From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:24:58 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 32583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 32583@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.153562265818319 (code B ref -1); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:51:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2018 09:50:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbL-0004lN-IB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbK-0004lA-Lw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbE-0001Ig-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbD-0001ID-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbA-0002vT-7k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJVa-0006Vg-OT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:45:01 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:45708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJVa-0006UY-1a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:44:58 -0400 Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz [62.23.167.188]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bf1a6e41 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:42:37 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:44:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Reported by Ludovic on IRC. Some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built. Plus, starttime and stoptime don't make sense. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- snape: i just noticed something fishy: https://berlin.guixsd.org/build/467599 is marked as failed [11:24] however, /gnu/store/nr0w89qymmnfbcb9vw9q86p0a4v1h6w2-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv has never been built so it's not even a dependency-failed situation i wonder if this could be a regression in Cuirass it has "starttime":0,"stoptime":1535613271 [11:25] which normally cannot happen (starttime shouldn't be 0 i stoptime= is not 0) civodul: indeed it's weird [11:27] civodul: how do you know /gnu/store/nr0w89qymmnfbcb9vw9q86p0a4v1h6w2-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv has never been built? [11:28] well, I guess because there is no log [11:32] snape: yes and i ssh'd into berlin civodul: it builds if you spawn it manually? [11:37] snape: i didn't let it run to completion because i wanted us to be able to debug it [11:39] but most likely it does [11:40] (i tested with /gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv, which was another build marked as failed) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Cl=C3=A9ment From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:24:58 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 23:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 32583@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32583.153584490912358 (code B ref 32583); Sat, 01 Sep 2018 23:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 32583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2018 23:35:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fwFQ5-0003DG-Bh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 19:35:09 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:53640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fwFQ3-0003D6-Gc for 32583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2018 19:35:08 -0400 Received: from rodion (192.168.0.254 [192.168.0.254]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 12d11b46 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Sat, 1 Sep 2018 23:32:19 +0000 (UTC) References: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 01:35:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87d0twlrkm.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > Reported by Ludovic on IRC. > > Some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built. Plus, > starttime and stoptime don't make sense. > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > snape: i just noticed something fishy: > https://berlin.guixsd.org/build/467599 is marked as failed > [11:24] > however, > /gnu/store/nr0w89qymmnfbcb9vw9q86p0a4v1h6w2-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv has > never been built > so it's not even a dependency-failed situation > i wonder if this could be a regression in Cuirass > it has "starttime":0,"stoptime":1535613271 [11:25] > which normally cannot happen (starttime shouldn't be 0 i stopti= me is > not 0) > civodul: indeed it's weird [11:27] > civodul: how do you know > /gnu/store/nr0w89qymmnfbcb9vw9q86p0a4v1h6w2-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv has > never been built? [11:28] > well, I guess because there is no log [11:32] > snape: yes and i ssh'd into berlin > civodul: it builds if you spawn it manually? [11:37] > snape: i didn't let it run to completion because i wanted us to= be > able to debug it [11:39] > but most likely it does [11:40] > (i tested with > /gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv, which > was another build marked as failed) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Cl=C3=A9ment This is from the logs: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- 2018-08-30T09:14:31 batch of builds (partially) failed:build of `/gnu/store/06yy5cl59baa6iczvcrl7gzbs82x5j30-cleanup.drv', `/gnu/store/0ilx18r8s4rw00kxynn6nida1grggx46-separate-store-os.drv', `/gnu/store/0n887pl0igppd7mr1hh2zrc889sfbh5h-dovecot-test.drv', `/gnu/store/0qad25im46dnqwfcd63k2lljgd7h9gy2-dicod.drv', `/gnu/store/0y5yb81mx5m98ddmbvhivhyszd5mh1bi-encrypted-root-os.drv', `/gnu/store/1af46bw6km0qd6mvm63xsx10f0ipyy2x-nfs.drv', `/gnu/store/1b28w2c9bgsjnypmnwyl5bnq7yc8k3pv-btrfs-root-os.drv', `/gnu/store/1vv5wp52l1wbfg45b0a44fs9icx31m8f-encrypted-root-os.drv', `/gnu/store/2149hi6f7gccn5x8cbgdx8w7sgadp1h0-basic.drv', `/gnu/store/21i0ylg5p3q1s6qg395vyr55n64hkbil-separate-home-os.drv', `/gnu/store/228h2p10ysd7n4cw3fwg1n7aj0k4xmrr-raid-root-os.drv', `/gnu/store/2a4gsnndyslw7cwg9rjc5yhqhkpfag6w-libparserutils-0.2.4.drv', `/gnu/store/2i8xq16s6bcwnxfpn7l6yq9jyip3ayxc-installed-extlinux-os.drv', `/gnu/store/2lp48f2jdjampri0g9137qcz6ra4v5n3-mongodb-test.drv', `/gnu/store/2zvk8ml5ankw0mbq6m693p4a9ppx7x83-exim-test.drv', `/gnu/store/3dzssjfjzy5nngfm0cbg747lw2sddfvv-mcron.drv', `/gnu/store/43pdwcgm49vs4grfzkw1n4mg7hhc0ih5-libvirt-test.drv', `/gnu/store/4li2cm5igrcrkis8b4ilipf9823zy2h1-iso-image-installer.drv', `/gnu/store/4w8hbibw77vxr5iwf1avgf0y95l4fwwd-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv', `/gnu/store/56cz6yfy5s8w95kqxhgrry4iymx9zdbq-hubbub-0.3.5.drv', [...] `/gnu/store/w83xmggaj5qxzfafnv1pyhff24s2c40m-installed-os.drv', `/gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv', `/gnu/store/wqpy6m5kf4wmnjhdqqwfyyx6n0nis06s-libdom-0.3.3.drv', `/gnu/store/x2k166lqcmwad0mli8qsrql9a4vsrq45-installed-extlinux-os.drv', `/gnu/store/x6v7bdvcvfbny1kdgsq6jilbszrfksbc-libcss-0.8.0.drv', `/gnu/store/xg4dzxz54qpf678syvf4379vbps1wqhs-tailon-test.drv', `/gnu/store/y08j1qivdlam0kp1w636f4lycnmm866v-disk-image.drv', `/gnu/store/ya89cfswkgv7m3az3rzmbggy433lg288-libvirt-test.drv', `/gnu/store/ya9q9x208fif1ci4pbsfm7vyk39znzmh-memcached-test.drv', `/gnu/store/yhc1liighrcsgl1smpwrdahy3xrj4zd6-libnsutils-0.0.5.drv', `/gnu/store/ykhlibxssbg42r2cfyzm65gkkjyqky7h-opensmtpd-test.drv', `/gnu/store/yxv7ny3v4ng41rvhd0r245lnr4nwwch4-raid-root-os.drv', `/gnu/store/zdakqvwx1na7p8c8ivacz4wlcm6pbdh6-dicod.drv' failed (status: 100) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So it seems that the daemon tried to build them, but they all failed. Probably at that point the log file weren't created. I don't really understand why you were able to build /gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv manually then. 'starttime =3D=3D 0 && stoptime !=3D 0' is explained by the fact the except= ion (from 'build-derivations&'?) was thrown before 'handle-build-event' was called (which should have set starttime), and later on '(update-build-statuses! store batch)' was called, which only sets stoptime (because the output is invalid). Any idea? Cl=C3=A9ment From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:24:58 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 32583@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32583.15358991998103 (code B ref 32583); Sun, 02 Sep 2018 14:40:02 +0000 Received: (at 32583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2018 14:39:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fwTXj-00026d-69 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:39:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fwTXh-00026O-4K for 32583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:39:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwTXb-0005sv-4f for 32583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:39:52 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwTXb-0005sl-1H; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:39:51 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=40542 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fwTXa-0004NH-Q9; Sun, 02 Sep 2018 10:39:50 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> <87d0twlrkm.fsf@lassieur.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 Fructidor an 226 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 16:39:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d0twlrkm.fsf@lassieur.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Sun, 02 Sep 2018 01:35:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87d0tw7ykq.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > This is from the logs: > > 2018-08-30T09:14:31 batch of builds (partially) failed:build of > `/gnu/store/06yy5cl59baa6iczvcrl7gzbs82x5j30-cleanup.drv', > `/gnu/store/0ilx18r8s4rw00kxynn6nida1grggx46-separate-store-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/0n887pl0igppd7mr1hh2zrc889sfbh5h-dovecot-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/0qad25im46dnqwfcd63k2lljgd7h9gy2-dicod.drv', > `/gnu/store/0y5yb81mx5m98ddmbvhivhyszd5mh1bi-encrypted-root-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/1af46bw6km0qd6mvm63xsx10f0ipyy2x-nfs.drv', > `/gnu/store/1b28w2c9bgsjnypmnwyl5bnq7yc8k3pv-btrfs-root-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/1vv5wp52l1wbfg45b0a44fs9icx31m8f-encrypted-root-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/2149hi6f7gccn5x8cbgdx8w7sgadp1h0-basic.drv', > `/gnu/store/21i0ylg5p3q1s6qg395vyr55n64hkbil-separate-home-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/228h2p10ysd7n4cw3fwg1n7aj0k4xmrr-raid-root-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/2a4gsnndyslw7cwg9rjc5yhqhkpfag6w-libparserutils-0.2.4.drv', > `/gnu/store/2i8xq16s6bcwnxfpn7l6yq9jyip3ayxc-installed-extlinux-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/2lp48f2jdjampri0g9137qcz6ra4v5n3-mongodb-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/2zvk8ml5ankw0mbq6m693p4a9ppx7x83-exim-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/3dzssjfjzy5nngfm0cbg747lw2sddfvv-mcron.drv', > `/gnu/store/43pdwcgm49vs4grfzkw1n4mg7hhc0ih5-libvirt-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/4li2cm5igrcrkis8b4ilipf9823zy2h1-iso-image-installer.drv', > `/gnu/store/4w8hbibw77vxr5iwf1avgf0y95l4fwwd-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv', > `/gnu/store/56cz6yfy5s8w95kqxhgrry4iymx9zdbq-hubbub-0.3.5.drv', > [...] > `/gnu/store/w83xmggaj5qxzfafnv1pyhff24s2c40m-installed-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv', > `/gnu/store/wqpy6m5kf4wmnjhdqqwfyyx6n0nis06s-libdom-0.3.3.drv', > `/gnu/store/x2k166lqcmwad0mli8qsrql9a4vsrq45-installed-extlinux-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/x6v7bdvcvfbny1kdgsq6jilbszrfksbc-libcss-0.8.0.drv', > `/gnu/store/xg4dzxz54qpf678syvf4379vbps1wqhs-tailon-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/y08j1qivdlam0kp1w636f4lycnmm866v-disk-image.drv', > `/gnu/store/ya89cfswkgv7m3az3rzmbggy433lg288-libvirt-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/ya9q9x208fif1ci4pbsfm7vyk39znzmh-memcached-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/yhc1liighrcsgl1smpwrdahy3xrj4zd6-libnsutils-0.0.5.drv', > `/gnu/store/ykhlibxssbg42r2cfyzm65gkkjyqky7h-opensmtpd-test.drv', > `/gnu/store/yxv7ny3v4ng41rvhd0r245lnr4nwwch4-raid-root-os.drv', > `/gnu/store/zdakqvwx1na7p8c8ivacz4wlcm6pbdh6-dicod.drv' > failed (status: 100) > > So it seems that the daemon tried to build them, but they all failed. > Probably at that point the log file weren't created. > > I don't really understand why you were able to build > /gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv manually > then. It could be that the failure above is due to an offloading timeout (I=E2=80= =99ve seen =E2=80=98guix offload=E2=80=99 hang occasionally before on berlin, and a708de151c255712071e42e5c8284756b51768cd turned those into timeouts reported as transient failures.) So we may have a bug where things get =E2=80=9Cstuck=E2=80=9D for some reason. > 'starttime =3D=3D 0 && stoptime !=3D 0' is explained by the fact the exce= ption > (from 'build-derivations&'?) was thrown before 'handle-build-event' was > called (which should have set starttime), and later on > '(update-build-statuses! store batch)' was called, which only sets > stoptime (because the output is invalid). I wonder if we should get rid of =E2=80=98update-build-statuses!=E2=80=99: = if a build fails, then we get a =E2=80=98build-failure=E2=80=99 event and we already u= pdate the build status at that point, right? WDYT? Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:24:58 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32583 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32583@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 32583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32583.154270777530589 (code B ref 32583); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 32583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2018 09:56:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gP2lS-0007xI-Ob for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 04:56:14 -0500 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:40434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gP2lR-0007xB-8L for 32583@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 04:56:13 -0500 Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz [62.23.167.188]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7d965ef8 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:56:12 +0000 (UTC) References: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> <87d0twlrkm.fsf@lassieur.org> <87d0tw7ykq.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <87d0tw7ykq.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:56:11 +0100 Message-ID: <878t1o6pj8.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sorry to reply that late. I think be489a26c0e6a5f23a48142a87728a0ec8bc3c9c fixed this. Can we close it? Thank you, Cl=C3=A9ment From unknown Mon Jun 23 11:24:58 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: bug#32583: closed (Re: bug#32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built) Message-ID: References: <87h8gbzzoj.