GNU bug report logs - #33007
27.0.50; Proposal for function to edit and return string

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>

Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:51:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 27.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #136 received at 33007 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>, 33007 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jean Louis <bugs <at> gnu.support>
Subject: Re: bug#33007: 27.0.50; Proposal for function to edit and return
 string
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 11:49:57 +0200
Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:

> -  (pop-to-buffer-same-window (generate-new-buffer "*edit string*"))
> +  (pop-to-buffer (generate-new-buffer "*edit string*")
> +                 '(display-buffer-below-selected
> +                   (window-height . (lambda (window)
> +                                      (fit-window-to-buffer window nil 10)))))

Shouldn't it wait to do the fitting until it's prepared the buffer?
I.e., it should create the buffer first, insert all the stuff, and then
pop to it?

> -    (kill-buffer (current-buffer))
> +    (quit-window 'kill)

I think we really want to kill the buffer?  It'd be disturbing to leave
thees buffers lying around from a function call like
read-string-from-buffer.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 16 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.