GNU bug report logs - #32921
emacsclient obeys Xresources even when launched with -nw

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: 32921 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, larsi <at> gnus.org, jimis <at> gmx.net
Subject: bug#32921: emacsclient obeys Xresources even when launched with -nw
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:23:41 +0300

> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
> Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org,  32921 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  jimis <at> gmx.net
> Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 21:09:51 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > We already do that, see the information and the backtrace posted by
> > Lars a while ago.
> 
> Hmm... then why does this code still exist at all?

That's what we are trying to understand, among other things.  I posted
one possible explanation.

> x-create-frame-with-faces should take care of setting the `reverse'
> parameter entirely.

I'm not sure this is 100% true.

> Could you please explain what you meant by "startup timer" here?
> 
> > So the difference is between (a) taking notice of the reverseVideo
> > resource at startup timer as opposed to (b) at frame creation time, is
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > that right?  If so, I think this might affect the use case whereby
> > someone changes the X resources after Emacs has already started, or
> > something?

It's a typo: I meant "at startup time".

> > The code in x-win.el does something beyond that: it caters for people
> > who have X resources specified on their user-private files, and want
> > those settings to be in effect on all displays.
> 
> But then why only a single resource, and not all of them?  Especially
> an obscure one like reverseVideo?

I don't know.  I guess for some kind of backward compatibility.  This
is very old code.

> > People who want Emacs to behave like you describe can simply remove
> > this setting from their ~/.Xdefaults.
> 
> That wouldn't be useful, since Emacs doesn't even load ~/.Xdefaults if
> the X server it connected to already has some resources loaded.

You assume that those hypothetical people didn't take care of that.

> > Not necessarily, because frame-parameters applied by
> > gui_default_parameter could override those we took from ~/.Xdefaults.
> 
> I meant the parameters applied by gui_default_parameter when the
> parameter is not present in `default-frame-alist' or the ALIST argument.

Then I don't understand your objection at all: when Emacs starts up,
there's only one X server that can be relevant: the one where Emacs
shows its first frame.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.