, especially > >> >> given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is p= retty > >> >> old. =20 > >> > > >> > This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix > >> > dependencies. =20 > >>=20 > >> OK. It does sound like an interesting CI job, but maybe not great as a > >> package users can install. Though of course we can mark it as hidden > >> and then it=E2=80=99s just an easy way to write that CI job. Thoughts= ? =20 > > > > I think marking it "hidden" would be fine. =20 >=20 > OK, let=E2=80=99s do that, along with a comment explaining the purpose of= this > package. Pushed with the above changes in 6f1ce09d79fa6148459c90120881e825551651b2 --Sig_//yv4SHx9DB6/F=_adUZfzO1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlvGZzQACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWZbXQ/+LdQImiFgwlhYLJt/QcqMZkUEOy8/V377MruLytnJc4FiFIweC7e6ccRr uQ6l4CYyrygCFe2W9oAa0xrQzbMHQ8GZF5znf9BqQ6yY2OnUc+6Oy3Gr2vEuMzxo nPyffljXORF0zA7v5Uea5c4pbW9tTIcga4UbWWl3tJIDJfeBtdjkG7aFHdIqmWuN ShlFta4o8pGkXW3+AWYmARTW0Q5bEd3m73jL0mv8CUB6Bls0gg5WZCedwuy4VJwF lcfypVLWo9Ey0h4S0hRXhNKpVLzpMj9ry+JyOz4S10LHC82XLa0xb+0VIWkGmm2C mMBzdPxIi2zI5djEZCBkjHqT39MSFr0dfGGnY4gNxA/wV8rZDgRK/L8NI6cIq7iL 8QaOzoCp5ZMuiMMB7Z+x6m1vya4DiLzCrK0xao8NU2cbuTThoBeoZMpUqlGo7zI+ 77oYGsX0PBE1mjCHCPfryQ0/+A/hUj1tQNZ45ITfhSnNeST52aNsZH1YoYDFpjoC XDTQSjz6yOfuS1FNjaRffPAVcqXjiFwpl5SXdcF6ajgGZ1nTvc7kmK8yHiyp1nZU ipV6wPy2Cl5cFB7nx7Cpf6x8W892hq92rxMR0REGAzm+b5zngFHK5mSEaMcgRXR6 FVp38Xw346siN/uvy6oBcRUEpRA5wZVYsA987ToiMRKuLbIggCY= =miMm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//yv4SHx9DB6/F=_adUZfzO1-- From unknown Mon Jun 16 23:43:00 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator