GNU bug report logs -
#32803
26.1.50; cl-do: Add more literature in docstring
Previous Next
Reported by: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:04:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Found in version 26.1.50
Done: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #37 received at 32803-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
>> index 10bc611325..b02a917ac0 100644
>> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
>> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
>> @@ -1747,10 +1747,9 @@ cl--loop-build-ands
>> (defmacro cl-do (steps endtest &rest body)
>> "Bind variables and run BODY forms until END-TEST returns non-nil.
>> First, each VAR is bound to the associated INIT value as if by a `let' form.
>> -Then, in each iteration of the loop, the END-TEST is evaluated; if true,
>> -the loop is finished. Otherwise, the BODY forms are evaluated, then each
>> -VAR is set to the associated STEP expression (as if by a `cl-psetq'
>> -form) and the next iteration begins.
>> +Then, the END-TEST is evaluated; if true, the loop is finished. Otherwise,
>> +the BODY forms are evaluated, then each VAR is set to the associated
>> +STEP expression (as if by a `cl-psetq' form) and the next iteration begins.
>
> The variable name is endtest, so I guess should be ENDTEST here (no
> hyphen), the same way you've got it later on.
No, we must use the variables exposed to the user: VAR, INIT, STEP,
END-TEST, RESULT, BODY.
Note the last line of the docstring, or try:
M-x describe-function cl-do RET
>> Once the END-TEST becomes true, the RESULT forms are evaluated (with
>> the VARs still bound to their values) to produce the result
>> @@ -1759,6 +1758,10 @@ cl-do
>> Note that the entire loop is enclosed in an implicit `nil' block, so
>> that you can use `cl-return' to exit at any time.
>>
>> +Also note that the ENDTEST belongs to the iteration; it's always checked
>> +before evaluate BODY. In particular, if ENDTEST evaluates initially non-nil,
>> +the `cl-do' will end without running BODY.
>
> Some tiny edits here and in the cl-do* docstring:
>
> Also note that ENDTEST is checked before evaluating BODY. If ENDTEST
> is initially non-nil, `cl-do' will exit without running BODY.
Sounds good. I will write in this way. Thank you.
Pushed into emacs-26 branch as commit 'Improve cl-do, cl-do* docstrings'
(7296b6fbf27aeae76ea63ab2d9d9f2e46491b971)
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 238 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.