From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 20 22:02:47 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2018 02:02:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3AmN-0003uf-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60039) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3AmL-0003uT-28 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3AmE-0006UX-UO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:39 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3AmE-0006TW-QW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3AmE-0000yD-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3AmA-0006IE-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52c]:46941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3Am8-0005aI-T2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:02:33 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id b129-v6so5271041pga.13 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:02:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=PAqgsKI9t1D0jwdsK2pSUYFyk7qm2gfTMGXhEVhZ/TQ=; b=g9KD5m/TmZBUhRGBQGywVrfl5s/P3WQRFQoO7mBoX+643+HuHNuPZZ+axwSheNU0zS Wkdw6+zRVnZA35fZFQDSeKYtuTGgm+C/oGd9QDcbw3T/RO//LUajPeyNCFaBn8nGoRj+ +FWWmHNWWc1g954GOPKzL+bI5bSV2yipTRXMr772hFvK/xZiZbexJ2XblDNtbcMetA5J z8AzBk+D4KiLwDiTq69oI+mzE5mflULiRNd2XZmmIjcMa/zKjXcA2iV/E5/3u6Vkm9AU QNrpiE0+SFDuSalwaDDTQH3rGoEFjojKDNj+hgjr/6Es/7B7PyYwdaoaxGsnGYXE3dXk myxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=PAqgsKI9t1D0jwdsK2pSUYFyk7qm2gfTMGXhEVhZ/TQ=; b=b+uaNFFZRv28SogYLVaOfzkBww4uHBTGo/gxA2WXSeK6P+VRTVxVroQgE5PvCp9uU4 oWjZNdVWHzdT6V/hDDrrgcnLamIQudVfVSfnTUd22uLipMHkkIDxOXaqfWSzARpHgFCx YqRLymOuMAldzJBjOqI0mZEWwMYaPFV0IqalMnX0WamgTikxHn8FBn8laFUnMiMmC9ct qi9EzJ0+fkN0kPxl9QGBMVSmDTXKucImiIhIqgx96ShPtGRaqX1X6LmWJGroQWybII6w ihdU6Siakq8HoPI+Vm0R1fqC2nK/iwjwQpaMz1HYLzVCIyqAclP4gdEdOJOIG+Ry0iOo H/pw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BtEyJMCg7PVvFEz1FvxrurYxH/PY82ReHrZGEJ2qikjDiDo3UC wjvEqjFBxhHzJ1xzY34Kf1YasUNk X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdbzi2yIz7tAtfjQp5bT7rse5OkMREfKNGeZBHYQZ/mhOgn4aeVEabEkSBXVAWn2v5HgFlkQJg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4107:: with SMTP id o7-v6mr8266543pga.256.1537495343629; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.251.103.129] ([210.160.37.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 82-v6sm36956645pfw.159.2018.09.20.19.02.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:02:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Jean-Christophe Helary Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: 27.0.50; invalid XML character considered as valid in nxml validation Message-Id: <9CA511E6-635B-44DB-8C98-70BD98371BB6@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:02:17 +0900 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 16, x86_64-apple-darwin17.7.0, NS = appkit-1561.60 Version 10.13.6 (Build 17G65)) of 2018-08-28 built on mabinogion.local Repository revision: d77d01d22902acdc45c2c7059de4f1b158ab5806 Windowing system distributor 'Apple', version 10.3.1561 System Description: Mac OS X 10.13.6 This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: (=1F): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) Jean-Christophe Helary ----------------------------------------------- http://mac4translators.blogspot.com @brandelune From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 22:06:32 2019 Received: (at 32792) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2019 02:06:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41020 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm7Ql-0002OW-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:06:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm7Qk-0002OP-IZ for 32792@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:06:31 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hm7Qh-0004JU-OM; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:06:30 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Jean-Christophe Helary Subject: Re: bug#32792: 27.0.50; invalid XML character considered as valid in nxml validation References: <9CA511E6-635B-44DB-8C98-70BD98371BB6@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:06:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9CA511E6-635B-44DB-8C98-70BD98371BB6@gmail.com> (Jean-Christophe Helary's message of "Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:02:17 +0900") Message-ID: <87pnme1ye4.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jean-Christophe Helary writes: > This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: > > > > (): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) > > Do you have a test case starting from "emacs -Q"? (I'm not familiar with how nmxl-mode says that something is valid or not.) Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32792 Cc: 32792@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Jean-Christophe Helary writes: > This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: > > > > (): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) > > Do you have a test case starting from "emacs -Q"? (I'm not familiar with how nmxl-mode says that something is valid or not.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 12 22:09:24 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2019 02:09:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm7TX-0002TD-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:09:23 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:53430) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm7TV-0002T5-VE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:09:22 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hm7TT-0004Lg-G6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:09:21 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:09:19 +0200 Message-Id: <87k1cm1y9c.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #32792 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 32792 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 32792 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 12:24:51 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 16:24:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt35-0005Pt-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:24:51 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35102) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt34-0005Pf-2A for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:24:50 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt30-0003oK-NM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:24:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:24:46 +0200 Message-Id: <87d0fliu5t.