From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 01 08:54:26 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2018 12:54:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60842 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xiM-0007Jv-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:54:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39813) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xiL-0007Jf-AU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:54:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xiB-0006Mp-UM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:54:12 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:36028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xi8-0006MI-E0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:54:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xi6-0002uC-8r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:54:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xi0-0006Jp-HE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:54:01 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([2a00:5884:8208::1]:45380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6xhz-0006JG-Dy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:53:56 -0400 Received: from webmail.lepiller.eu (static-176-182-42-79.ncc.abo.bbox.fr [176.182.42.79]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1cac9551 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:55:41 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:53:51 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Exception in validate-runpath phase Message-ID: X-Sender: julien@lepiller.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) Hi, I'm trying to create a new package for openjdk versions we don't have yet. While building openjdk 10 on top of core-updates (because gcc on master has a bug that prevents building openjdk 9 and 10), I get a stacktrace at the end of the validate-runpath phase: starting phase `validate-runpath' validating RUNPATH of 74 binaries in "/gnu/store/bdgbs6nsb1kzxpqmcxajjkvvkmk5kn72-openjdk-10+46/lib"... Backtrace: 11 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/cyxf063m59nb288xnpy94gr4chq…") In ice-9/eval.scm: 191:35 10 (_ _) In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 863:16 9 (every1 # …) In /gnu/store/p9wwyq2jfq2piwyc01qgsxm3hsxg2bnv-module-import/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: 799:28 8 (_ _) 557:16 7 (validate-runpath #:validate-runpath? _ # _ #:outputs _) In /gnu/store/p9wwyq2jfq2piwyc01qgsxm3hsxg2bnv-module-import/guix/build/utils.scm: 536:23 6 (every* # _) 536:23 5 (every* # …) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 829:9 4 (catch srfi-34 # …) In /gnu/store/p9wwyq2jfq2piwyc01qgsxm3hsxg2bnv-module-import/guix/build/gremlin.scm: 305:26 3 (_) In unknown file: 2 (remove # (#)) 1 (find # …) 0 (string-prefix? "libanl.so" 3659183287175258 # …) ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?: In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting string): 3659183287175258 I tried to investigate the issue and I have found that that running (validate-needed-in-runpath "/gnu/...") sometimes fails on some files. More specifically, it always succeeds on *.so files and on most *.debuginfo files, but it fails on these files: /gnu/store/bdgbs6nsb1kzxpqmcxajjkvvkmk5kn72-openjdk-10+46/lib/libjsound.debuginfo /gnu/store/bdgbs6nsb1kzxpqmcxajjkvvkmk5kn72-openjdk-10+46/lib/libjimage.debuginfo /gnu/store/bdgbs6nsb1kzxpqmcxajjkvvkmk5kn72-openjdk-10+46/lib/libjaas_unix.debuginfo /gnu/store/bdgbs6nsb1kzxpqmcxajjkvvkmk5kn72-openjdk-10+46/lib/libawt_xawt.debuginfo with the following backtrace: scheme@(guix build gremlin)> (validate-needed-in-runpath "/gnu/store/bdgbs6nsb1kzxpqmcxajjkvvkmk5kn72-openjdk-10+46/lib/libjsound.debuginfo") ERROR: In procedure string-prefix?: In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting string): 1 Entering a new prompt. Type `,bt' for a backtrace or `,q' to continue. scheme@(guix build gremlin) [1]> ,bt In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 829:9 4 (catch srfi-34 # # _) In guix/build/gremlin.scm: 305:26 3 (_) In unknown file: 2 (remove # (1)) 1 (find # ("libanl.so" "libcrypt.so" "libc.so" "libdl.so" "libm.so" "libnsl.so" "libp?" ?)) 