GNU bug report logs - #32868
Check if make supports nested variables is done twice when using silent rules

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: bug-automake <at> gnu.org, Jacob Kroon <jacob.kroon <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:37:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: confirmed

Done: Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32868: closed (Check if make supports nested variables is
 done twice when using silent rules)
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 06:53:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2022 01:52:07 -0500
with message-id <Yh3Cl8la1ip9/0xU <at> vapier>
and subject line Re: bug#32868: [PATCH v2] m4: rework silent-rules macros to avoid double expansion
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32868,
regarding Check if make supports nested variables is done twice when using silent rules
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
32868: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32868
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com>
To: Jacob Kroon <jacob.kroon <at> gmail.com>, bug-autoconf <at> gnu.org,
 bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: Check if make supports nested variables is done twice when using
 silent rules
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:36:40 -0500
On 9/28/18 1:47 PM, Jacob Kroon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If I use AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]) in my configure.ac, when I run the
> configure scripts I see this:
> ...
> checking whether make supports nested variables... yes
> checking whether make supports nested variables... (cached) yes
> ...
> 
> If I remove AM_SILENT_RULES, the test is only done once.
> 
> Is this intended behaviour ?

I don't know. But AM_SILENT_RULES is supplied by automake, not autoconf, 
so it's better to ask your question on the correct list.  I've gone 
ahead and updated the CC's accordingly.

> 
> I'm on an updated Debian Stretch system using (Debian version syntax):
> autoconf 2.69-10
> automake 1:1.15-6
> 
> Regards Jacob
> 
> 

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier <at> gentoo.org>
To: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Cc: 32868-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#32868: [PATCH v2] m4: rework silent-rules macros to avoid
 double expansion
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 01:52:07 -0500
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
On 28 Feb 2022 15:58, Karl Berry wrote:
>     Fixes automake bug https://bugs.gnu.org/32868.
> 
> Looks fine to me.
> 
>     +./configure -C
>     +grep '^AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY = 1' Makefile
> 
> Good :).
> 
> I remain steadfastly opposed to (ever) changing the default to be silent
> rules, as we've already discussed ad nauseam :).

we shall see :p
-mike
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 143 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.