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #32792 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 32792 - moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 32792 - moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 12:24:56 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 16:24:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt39-0005QG-RV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:24:56 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt38-0005Q6-3i for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:24:54 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt35-0003oT-Bp for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:24:53 +0200 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:24:51 +0200 Message-Id: <87blv5iu5o.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #32792 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 32792 + confirmed quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 32792 + confirmed quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 27 12:25:52 2019 Received: (at 32792) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 16:25:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48572 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt44-0005TC-7H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:25:52 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:35156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt41-0005T2-P6 for 32792@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:25:50 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDt3x-0003pF-5m; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:25:49 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Jean-Christophe Helary Subject: Re: bug#32792: 27.0.50; invalid XML character considered as valid in nxml validation References: <9CA511E6-635B-44DB-8C98-70BD98371BB6@gmail.com> <87pnme1ye4.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:25:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnme1ye4.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:06:27 +0200") Message-ID: <877e5tiu47.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Jean-Christophe Helary writes: > >> This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: >> >> >> >> (): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) >> >> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Jean-Christophe Helary writes: > >> This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: >> >> >> >> (): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) >> >> > > Do you have a test case starting from "emacs -Q"? (I'm not familiar > with how nmxl-mode says that something is valid or not.) I see now that it uses rng mode to update the validity status in the mode line, and I can confirm that it reports that this document is valid. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 30 09:33:44 2021 Received: (at 32792) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2021 14:33:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40521 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ms4CW-0007fM-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:33:44 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ms4CU-0007f5-M3 for 32792@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:33:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=60CSnoP7YsCWAEZpnctsopscu2IN684DcyR62yewo4c=; b=b9k48/Pvgm/+yUW0nKcyDO8pY/ lMn+NG9JTDEZzBliFudmZzK+eZ9V1JQdZ0/LW0CkJAjKj81SV1noVty9WrM36QtpBLeS4zOjwzuRc Y2prAT3UenNGCZrzuFSsX414FrCJqX7zJoNtjc72QwjaAO/M3nBkakcvljoNO7OtzuDQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ms4CL-0006xJ-E1; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:33:36 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Jean-Christophe Helary Subject: Re: bug#32792: 27.0.50; invalid XML character considered as valid in nxml validation References: <9CA511E6-635B-44DB-8C98-70BD98371BB6@gmail.com> X-Now-Playing: Normil Hawaiians's _More Wealth Than Money_: "Red Harvest" Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:33:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9CA511E6-635B-44DB-8C98-70BD98371BB6@gmail.com> (Jean-Christophe Helary's message of "Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:02:17 +0900") Message-ID: <87a6hlogqu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Jean-Christophe Helary writes: > This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: > > > > (): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) > > According to XML 1.1, that's a valid XML character: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32792 Cc: 32792@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Jean-Christophe Helary writes: > This XML is considered valid by nxml validation: > > > > (): invalid XML character (Unicode: 0x1f) > > According to XML 1.1, that's a valid XML character: https://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#charsets So I don't think there's anything to fix. (But parsers using following older XML standards will disagree.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 30 09:33:49 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2021 14:33:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ms4Ca-0007fe-Sv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:33:49 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ms4CY-0007fA-DP for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:33:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/MrPw5rpoQTkrmETfgGfFfSG1TM+Sw5F/6RfOjjlKMs=; b=KQNkZiGUKc2WejS90t9V9aWP3v +2CQwuMdoCtCfdJHvHd/utw4/XyjNxa1cBlDgAMl75td3t+zdiiX5D8mBOO/+o/UbLf08XTzKSuLl 2uYKfi+39tmaa8v04rjK3+hHegtq9heVQbKu/3EjpB5hYVtx4SAKpn9MV2+bRbG++e0A=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ms4CQ-0006xR-Tc for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:33:40 +0100 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:33:38 +0100 Message-Id: <878rx5ogql.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #32792 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 32792 notabug close 32792 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 32792 notabug close 32792 quit From unknown Sat Aug 16 21:01:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator