GNU bug report logs - #32894
Exception in validate-runpath phase

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:55:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Cc: 32894 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32894: Exception in validate-runpath phase
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 14:21:46 +0200
Hello,

Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> skribis:

> Le 2018-10-02 14:31, ludo <at> gnu.org a écrit :
>> Hello Julien,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Then again, these are “.debuginfo” files so perhaps they are the result
>> of home-made ELF stripping (we don’t have this problem with “.debug”
>> files created with objcopy & co.).
>>
>> I can see two short-term “solutions”:
>>
>>   1. Remove those .debuginfo files prior to the ‘validate-runpath’
>>      phase.
>>
>>   2. Set #:validate-runpath? #f.
>>
>> Could you check in your build logs how those .debuginfo files are
>> produced?
>>
>> HTH!
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> As a workaround, I found that passing
> --with-native-debug-symbols=zipped to the configure script allowed
> validate-runpath to complete successfully. This option is documented
> as the prefered value for distributions, so I think it's a good thing
> to have. I creates zipped versions of these .debuginfo files, so
> validate-runpath doesn't look at them.

Hmm OK.  :-)

Is it the files that are zipped, or just .debug sections that are
gzipped?  (Binutils, GDB, etc. support the latter.)

> There is no mention of debuginfo until the install phase in my build
> log, so I don't know how they are built.

OK.

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 187 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.