From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 32736@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.153694278831579 (code B ref -1); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:34:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2018 16:33:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1o-0008DH-G2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:33:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1m-0008Co-R1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:33:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1g-00081t-Qk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:33:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1g-00081n-NX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:33:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1e-0003uj-R9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:33:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1X-0007uy-T5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:32:58 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:38294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g0r1X-0007uL-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:32:51 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8EGTILE192544 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:32:49 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=zKU/TzqkeKUfxlX1F8NWiI1CX8+OUBiQ9DHNjiTgbWQ=; b=1lZYPuZPjLqiZ0CG17xwro3hFwsZQST/ZFApTUehJDrf7Jgspm/0xYipGqBMGWnxOGoi WDvMd0fn9YdnsaOOqI745thE0zX9GOp4kB6jL4jWOvEQ3ejBUxbSZ/Rj59+xPLHGk4WS 2nBdEJwdkmygrPYP8FvBIqaFPR002SNQfOdoNfGjpVjxZX39fZHYiQg5iEAtZ+w5hYCC PbEPLKTnirPaGygGF7WkP5OX2obDN5XnvbvcWx+xAJc1i0HGkSrnlRGzG137R7JmbXRk NH95x+BV5jRRgwLvq96ChPVU1kAWhaITzEbVueCLmaHxXwkXVn+i9gi43Jj8IecSA+Cb ZA== Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2mc72r82h3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:32:49 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w8EGWhOq005061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:32:43 GMT Received: from abhmp0013.oracle.com (abhmp0013.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w8EGWhvb011621 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 16:32:43 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1286c155-b91e-4a13-9b1a-b77b9d94887f@default> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 09:32:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4735.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9015 signatures=668708 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809140168 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Possible enhancement: Change default binding of `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame'. Unlike `make-frame-command', `clone-frame' would use the same frame-parameter values as the selected frame. Here's a possible definition of `clone-frame': (defun clone-frame (&optional frame) "Make a new frame with the same parameters as FRAME. FRAME defaults to the selected frame. The frame is created on the same terminal as FRAME. If the terminal is a text-only terminal then also select the new frame." (interactive) (let* ((default-frame-alist (frame-parameters frame)) (new-fr (make-frame))) (unless (display-graphic-p) (select-frame new-fr)))) In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2018-05-30 Repository revision: 07f8f9bc5a51f5aa94eb099f3e15fbe0c20ea1ea Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.16299 Configured using: `configure --without-dbus --host=3Dx86_64-w64-mingw32 --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=3D-O2 -static -g3'' From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.153695148814227 (code B ref 32736); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2018 18:58:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0tI5-0003hN-E3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:58:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:45495) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0tI2-0003gr-Ay for 32736@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:58:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 20-v6so11537099wrb.12 for <32736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:58:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JhgPgxOlNG8qBZr1WRd2Xoq22CNKCIwswomM4sjsQuM=; b=usAY/sAtutBCFmTuZTzlR2GNuzZJx822Xb2YpB3mBytcxyNOWLZSd/HXrvUiHYXFq0 214iybBc4Qpm+BaOilSUXzDNEq6PdNC9II5c3HjQfZKWBgmqTZeFB93Goxu3Yq5s6r+T O3GmgcKx9nVr3yf6f2CvzUizmGp0/M283ItTR2TJJqHtzuHYThqI39YU1UYYZ3PLIxe/ qaiFniWybXGd4gUdAXj9gkGmbAsfMlBXvLM+6OKGnsqPzllTwQ8Pe2G+Jisc2YcL50Yq PKLzB/kyOXc+Q/jBqPKqAgT8rCPnkIhbI64xWHyLsiRTqRkLVViOjhwrJtydcHT0WSdk aXXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JhgPgxOlNG8qBZr1WRd2Xoq22CNKCIwswomM4sjsQuM=; b=bRn+z0zonRvHuvZ0mU4S0YEeWbR3dShioAXXCDAccIMboLnPfWZeVTOSd8n+O5lrHw l+5XoClBwc7Rz2SYykwm9rsoSEfdaLYZf/xZvq6mxO2Igh9wgZzOYb3gc/QU4ppDbHrx mA5/KqbQ3zSp/X1C1QjHqH/PD55AgMilB0h9C1GMGQIWf2NsEVRBj56DvxRJmR6gRnKW GoIQvHapZq1UYFNBxOGyXDFhO9rPEG+iKFlom8RfUr5nh1x2bRqCwKGkVKUeq9LgT7ld DZE2FEHiz/8jUVX3S/uZok8CuvAd2VcxA5Vc4AcG+SwOdgcN+2F0m2PzXdxD4Igk0tw+ LYDg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DeSuWX//cw8ptr5HzO+zD+rHZq10B5zmAJ8x0WfeXVyHibh0c+ 3rUBRIkdjEPFxthMipXXYfiBqK6y X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbBhQYoOm/CWmbCxD/qInap15/3m911hvIdZrpzi75AWDRxVqZnz2bgBSfvTAVI5Szo+N0G5A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:db51:: with SMTP id f17-v6mr10842730wrj.212.1536951475904; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rpluim-ubuntu (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n15-v6sm4756157wrm.27.2018.09.14.11.57.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 11:57:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Pluim References: <1286c155-b91e-4a13-9b1a-b77b9d94887f@default> Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:57:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1286c155-b91e-4a13-9b1a-b77b9d94887f@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 14 Sep 2018 09:32:42 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87k1nnoqj1.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: > Possible enhancement: Change default binding of `C-x 5 2' to > `clone-frame'. Unlike `make-frame-command', `clone-frame' would use the > same frame-parameter values as the selected frame. Here's a possible > definition of `clone-frame': Hmm, how common is it to have a frame that doesn=CA=BCt have the same frame parameters as 'default-frame-alist', and you want to replicate them? Personally I quite like the current behaviour. > (defun clone-frame (&optional frame) > "Make a new frame with the same parameters as FRAME. > FRAME defaults to the selected frame. The frame is created on the > same terminal as FRAME. If the terminal is a text-only terminal then > also select the new frame." > (interactive) > (let* ((default-frame-alist (frame-parameters frame)) > (new-fr (make-frame))) > (unless (display-graphic-p) (select-frame new-fr)))) How about you make it take a prefix argument to get back 'make-frame-command' semantics (or keep the current ones, and add 'clone-frame' semantics to the prefix arg)? Robert From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Robert Pluim Cc: 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.153695377017893 (code B ref 32736); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2018 19:36:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0tsw-0004eX-II for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:36:10 -0400 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:42794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0tss-0004e3-VW for 32736@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 15:36:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8EJYaJT020074; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:36:01 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=TMZnl7Uiek/XTs9xt/RO5MCHcav86043yVVkNnd+Zno=; b=HEphF2maZBB88z9RM4hsWUvQfV7URzA2vPlRpRvG3aWakvlzBVIkWNvxj7DJN/WpfwfU 4T2JvZcJzR5tpgMiRYx801u0fQFrf6lKmL5ZhoNf47G8cudcoeuBHuzA2Dt/E82rCS6s gLyxzhroA0MJ6Do465FUNwgipQwt9uYSQYgAoi0zs81yVsN7OjdyAsgpKnNIrVBmKZqD rFOeJWcm91Jq6VVQaAuCGZJbGNbPSQT2N7sliF5r5wRurPO//YElvzETLUxkAgim6QWU XYPJHV5p8wRKGHt8iIFnP5yqphcXxwtMAr5IpZe87V5Ku/n6Q1Fk0HJyZoNFtDc3ZmXg aA== Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2mc5uu0vt8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:36:00 +0000 Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w8EJZxak019695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:36:00 GMT Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w8EJZxl9019750; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:35:59 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <9314b97e-c9c0-4f9a-bb47-f7335797d370@default> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:35:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams References: <1286c155-b91e-4a13-9b1a-b77b9d94887f@default> <87k1nnoqj1.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87k1nnoqj1.fsf@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4735.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9016 signatures=668708 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809140198 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > > Possible enhancement: Change default binding of `C-x 5 2' to > > `clone-frame'. Unlike `make-frame-command', `clone-frame' would use th= e > > same frame-parameter values as the selected frame. Here's a possible > > definition of `clone-frame': >=20 > Hmm, how common is it to have a frame that doesn=CA=BCt have the same fra= me > parameters as 'default-frame-alist', and you want to replicate them? > Personally I quite like the current behaviour. It's definitely the case for me. I use several kinds of special-display fra= mes. If I use it on a *Help* frame get a *Help* frame (same background etc.= ). If I use it on an *info* frame I get an *info* frame, and so on. If it's not the case for you then you should get pretty much the same behav= ior as now. I don't think you'll notice a difference. > How about you make it take a prefix argument to get back > 'make-frame-command' semantics (or keep the current ones, and add > 'clone-frame' semantics to the prefix arg)? Fair enough. (defun clone-frame (&optional frame no-clone) "Make a new frame with the same parameters as FRAME. With a prefix arg, don't clone - just call `make-frame-command'. FRAME defaults to the selected frame. The frame is created on the same terminal as FRAME. If the terminal is a text-only terminal then also select the new frame." (interactive "i\nP") (if no-clone (make-frame-command) (let* ((default-frame-alist (frame-parameters frame)) (new-fr (make-frame))) (unless (if (fboundp 'display-graphic-p) (display-graphic-p) window-s= ystem) (select-frame new-fr))))) From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Phil Sainty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 00:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Robert Pluim , Drew Adams Cc: 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.153697096813978 (code B ref 32736); Sat, 15 Sep 2018 00:23:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2018 00:22:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41003 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0yMK-0003dL-8a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:22:48 -0400 Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:57999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0yMH-0003d6-2n for 32736@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:22:46 -0400 Received: from [150.107.172.72] (port=23507 helo=[192.168.20.103]) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g0yME-0001PI-Bd; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:22:42 +1200 References: <1286c155-b91e-4a13-9b1a-b77b9d94887f@default> <87k1nnoqj1.fsf@gmail.com> From: Phil Sainty Message-ID: <289c14b9-b95f-295b-e5b0-bb296682a746@orcon.net.nz> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:22:42 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87k1nnoqj1.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-GeoIP: NZ X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 15/09/18 06:57, Robert Pluim wrote: > How about you make it take a prefix argument to get back > 'make-frame-command' semantics (or keep the current ones, and add > 'clone-frame' semantics to the prefix arg)? I don't have an opinion on which behaviour should be the default, but I like the idea of adding such prefix argument behaviour to the C-x 5 2 binding so that users can choose between the two, so +1 to that idea in general. -Phil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Mar 03 07:52:51 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2019 12:52:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58143 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0Qbq-0005IG-P6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 07:52:51 -0500 Received: from mail-it1-f176.google.com ([209.85.166.176]:33291) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0Qbo-0005I3-Ui for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 07:52:49 -0500 Received: by mail-it1-f176.google.com with SMTP id f186so2694960ita.0 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 04:52:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=3sOcq+6PIR/PJb9hKgrDr69cKVY39Y74L9JUrX1PI7s=; b=qZQtPgFkD/D85aiENzzII8VqGpWmhb2tHOlgP//8BqHrNbIr3UvfO9S838SaOw//Jf 0uE6w3gU6ID1x1e2x0QK6RyKztyoabXHeBKCfxLtQvMrSBC1xEUX+8UbrGpMEbwzThXg 41unGuwwW4WoCR0WGeiu7z/Ui7zbMatbIq4J8BuE2xQKyM47hsHU44En7t28kKH7wgMX PH/f62OsK0FcbAxriVbnfY6nBpuG63I3jxSJQCcacBZUsz2arjQYeYRkU7F1QnHVOUzO F9D30L/UVGi2fpT6RE4KZ33pRXMlEIhvCE23iNPpFZEwFBrUVjgybLJGpOZ0cGiYZ5zG hIHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=3sOcq+6PIR/PJb9hKgrDr69cKVY39Y74L9JUrX1PI7s=; b=b08dvGsofZjYhHDX7nn6gjj3si6N+2wPTEs4rTBR2yNoZqsAs14/rT92sLeu5KFZ/D +CQrOpfpM7Ty5qq+0n+GqNZLogtxc9C56wGQLaAUY5fPyAN8m8DcVp39SjcX56eU5Ptx gGG4c7udfAaNczJ7YO/yXCpyaeRV9EhdTXLkvHK6KFcel5hvHb+voUhCZ6C/2HBSIDJT U/p5BDaPHyPcoOZWzGbCG3xIPjSjnw0pFDshm53RoqEBEyQ4DcIu9870k+EdQNulW50R pfz/W0Nyey8T+lIR8flfoSdR8f1nLLS3/1idXzGdXlIRJS2HoHgovYMdQCnW8G9LY75u 18zg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8V1HCYif/1Tmpbn6onGMcEfLzp/RVSdaRKLS3hZ0ZWU9RYCbe vEi1epGqRFtpuur/1Jx+LvsLf8e8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZjkYrNq+9UMgybycogkq5K+hkqpMwnJqgfQZwqxw++8sdANiyLgvS5Gl+rfBC51WIupurHNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:6c3:: with SMTP id z3mr8092729itk.83.1551617563181; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 04:52:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm1758897ite.33.2019.03.03.04.52.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 03 Mar 2019 04:52:42 -0800 (PST) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #34715 Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 07:52:41 -0500 Message-ID: <87ef7ot90m.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) merge 34715 32736 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163048943717895 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 09:43:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLMme-0004eK-S5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 05:43:57 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58396) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLMmY-0004dw-I2; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 05:43:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dTEhqT3QN2FLbdivuM5nv1htqLwZogR68gbPKC3J4Fc=; b=KQ8s8RssrQTnfXC1RT0C3acKIF TrXyW47BOaR/bHG0uItZ68FaiqdkfrQMmM8RjKCqodajOQ75bWihOj5z8CfoVVLBhxi+QoRsM+ATa Ge7hKZOGx4kWTlnGsiErPmQGYMTkHnYdP5tv0i4ypfm0civNO3vS4I3wcZtbD1tzPy0k=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLMmN-0001Tj-BY; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:43:39 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:43:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 2 Mar 2019 16:47:47 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Drew Adams writes: > 1. Add a `clone-frame' command such as this one, which is similar to > what I've been using: > > (defun clone-frame (&optional frame no-clone) I've now added this to Emacs 28 (with some trivial changes) -- bound to `C-x 5 c'. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Drew Adams writes: > 1. Add a `clone-frame' command such as this one, which is similar to > what I've been using: > > (defun clone-frame (&optional frame no-clone) I've now added this to Emacs 28 (with some trivial changes) -- bound to `C-x 5 c'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 01 05:44:13 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 09:44:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLMmn-0004ey-GJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 05:44:13 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:58410) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLMmc-0004e3-Af for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 05:43:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Fw6Wa8ujUNXFYGnMXila7QqyVI+VVOD/XIRJDYUfkz8=; b=hLpXzAgXPgv650FbH7OIDYoL9f ++w42JtSRjtgTKIvAQe6GWrd3iYf+KkjI2uLYWr5Yk/BF3UWn5xmOpu4F2PHIUOdLpuCMsFlIFDy6 CO44ySLz2KnviYGyOmzjDxy4yNqiT7VTxlTge/mthmHp6JBaSAFNxfgPy1tjxBvHGpxI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLMmU-0001UH-6t for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:43:44 +0200 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:43:41 +0200 Message-Id: <871r68fx6a.