GNU bug report logs -
#32966
'gexp-modules' fails to delete duplicates when code is evaluated
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 32966-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Hi Clément,
>
> Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org> skribis:
>
>> For some time after your message, only 8 of those 16 tests seemed to
>> fail. But now they all fail again[1].
>
> These GuixSD installation tests occasionally fail for several reasons:
>
> • Sometimes I mess up with ‘guix system’ and the tests catch the
> regression (e.g., commit a29ce1f97dc8336e5a063f14d98d673b33b4bff4).
>
> • Sometimes there are missing files in the Guix tarball, which breaks
> ‘guix’ usage in the installation VM (commit
> 1e5b79e5d0e6629dce838dbb10febad676eea773).
>
> • Sometimes installing bare-bones takes slightly more than 1G and the
> tests assume 1G is enough (which is a good thing IMO, because it
> ensures the image size doesn’t grow unreasonably.)
>
> On this last point I expect we’ll do better when ‘core-updates’ is
> merged because currently on ‘master’ there’s both Guile 2.2.4 and 2.2.3
> in the system closure (the latter coming from the ‘guix’ package).
>
> Overall I think these tests are doing a good job a finding problems. :-)
>
> The problem is that these issues lead to dependency-failed failures on
> Cuirass/Hydra, and Cuirass currently doesn’t allow you to see which
> dependency failed and to view its build log (I can view that by logging
> in on berlin but that’s obviously suboptimal.) We should fix Cuirass to
> display that info though I’m not entirely sure how.
https://bugs.gnu.org/32954 I guess.
> Thoughts?
Thank you for the explanation. So they are different failures. It's
probably not worth keeping a bug open for them, so I'm closing it again.
Cheers,
Clément
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 184 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.