GNU bug report logs - #32769
Packaging Next browser (Common Lisp) [work in progress]

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>

Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:16:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Done: Pierre Neidhardt <pierre <at> atlas.engineer>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #41 received at 32769 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Patterson <ajpatter <at> uwaterloo.ca>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 32769 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#32769: Packaging Next browser (Common Lisp) [work in progress]
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 23:11:20 -0400

Hi Pierre,

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:34:14 +0200
Pierre Neidhardt <mail <at> ambrevar.xyz> wrote:

> Question: do we need both "out" and "lib" outputs?
> My understanding is that "lib" is useful when one wants to start the
> program from a REPL.  Correct?

"out" will always depend on "lib" for programs.  We want to build it
the same way as other systems so that all of the source for the
program remains inspect-able at run-time, even if it's just a
one-liner.

--
Andy
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 229 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.