0 (string-prefix? "libanl.so" 1 # # # #) Similarly for libawt_xawt, with the following error message: In procedure string-prefix?: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting string): 3659183287175258 Then, running: (elf-dynamic-info (call-with-input-file "libjsoundalsa.debuginfo" (compose parse-elf get-bytevector-all))) $79 = #< soname: #f needed: () rpath: () runpath: ()> (elf-dynamic-info (call-with-input-file "libjsound.debuginfo" (compose parse-elf get-bytevector-all))) $80 = #< soname: #f needed: (1) rpath: () runpath: ()> (elf-dynamic-info (call-with-input-file "libawt_xawt.debuginfo" (compose parse-elf get-bytevector-all))) $81 = #< soname: #f needed: (3659183287175258) rpath: () runpath: ()> shows that the number in the exception comes from the needed field. I think it should be empty. You can find these three files for comparison at: http://89.234.186.109/guix/libawt_xawt.debuginfo http://89.234.186.109/guix/libjsoundalsa.debuginfo http://89.234.186.109/guix/libjsound.debuginfo Thank you. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 02 08:31:34 2018 Received: (at 32894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2018 12:31:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Jpu-0004cE-0E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:31:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Jpr-0004c1-NG for 32894@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:31:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Jpi-0008E0-PW for 32894@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:31:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g7Jpb-0008Cz-Bg; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:31:17 -0400 Received: from nat-inria-bordeaux-52-gw-01-bso.bordeaux.inria.fr ([194.199.1.52]:43661 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g7JpY-0007VQ-DU; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 08:31:15 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: bug#32894: Exception in validate-runpath phase References: X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:31:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Julien Lepiller's message of "Mon, 01 Oct 2018 14:53:51 +0200") Message-ID: <877ej0o7ht.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32894 Cc: 32894@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hello Julien, Julien Lepiller skribis: > Then, running: > > (elf-dynamic-info (call-with-input-file "libjsoundalsa.debuginfo" > (compose parse-elf get-bytevector-all))) > $79 =3D #< soname: #f needed: () rpath: () runpath: ()> > > (elf-dynamic-info (call-with-input-file "libjsound.debuginfo" (compose > parse-elf get-bytevector-all))) > $80 =3D #< soname: #f needed: (1) rpath: () runpath: ()> > > (elf-dynamic-info (call-with-input-file "libawt_xawt.debuginfo" > (compose parse-elf get-bytevector-all))) > $81 =3D #< soname: #f needed: (3659183287175258) > rpath: () runpath: ()> The reason we get numbers here (rather than strings) is because the PT_DYNAMIC segment lacks a string table (DT_STRTAB), and thus there=E2=80= =99s nowhere the DT_NEEDED strings can be looked for, AIUI. That gremlin.scm lets the number through comes from this bit: (if string-table-offset (pointer->string (bytevector->pointer (elf-bytes elf) (vma->offset elf (+ string-table-offset value)))) value)) This is a questionable choice, but the crux of the problem is that these ELF files appear to be corrupt or at least non-conventional. Even BFD (from Binutils) fails to make sense of it: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ readelf -a /tmp/libawt_xawt.debuginfo | grep NEED $ readelf -a /tmp/libawt_xawt.debuginfo | grep PATH --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Compare with this (random example): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ readelf -a ~/.guix-profile/lib/libEGL.so.1 | grep NEED [ 6] .gnu.version_r VERNEED 0000000000004718 00004718 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxcb-dri2.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libX11-xcb.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libX11.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxcb-dri3.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxcb-xfixes.so.= 0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxcb-present.so= .0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxcb-sync.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxcb.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libXau.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libXdmcp.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libbsd.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libxshmfence.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libwayland-client= .so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgbm.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libz.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libwayland-server= .so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libffi.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [librt.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libexpat.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libdl.so.2] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libdrm.so.2] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.6] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libglapi.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libpthread.so.0] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1] 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6] 0x000000006ffffffe (VERNEED) 0x4718 0x000000006fffffff (VERNEEDNUM) 5 ludo@ribbon ~/src/guix$ readelf -a ~/.guix-profile/lib/libEGL.so.1 | grep P= ATH 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath: [/gnu/store/xmdk5= z05kqxpwgagxhlv375x3f82dxb3-libxcb-1.13/lib:/gnu/store/bid7hvpnm8nq04vm4dsz= ywxsw9g2kmf2-libx11-1.6.6/lib:/gnu/store/b9aapwjz2nhri24imzy491fx86ng8jvz-l= ibxau-1.0.8/lib:/gnu/store/07gpi7dx2rjs5v5n12q5b2sk7gxsliih-libxdmcp-1.1.2/= lib:/gnu/store/cy16rapipmypb7qj49ncphjkkj9nqkzx-libbsd-0.8.7/lib:/gnu/store= /ycj27z17m3n5qj1rwnyxdqkrk7li9712-libxshmfence-1.3/lib:/gnu/store/8w2i20d3g= h80x0a7hvbkww8yyn5ky2j8-wayland-1.15.0/lib:/gnu/store/hp2j1cjrca3ghi14ikzha= nx8yl41kihp-mesa-18.1.5/lib:/gnu/store/ppsylkcpw2fk2lkzhwjd60xyr9gjl70v-lib= ffi-3.2.1/lib:/gnu/store/70825hjil6070g7cs3mmdnfwmhxgga36-expat-2.2.5/lib:/= gnu/store/66h0jfk3k4wavw951ydkzv4x3wwgapkm-libdrm-2.4.92/lib:/gnu/store/l4l= r0f5cjd0nbsaaf8b5dmcw1a1yypr3-glibc-2.27/lib:/gnu/store/vla5j7pbkpcp39lsdfs= mz7m9azn48lr4-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib:/gnu/store/fxiwj2wpp11sif613axdax7gmwzsg6kp= -zlib-1.2.11/lib:/gnu/store/vla5j7pbkpcp39lsdfsmz7m9azn48lr4-gcc-5.5.0-lib/= lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.5.0/../../..] --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Then again, these are =E2=80=9C.debuginfo=E2=80=9D files so perhaps they ar= e the result of home-made ELF stripping (we don=E2=80=99t have this problem with =E2=80= =9C.debug=E2=80=9D files created with objcopy & co.). I can see two short-term =E2=80=9Csolutions=E2=80=9D: 1. Remove those .debuginfo files prior to the =E2=80=98validate-runpath= =E2=80=99 phase. 2. Set #:validate-runpath? #f. Could you check in your build logs how those .debuginfo files are produced? HTH! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 03 04:14:26 2018 Received: (at 32894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2018 08:14:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34879 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g7cIb-00072H-Rx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 04:14:26 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:56086) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g7cIZ-000726-KW for 32894@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 04:14:24 -0400 Received: from webmail.lepiller.eu (static-176-182-42-79.ncc.abo.bbox.fr [176.182.42.79]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 832b65dd (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for <32894@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:16:14 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:14:21 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: 32894@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#32894: Exception in validate-runpath phase In-Reply-To: <877ej0o7ht.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877ej0o7ht.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: julien@lepiller.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32894 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Le 2018-10-02 14:31, ludo@gnu.org a écrit : > Hello Julien, > > [...] > > Then again, these are “.debuginfo” files so perhaps they are the result > of home-made ELF stripping (we don’t have this problem with “.debug” > files created with objcopy & co.). > > I can see two short-term “solutions”: > > 1. Remove those .debuginfo files prior to the ‘validate-runpath’ > phase. > > 2. Set #:validate-runpath? #f. > > Could you check in your build logs how those .debuginfo files are > produced? > > HTH! > > Ludo’. As a workaround, I found that passing --with-native-debug-symbols=zipped to the configure script allowed validate-runpath to complete successfully. This option is documented as the prefered value for distributions, so I think it's a good thing to have. I creates zipped versions of these .debuginfo files, so validate-runpath doesn't look at them. There is no mention of debuginfo until the install phase in my build log, so I don't know how they are built. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 08 08:22:02 2018 Received: (at 32894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2018 12:22:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39950 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g9UXy-0004mV-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:22:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g9UXx-0004m2-0x for 32894@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:22:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9UXn-0007gG-Hd for 32894@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:21:55 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9UXm-0007g8-SI; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:21:51 -0400 Received: from [193.50.110.78] (port=55850 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1g9UXm-0005iq-H3; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:21:50 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: bug#32894: Exception in validate-runpath phase References: <877ej0o7ht.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 =?utf-8?Q?Vend=C3=A9miaire?= an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 14:21:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Julien Lepiller's message of "Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:14:21 +0200") Message-ID: <87bm8439yd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32894 Cc: 32894@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hello, Julien Lepiller skribis: > Le 2018-10-02 14:31, ludo@gnu.org a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >> Hello Julien, >> >> [...] >> >> Then again, these are =E2=80=9C.debuginfo=E2=80=9D files so perhaps they= are the result >> of home-made ELF stripping (we don=E2=80=99t have this problem with =E2= =80=9C.debug=E2=80=9D >> files created with objcopy & co.). >> >> I can see two short-term =E2=80=9Csolutions=E2=80=9D: >> >> 1. Remove those .debuginfo files prior to the =E2=80=98validate-runpat= h=E2=80=99 >> phase. >> >> 2. Set #:validate-runpath? #f. >> >> Could you check in your build logs how those .debuginfo files are >> produced? >> >> HTH! >> >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > As a workaround, I found that passing > --with-native-debug-symbols=3Dzipped to the configure script allowed > validate-runpath to complete successfully. This option is documented > as the prefered value for distributions, so I think it's a good thing > to have. I creates zipped versions of these .debuginfo files, so > validate-runpath doesn't look at them. Hmm OK. :-) Is it the files that are zipped, or just .debug sections that are gzipped? (Binutils, GDB, etc. support the latter.) > There is no mention of debuginfo until the install phase in my build > log, so I don't know how they are built. OK. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 19 09:51:26 2021 Received: (at 32894-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2021 14:51:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mo5Ec-000250-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:51:26 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:39308) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mo5Ea-00024q-8r for 32894-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:51:25 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bb07aee0 for <32894-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=K38YbLYKsKx+ZIzQi+0BAB581 VnK58lkW3FJpkX0CUA=; b=mOk1JAt+TJxftyQ850aShkkWxaynNgCu1Ca7/Chyt v5z3AOFPxoM8O0bLSBEn3wcKiboTITg1fg7kLhiwcuQHlwDFJoBZRdjcf1ty5Q4a dn5+x44TYvSuo9nMzAPqoNftvyfkGz56u1qYlNng1ueN+208nhncG53tTbjUAo0z nhnmWAJJrd7N0FZuXDJOj5AnmyDNP8gDyiW4CFfYLGHOoa7ULCstN49nwqLt41sh xRdW81dHbX0xPm7qoo9hRVb9W5li0s06SoQIrUL2rREb1icvaR27+Fc6O6VytwWj rMZ0PvnMuJgw07VJKkcpDMr9lBAB52KfD2KGpDuzpCvng== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0abc16c6 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for <32894-close@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 14:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:51:17 -0500 From: Julien Lepiller To: 32894-close@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Exception in validate-runpath phase User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Message-ID: <17794981-26CE-4A76-8EF5-11E71A290131@lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=----6U8SY7QNSMC397KWDPFH1KZNASS3VR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32894-close X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) ------6U8SY7QNSMC397KWDPFH1KZNASS3VR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since then, we have openjdk 10, and much more recent versions=2E I don't re= member what fixed the issue, but I haven't seen it since then, so closing := ) ------6U8SY7QNSMC397KWDPFH1KZNASS3VR Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since then, we have openjdk 10, and much more re= cent versions=2E I don't remember what fixed the issue, but I haven't seen = it since then, so closing :) ------6U8SY7QNSMC397KWDPFH1KZNASS3VR-- From unknown Mon Jun 23 04:13:31 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:24:12 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator