GNU bug report logs - #32607
27.0.50; pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32607: closed (27.0.50; pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select)
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:48:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:47:14 +0300
with message-id <87lg86e6cd.fsf <at> mail.linkov.net>
and subject line Re: bug#32607: 27.0.50; pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32607,
regarding 27.0.50; pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
32607: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32607
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 27.0.50; pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 01:32:12 +0300

Suppose we have such customization:

  (setq display-buffer-alist '(("\\`\\*grep\\*\\'" display-buffer-same-window)))

Now after running grep with a non-empty output in ‘emacs -Q’,
typing ‘C-o’ (compilation-display-error) will display two identical
buffers instead of displaying the buffer with the found grep hit.

The problem is with pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select.
I wonder what is an idiomatic way to ensure a buffer is already
displayed in some window, to not display the same buffer
in other window?

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 32607-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#32607: 27.0.50; pop-to-buffer in next-error-no-select
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:47:14 +0300

>> All that I understood from this thread, is that since next-error-no-select
>> window juggling involves two windows, it has to override the same-window
>> user customization using display-buffer-overriding-action.  Currently
>> I see no other solution that don't involve more fundamental changes.
>
> Agreed.  Let's install the 'display-buffer-overriding-action' change
> and leave it there.

OK, done.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.