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #32736 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 32736 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 32736 28.1 quit From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050048321786 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 12:48:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36603 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPeo-0005ey-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:48:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPej-0005ed-B5; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:47:57 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPee-0004Qi-0r; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:47:48 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3439 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPed-0007d0-KG; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:47:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:47:42 +0300 Message-Id: <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:43:34 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:43:34 +0200 > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > > Drew Adams writes: > > > 1. Add a `clone-frame' command such as this one, which is similar to > > what I've been using: > > > > (defun clone-frame (&optional frame no-clone) > > I've now added this to Emacs 28 (with some trivial changes) -- bound to > `C-x 5 c'. Did you try that command in a -nw session? It has some bug with faces. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050080422315 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 12:53:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPk0-0005nm-LQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:53:24 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPjx-0005nS-Vx; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:53:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ytik+NIroPkECaPlEt+w9epnA6ln91ce43GrxVTh5oc=; b=XPm24tExExEAbcjB6whLVqErwD dKvK7BBRONqeyQuaTD+Fz176g2pikjzZTvTNLQPjps0cFaLeqOjAJWbGdE/mzhtjuw0jTeVi7owVY NPioSmmIG3MV7bBfgMWokp164gpX/lwskzkJj8OZc6NYHOkKSINBKfj67SwdSQj11quk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLPjm-0004T9-JY; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:53:10 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:53:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:47:42 +0300") Message-ID: <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Did you try that command in a -nw session? It has some bug with > faces. Nope; didn't try it with -nw, but I see the problem. Any idea what's causing that? Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Did you try that command in a -nw session? It has some bug with > faces. Nope; didn't try it with -nw, but I see the problem. Any idea what's causing that? Here's frame-parameters in the initial frame: ((buried-buffer-list) (buffer-list # #) (name . "F1") (tab-bar-lines . 0) (menu-bar-lines . 1) (unsplittable) (modeline . t) (width . 80) (height . 23) (font . "tty") (background-color . "unspecified-bg") (foreground-color . "unspecified-fg") (scroll-bar-foreground . "white") (cursor-color . "white") (background-mode . dark) (display-type . color) (tty . "/dev/tty") (tty-type . "xterm-256color") (minibuffer . t)) And here's the one after C-x 5 c: ((tab-bar-lines . 0) (menu-bar-lines . 1) (buried-buffer-list #) (buffer-list # #) (unsplittable) (modeline . t) (width . 80) (height . 23) (font . "tty") (background-color . "unspecified-bg") (foreground-color . "unspecified-fg") (name . "F2") (minibuffer . t)) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050354926800 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 13:39:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQSK-0006yB-GD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:39:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQS4-0006xP-Am; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:39:07 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQRy-00075x-Ms; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:38:46 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2751 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQRy-0001A8-9s; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:38:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:38:43 +0300 Message-Id: <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:53:05 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:53:05 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Did you try that command in a -nw session? It has some bug with > > faces. > > Nope; didn't try it with -nw, but I see the problem. Any idea what's > causing that? There are error messages in *Messages* that could give a clue; did you see them? (No, I didn't yet think about that more than 3 sec, so have no ideas yet.) From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050364426978 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 13:40:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQTs-000713-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:40:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60798) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQTo-00070i-13; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:40:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LVviT3nppFil6skLqelW5B0a+yumMAKbjiFFkOmwcn4=; b=LZWH8JyRd4P2iuWq/fdfULDXWY B5jiSaoYN1fP+LJFLIKS0t3C69d+bLZKWqNaZvsuAUIPi+t6E9Ezwvw8iz4wsuJlGR4asKFiE7wr/ 9vgIqKheTxmZHmRyewHwk5RMouWKAPRkKEDcTC2bcNRJe74oqWuWMtHlfj/bA0Ga+Ts8=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQTc-0000pj-PY; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:40:33 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:40:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:38:43 +0300") Message-ID: <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > There are error messages in *Messages* that could give a clue; did you > see them? (No, I didn't yet think about that more than 3 sec, so have > no ideas yet.) Ah, didn't notice the messages: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > There are error messages in *Messages* that could give a clue; did you > see them? (No, I didn't yet think about that more than 3 sec, so have > no ideas yet.) Ah, didn't notice the messages: Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-delimiter-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-delimiter-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-delimiter-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-delimiter-face Invalid face reference: font-lock-comment-face Invalid face reference: mode-line-buffer-id Invalid face reference: minibuffer-prompt [7 times] Invalid face reference: mode-line-buffer-id [2 times] So basically all the fonts are gone? Well, that's a clue; I'll try to debug... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050373127148 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:43:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 13:42:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQVH-00073l-3D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:42:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQVE-00073W-NV; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:42:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/e0o8XffAl+WC4IOhhJXMuXUMtPKSy3Y6BMXTGgQIE0=; b=AQpOvyt5sCrwDEZY6wdU23okIi aUn7nTdUhJLtp8EHl1RMeWE6IgrRQJCoKTsp087x7Px6Em6W1zdf3QG4vEX7WUEDruOdPIjs3wqfp SdUZ1pZELXZXMK/yLGjyveUUjc7JoIHx2/qOWKHmcaMu9Xiv0sUciC77KqTDMAAwfhzc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQV3-0000zD-B3; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:42:01 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:41:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:40:26 +0200") Message-ID: <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So basically all the fonts are gone? Well, that's a clue; I'll try to > debug... (I mean faces.) Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > So basically all the fonts are gone? Well, that's a clue; I'll try to > debug... (I mean faces.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050454430364 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 13:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 13:55:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38695 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQiO-0007tf-Ij for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:55:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQiN-0007qO-GC; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:55:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TgHHOZzwpYVgJEbw+Kv6RjNKoYF4sEUhxVGNIA4sT9A=; b=GB2ZLtRla5HoLO866/PBxB4oWY xZbEpXNSpj2PHkSi5vRz2ZF6JOqmIE0GsjSsHeLar8oWTDbHbnQ0d6vVRogqk4WpD3mT4roMAU4ZI OskDzSRArg4Ww39fUadF9qYbS6ET8W7d09iGjIhRIvGfYOfLysb7LfDUkHL9+1pjByNk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQiC-0002Qq-Ph; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:55:36 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:55:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:41:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: If I filter out the `name' and `background-color' elements, then it works. I can kinda see the first one, but... Hm... no, it's `background-color' in combination with something else; just background-color works fine. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) If I filter out the `name' and `background-color' elements, then it works. I can kinda see the first one, but... Hm... no, it's `background-color' in combination with something else; just background-color works fine. I wonder whether this is points to a bug somewhere in the tty frame mechanism... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.16305054927883 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 14:11:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxW-00022s-BJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxU-00022b-Rl; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:21 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxP-0004Dc-J7; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:15 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4824 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQxN-0002xA-DW; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:11:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:11:08 +0300 Message-Id: <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:55:29 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:55:29 +0200 > > If I filter out the `name' and `background-color' elements, then it > works. I can kinda see the first one, but... > > Hm... no, it's `background-color' in combination with something else; > just background-color works fine. > > I wonder whether this is points to a bug somewhere in the tty frame > mechanism... If the problem is background-color, why does redisplay complain about faces saying they are *invalid*? I could understand if it said it cannot load some color, but why "invalid face"? The only funky thing about background-color on TTY I can think of is the unspecified-bg thingy. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050590916807 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:19:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 14:18:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLR4O-0004N0-N1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:18:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32874) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLR4N-0004Mk-IM; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:18:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VI6hL9/Klgw+P5hbTXUM6IhCJlaM8WVeq3mNNAeN1Rw=; b=CcV/HbfMjtRKXPPq+rIQ613DZu 4A4Gny006wwWgSQneMV1dHEKnWc0zaxnezXk35IrJi+Toh9NtPYp7oWWfzWZLYtQdamIzGfhuHZ1d 64uV48y0nzR6N6F0mt65iwyPwqhyOYjksPozpHiQu91i7msdWQSWcL0DbLzeuT7aqk18=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLR4C-0004o2-PJ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:18:21 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:18:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 17:11:08 +0300") Message-ID: <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > If the problem is background-color, why does redisplay complain about > faces saying they are *invalid*? I could understand if it said it > cannot load some color, but why "invalid face"? > > The on [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > If the problem is background-color, why does redisplay complain about > faces saying they are *invalid*? I could understand if it said it > cannot load some color, but why "invalid face"? > > The only funky thing about background-color on TTY I can think of is > the unspecified-bg thingy. The following is the minimal case for reproduction here: (let ((default-frame-alist '((background-color . "red")))) (make-frame)) This reliably makes all the faces go AWOL on the new frame. (It doesn't matter what the colour is.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163050652017827 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 14:28:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38768 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLREG-0004dR-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:28:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLREE-0004dB-Fl; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:28:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=liqk80TmUFdpKAvvfYfoMuaLmJyGY8Vt6YpHX+M3zyM=; b=eVCMigf1gRr3j1MwBrf/ydYLI1 WcgFJ5wKeeqbiuI3frXXiZVIDWjaBJ5rqqeC0PnQm59ELJVsvFl1VHkyDd0TWDUOeiBhZp909YFVh G1CmoR6FOMrUpQ5lO9obbfpQaGQOogZhNLy/wwmcVPIkANbnAQ/FaMhz2X2mYAWCk7/w=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLRE3-0005r5-KT; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:28:32 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:28:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:18:13 +0200") Message-ID: <87r1e8cquw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > (let ((default-frame-alist > '((background-color . "red")))) > (make-frame)) > > This reliably makes all the faces go AWOL on the new frame. (It doesn't > matter what the colour is.) Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > (let ((default-frame-alist > '((background-color . "red")))) > (make-frame)) > > This reliably makes all the faces go AWOL on the new frame. (It doesn't > matter what the colour is.) And it is indeed the problem. If I remove this: if (EQ (prop, Qforeground_color) || EQ (prop, Qbackground_color)) update_face_from_frame_parameter (f, prop, val); Then the faces aren't destroyed... So the bug is in update_face_from_frame_parameter somewhere, I think. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163051187027425 (code B ref 32736); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 15:57:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38886 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLScO-000783-Lc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:57:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLScL-00077k-Jl; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:57:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLScG-0002YV-8M; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:57:32 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3439 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLScC-0008Bo-J1; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:57:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:57:23 +0300 Message-Id: <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:18:13 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:18:13 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If the problem is background-color, why does redisplay complain about > > faces saying they are *invalid*? I could understand if it said it > > cannot load some color, but why "invalid face"? > > > > The only funky thing about background-color on TTY I can think of is > > the unspecified-bg thingy. > > The following is the minimal case for reproduction here: > > (let ((default-frame-alist > '((background-color . "red")))) > (make-frame)) > > This reliably makes all the faces go AWOL on the new frame. (It doesn't > matter what the colour is.) Shouldn't we copy the parameters alist? Maybe even deep-copy? And faces are supposed to be frame-local, so maybe faces also need to be copied? Otherwise, you are basically manipulating faces that don't "belong" to the frame, no? And likewise with frame's parameters alist, I think. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163056868623065 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 07:44:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhOr-0005zs-Kb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:44:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhOl-0005zU-FX; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:44:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=11AHI/2Oz8Bx6YjT1Xe4mRbTVBqcbCg9Ix07P3DLq2o=; b=XQbUglYv0O/3YXxkkUJrLVvzdB jOWJiOhzLrKjCJAN2yHeXTTgdS+gp0P+riwAzPDo6LjbjhIv7ptzAWRcohSlJGfcjN2WKY+e+ieTm q9BODucJvfQ6BRcp87TvejhDH/+SnkbP5Zqim6yfGGuZ7EMjqP5LilTRt5erdNKerKHM=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhOa-0004uy-Iq; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:44:28 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:44:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:57:23 +0300") Message-ID: <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The following is the minimal case for reproduction here: >> >> (let ((default-frame-alist >> '((background-color . "red")))) >> (make-frame)) >> >> This reliably makes all the faces go AWOL on the [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The following is the minimal case for reproduction here: >> >> (let ((default-frame-alist >> '((background-color . "red")))) >> (make-frame)) >> >> This reliably makes all the faces go AWOL on the new frame. (It doesn't >> matter what the colour is.) > > Shouldn't we copy the parameters alist? Maybe even deep-copy? Do you mean in this particular test case or in `clone-frame'? If it's the latter, the list we get is fresh (but not very deep). If it's this particular test case, then I don't understand what you mean. > And faces are supposed to be frame-local, so maybe faces also need to > be copied? Otherwise, you are basically manipulating faces that don't > "belong" to the frame, no? And likewise with frame's parameters > alist, I think. Anyway, debugging further shows that the problem seems to be in `frame-set-background-mode', but I've yet to isolate what exactly is triggering the bug. (dolist (face (face-list)) (and (not (get face 'face-override-spec)) [...] (face-spec-match-p face (face-user-default-spec face) frame))) (push face locally-modified-faces))) ;; Now change to the new frame parameters (modify-frame-parameters frame params) ;; For all unmodified named faces, choose face specs ;; matching the new frame parameters. (dolist (face (face-list)) (unless (memq face locally-modified-faces) (face-spec-recalc face frame))))))))) The face-spec-recalc messes up the face... but so does the call to face-spec-match-p, apparently? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163056908832234 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:52:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 07:51:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVQ-0008Np-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVP-0008Na-Lk; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:27 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVK-0008J8-DW; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:22 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2429 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVK-0000Kx-0t; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:51:18 +0300 Message-Id: <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:44:24 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:44:24 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Shouldn't we copy the parameters alist? Maybe even deep-copy? > > Do you mean in this particular test case or in `clone-frame'? If it's > the latter, the list we get is fresh (but not very deep). You mean, we get a fresh list because of the call to seq-filter? (Which btw means we now need to preload seq.el?) Is that guaranteed to return a copy of the original alist? And the faces aren't copied, I think, they reference the same faces the original frame had. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.16305697006294 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 08:01:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhfI-0001dB-CB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:01:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhfH-0001Y0-3w; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:01:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hzDOVV1mUBut6yGQ5+XNi0nixEHJysb6DHBwPSTRbII=; b=ab2CovueLzRrz9Y/yeJHv5GR// nYVtLTL23xO3HMr6ePAYnIfNmROdZBAcxgSQvOpxhuJMvuWlK20nCX/NXKxen76oEGb3s3aiZUWWa gEfHoYjSNP4qSTpbfojqUCbRdogoukdxsTnF9e0bi0UxNt8mdIuf1lynUucXphmg13wE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhf6-0006c0-8K; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:01:32 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:01:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:51:18 +0300") Message-ID: <87fsun8kyw.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > You mean, we get a fresh list because of the call to seq-filter? No, because of this: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > You mean, we get a fresh list because of the call to seq-filter? No, because of this: DEFUN ("frame-parameters", Fframe_parameters, Sframe_parameters, 0, 1, 0, doc: /* Return the parameters-alist of frame FRAME. [...] alist = Fcopy_alist (f->param_alist); > (Which btw means we now need to preload seq.el?) No, it's autoloaded. > And the faces aren't copied, I think, they reference the same faces > the original frame had. Right -- I don't really know how the face/frame stuff actually works. If it was a very general problem, then surely we'd stumble across this whenever we make a new frame. But the bug seems to manifest only on terminal frames -- when we change the background mode. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163057078719382 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 08:19:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39702 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhwp-00052X-8w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:19:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50302) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhwn-00052G-NV; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:19:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhwh-0006cM-BR; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:19:39 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4407 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhwg-0003II-8D; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:19:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 11:19:34 +0300 Message-Id: <83v93jo0dl.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87fsun8kyw.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:01:27 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsun8kyw.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:01:27 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > You mean, we get a fresh list because of the call to seq-filter? > > No, because of this: > > DEFUN ("frame-parameters", Fframe_parameters, Sframe_parameters, 0, 1, 0, > doc: /* Return the parameters-alist of frame FRAME. > > [...] > alist = Fcopy_alist (f->param_alist); Ah, right. > > (Which btw means we now need to preload seq.el?) > > No, it's autoloaded. But frame.el is preloaded, so won't that get in the way during bootstrap? > > And the faces aren't copied, I think, they reference the same faces > > the original frame had. > > Right -- I don't really know how the face/frame stuff actually works. > If it was a very general problem, then surely we'd stumble across this > whenever we make a new frame. But the bug seems to manifest only on > terminal frames -- when we change the background mode. That's true, but it doesn't mean we don't have a deeper problem. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163057305631315 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 08:57:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLiXQ-000890-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:57:36 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLiXO-00088l-S1; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 04:57:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QL7ak+LtvvXxDlh6E90K14B12X9RvbxGEGy6pXNZMoU=; b=q5GyWH0QRgElSmXThqBIQAzUnV 8xyQYPvk3fSsZ3Ze1q3nZjnc1osiDDdsURAI0O30+JDGZr2aJblCFF8gExqypZQabVcHdTMWQUBhp e2fl8YV3hqatHuAodly4j2H+UuBBuYN78fxwFlm46EEBJ5GIpx8Z4xpayvGUkhun+co8=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLiXE-0003oH-Sh; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:57:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsun8kyw.fsf@gnus.org> <83v93jo0dl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:57:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83v93jo0dl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Sep 2021 11:19:34 +0300") Message-ID: <87mtov73t7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > (Which btw means we now need to preload seq.el?) >> >> No, it's autoloaded. > > But frame.el is preloaded, so won't that get in the way during > bootstrap? It won't get loaded until the user uses the `C-x 5 c' command. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > (Which btw means we now need to preload seq.el?) >> >> No, it's autoloaded. > > But frame.el is preloaded, so won't that get in the way during > bootstrap? It won't get loaded until the user uses the `C-x 5 c' command. >> > And the faces aren't copied, I think, they reference the same faces >> > the original frame had. >> >> Right -- I don't really know how the face/frame stuff actually works. >> If it was a very general problem, then surely we'd stumble across this >> whenever we make a new frame. But the bug seems to manifest only on >> terminal frames -- when we change the background mode. > > That's true, but it doesn't mean we don't have a deeper problem. True. I'll continue to debug this, but won't have time today, I think... If you want to have a look meanwhile, please go ahead. :-) It reproduces easily, and the bug seems to be caused by something called by `frame-set-background-mode', but that may or may not be correct (perhaps it's just doing something that triggers the real problem caused somewhere else). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.16305842571252 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 12:04:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLlS1-0000K1-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:04:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38920) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLlRv-0000Jf-Qq; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:04:11 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLlRq-0008Vz-ET; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:04:02 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2372 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLlRq-0000wj-5v; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 08:04:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:03:58 +0300 Message-Id: <83mtovnpzl.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87mtov73t7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:57:24 +0200) References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsun8kyw.fsf@gnus.org> <83v93jo0dl.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtov73t7.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:57:24 +0200 > > >> > And the faces aren't copied, I think, they reference the same faces > >> > the original frame had. > >> > >> Right -- I don't really know how the face/frame stuff actually works. > >> If it was a very general problem, then surely we'd stumble across this > >> whenever we make a new frame. But the bug seems to manifest only on > >> terminal frames -- when we change the background mode. > > > > That's true, but it doesn't mean we don't have a deeper problem. > > True. I'll continue to debug this, but won't have time today, I > think... If you want to have a look meanwhile, please go ahead. :-) > It reproduces easily, and the bug seems to be caused by something called > by `frame-set-background-mode', but that may or may not be correct > (perhaps it's just doing something that triggers the real problem caused > somewhere else). I think I fixed this. The problem was indeed with letting the new frame manipulate a separate set of faces: we arrange for that in make-terminal-frame, but we were doing that a tad too late. From unknown Tue Jun 17 22:11:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 16:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.16305987441711 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 16:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 16:05:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41853 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLpDk-0000RW-2h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:05:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:46784) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLpDi-0000RC-Sw; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:05:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BBin4D490Z63xXFwipp6MB23tgdxSs2Ik//kiM+qvIY=; b=L0udAssUlLCBXPVcfrefPlzgOH yQl6Py1ZONOzthLjYezWpMk76vmGhhNEVXkZSpC4n6R0Ig8QR+1c0QYJuqAfb+Mfa/T0/3OzCVEVr VqpaNpsNguf09Mk3LHF5RU8c5FUkyCRMFUScjlhIyvysnl4vTuV7K3v5p3LttVLd557U=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLpDY-0005ea-7V; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 18:05:36 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsun8kyw.fsf@gnus.org> <83v93jo0dl.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtov73t7.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtovnpzl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 18:05:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mtovnpzl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:03:58 +0300") Message-ID: <874kb36jzo.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think I fixed this. The problem was indeed with letting the new > frame manipulate a separate set of faces: we arrange for that in > make-terminal-frame, but we were doing that a tad too late. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think I fixed this. The problem was indeed with letting the new > frame manipulate a separate set of faces: we arrange for that in > make-terminal-frame, but we were doing that a tad too late. Ah, I see! And I can confirm that this fixes the problem here, too. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no