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 32583 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 32583@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:45:01 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1542717901-22504-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1542717901-22504-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 32583@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 32583: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D32583 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1542717901-22504-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 32583-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2018 12:44:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33447 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gP5OA-0005pq-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:44:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gP5O8-0005pb-Ti for 32583-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:44:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gP5O3-0006Qd-98 for 32583-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:44:15 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gP5O3-0006QZ-4w; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:44:15 -0500 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=44752 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gP5O2-00007L-TB; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:44:15 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: bug#32583: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built References: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> <87d0twlrkm.fsf@lassieur.org> <87d0tw7ykq.fsf@gnu.org> <878t1o6pj8.fsf@lassieur.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 30 Brumaire an 227 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:44:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878t1o6pj8.fsf@lassieur.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:56:11 +0100") Message-ID: <87h8gbzzoj.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32583-done Cc: 32583-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > Sorry to reply that late. I think > be489a26c0e6a5f23a48142a87728a0ec8bc3c9c fixed this. Can we close it? Yep, done! Ludo'. ------------=_1542717901-22504-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2018 09:50:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37915 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbL-0004lN-IB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41053) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbK-0004lA-Lw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbE-0001Ig-6s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46170) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbD-0001ID-Jx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJbA-0002vT-7k for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:50:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJVa-0006Vg-OT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:45:01 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:45708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fvJVa-0006UY-1a for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 05:44:58 -0400 Received: from newt (smtp.parrot.biz [62.23.167.188]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bf1a6e41 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:42:37 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Cuirass: some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:44:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhx41949.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) Reported by Ludovic on IRC. Some builds are marked as failed, but they were never built. Plus, starttime and stoptime don't make sense. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- snape: i just noticed something fishy: https://berlin.guixsd.org/build/467599 is marked as failed [11:24] however, /gnu/store/nr0w89qymmnfbcb9vw9q86p0a4v1h6w2-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv has never been built so it's not even a dependency-failed situation i wonder if this could be a regression in Cuirass it has "starttime":0,"stoptime":1535613271 [11:25] which normally cannot happen (starttime shouldn't be 0 i stoptime= is not 0) civodul: indeed it's weird [11:27] civodul: how do you know /gnu/store/nr0w89qymmnfbcb9vw9q86p0a4v1h6w2-libsvgtiny-0.1.7.drv has never been built? [11:28] well, I guess because there is no log [11:32] snape: yes and i ssh'd into berlin civodul: it builds if you spawn it manually? [11:37] snape: i didn't let it run to completion because i wanted us to be able to debug it [11:39] but most likely it does [11:40] (i tested with /gnu/store/wgk46pv09m1y8b7iq5fbkhay5hs6hnmr-libcss-0.8.0.drv, which was another build marked as failed) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Cl=C3=A9ment ------------=_1542717901-22504-1--