GNU bug report logs - #32947
[PATCH 0/3] Add java-xalan.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Frank Pursel <frank.pursel <at> gmail.com>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: 32947 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#32947] Add java-xalan.
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:13:33 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I concur.  WDYT is next?

Thanks,
Frank
(acrow#guix)

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 9:02 PM Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While looking superficially into the source for problems isn't a slow
> process (I didn't time it thoroughly but I'd say 20 minutes for 10% or
> so, and possibly less if the files are small, or maybe more if the
> timing was inaccurate or unrepresentative), I'm not exactly swimming in
> free time or something, so don't expect an ‘it's done!’ response
> anytime soon.
>
> I see two options here:
>
>   * you could look into the rest yourself (though technically a COI I
>     suppose ...)
>
>   * consider the current checks into the source code to be sufficient
>
> Also, about the IntStack thing:
>
>   * as you wrote, upstream has modified it a lot
>   * IIRC and IIUC (though I only looked rather superficially) it's
>     a rather basic class anyway, probably not many other plausible
>     ways to do it.  Also tiny.
>   * current OpenJDK's are freely licensed anyway
>   * upstream has been asked what, exactly, is the situation
>     (though it hasn't been answered yet)
>   * so I don't think this is a blocker
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.