From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:26 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#32540 <32540@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#32540 <32540@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Cuirass: we need a way to manually trigger evaluations Reply-To: bug#32540 <32540@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:57:26 +0000 retitle 32540 Cuirass: we need a way to manually trigger evaluations reassign 32540 guix submitter 32540 Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur severity 32540 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 27 05:53:50 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2018 09:53:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEDW-0003p9-7H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:53:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEDU-0003os-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:53:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEDO-0001yR-4M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:53:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:45762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEDN-0001xU-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:53:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEDK-00016p-C1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:53:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEAC-00077n-Jg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:50:27 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:45344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEAC-00076n-7v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 05:50:24 -0400 Received: from rodion (88.191.118.83 [88.191.118.83]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c4229c27 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:48:35 +0000 (UTC) User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Cuirass: we need a way to manually trigger evaluations Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:50:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87h8jgb0ki.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) The 'core-updates' and 'staging' branches shouldn't trigger evaluations at each commit, because they produce too many derivations. Instead, the admins should have a 'trigger evaluation' button that they use once in a while. That button should be part of an 'admin interface', which should be protected by NGINX's 'auth_basic' authentication mechanism. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 27 06:18:00 2018 Received: (at 32540) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2018 10:18:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEau-0004VL-78 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:18:00 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:36826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuEap-0004V3-KN for 32540@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:17:58 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q5-v6so9142562iop.3 for <32540@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 03:17:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2O4J9sgleQocZoazPumeiyQ+CYhspVTkilhqc4rcpXs=; b=lQ2Z1hTdjYEJ7f81hJTJmSrAp2Vk3U07+tONrr2GFRSx6vm2CDse9mYwTMCMhWIyMw EqDyE/zyOyd53TWrKuD5LeDx+LxNU3BEgp1zO3A7aX/Iw5dNov63BUk7nmsYBcXTnPKb I2l/HO2MVpKevXHhSmX+fX+rJfcfXVYbThPY1K3ldWeYhQEyjs+wV75alCtyTl8YYYg6 CHBuAMbHvIymeTdVn6A0UC65/QW0/CRlG9x5Tw4Yfi3T/yfupDokhTHNYK1Qidjcnc6C ulbAouGWDRNO2B1p6d68ft1UoBcE3NIBcW7m27K1Fm9iOt/cvuL046WM70eWm+wiONrR kbdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2O4J9sgleQocZoazPumeiyQ+CYhspVTkilhqc4rcpXs=; b=BkfaLC20RkH1qPSlpwZz64/M4gZTpQnRgIHHPo+76FnsE6DxiNS6aDYPFg1ZHM6SEC PI/bfqNng1FyRdDLqZP3JJfNlsLZTGP91OwiTMW1I9LB15Kvm6wucVRbb2b7XhPTNtFw Qg9usPAjbY8+KGBvNzjwiViHf6bD5HkfrCNCSXHhfu9lLKZQZS5sklU4b9VeSHZgStPr mAn6qWfuE3YEnD2bW3qnYQ6E8Mhcl9Sh3A6iyEDzB3PpYc+IYWl6iYZ1Pjrey950yU0E 5UmkV8V3Ng4JpWq30B85YmTyvNdi3sN5LfFK+xA341pZmv0g239hsKqgMrKjVCFjKYI6 nXNw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BBqYyVZkltdxcilC8twatpkhRwQjznDyBiaAkpZYK52uPg/j0I 7MFCFKawQ6vGwN5MmrBHKp6fKP/PBgQmJZVuFA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdanZy+xKZhWw0xSRjVCpBHLXiwfsODD+EYEb9Cuc0vPCAuaECWEXpOx44BeQ0WgTkn2M0lq8ehwGtuQHxPjwvo= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e010:: with SMTP id z16-v6mr9605318iog.44.1535365069999; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 03:17:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87h8jgb0ki.fsf@lassieur.org> In-Reply-To: <87h8jgb0ki.fsf@lassieur.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:17:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#32540: Cuirass: we need a way to manually trigger evaluations To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000099169f05746809a5" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32540 Cc: 32540@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --00000000000099169f05746809a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2= 018. aug. 27., H, 11:54): > The 'core-updates' and 'staging' branches shouldn't trigger evaluations > at each commit, because they produce too many derivations. Instead, the > admins should have a 'trigger evaluation' button that they use once in a > while. That button should be part of an 'admin interface', which should > be protected by NGINX's 'auth_basic' authentication mechanism. > > > I agree that we need a mechanism like this. I am not sure about what the protection mechanism should be. 'auth_basic' has some appeal, as it is quite easy, but I would like to hear some more opinions about that part. --00000000000099169f05746809a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The 'core-updates' and 'staging'= branches shouldn't trigger evaluations
at each commit, because they produce too many derivations.=C2=A0 Instead, t= he
admins should have a 'trigger evaluation' button that they use once= in a
while.=C2=A0 That button should be part of an 'admin interface', wh= ich should
be protected by NGINX's 'auth_basic' authentication mechanism.<= br>

I agree that we need a mechanism like this. I am not = sure about what the protection
mechanism should be. 'auth_bas= ic' has some appeal, as it is quite easy, but I would
like to= hear some more opinions about that part.
=C2=A0
--00000000000099169f05746809a5-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 27 08:09:12 2018 Received: (at 32540) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Aug 2018 12:09:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33650 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuGKW-0000qk-Bd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:09:12 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:53054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fuGKU-0000qb-0C for 32540@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 08:09:10 -0400 Received: from rodion (LFbn-1-3186-166.w90-79.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.79.195.166]) by mail.lassieur.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 2b94df95 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:07:20 +0000 (UTC) References: <87h8jgb0ki.fsf@lassieur.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Subject: Re: bug#32540: Cuirass: we need a way to manually trigger evaluations In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:09:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftz0au58.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32540 Cc: 32540@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont:= 2018. aug. 27., > H, 11:54): > >> The 'core-updates' and 'staging' branches shouldn't trigger evaluations >> at each commit, because they produce too many derivations. Instead, the >> admins should have a 'trigger evaluation' button that they use once in a >> while. That button should be part of an 'admin interface', which should >> be protected by NGINX's 'auth_basic' authentication mechanism. >> >> > I agree that we need a mechanism like this. I am not sure about what the > protection > mechanism should be. 'auth_basic' has some appeal, as it is quite easy, b= ut > I would > like to hear some more opinions about that part. It's obviously not ideal, and we can implement something more sophisticated later. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 25 09:15:48 2021 Received: (at 32540-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2021 13:15:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37491 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPq0-0006x9-N0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPpz-0006wv-6h for 32540-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPpu-0008Qu-2X; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:42 -0400 Received: from [2a01:cb18:832e:5f00:6893:84b0:dbe3:3cb1] (port=44586 helo=mathieu-HP-EliteBook-840-G1) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lPPpg-00036Q-EB; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:15:29 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: bug#32540: Cuirass: we need a way to manually trigger evaluations References: <87h8jgb0ki.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:15:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h8jgb0ki.fsf@lassieur.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:50:21 +0200") Message-ID: <87v99f4bo3.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32540-done Cc: 32540-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Hello, > The 'core-updates' and 'staging' branches shouldn't trigger evaluations > at each commit, because they produce too many derivations. Instead, the > admins should have a 'trigger evaluation' button that they use once in a > while. That button should be part of an 'admin interface', which should > be protected by NGINX's 'auth_basic' authentication mechanism. The admins can now change configure the specifications to build only a core subset of packages, or all the available packages from the web interface. Closing this one, Thanks, Mathieu From unknown Tue Sep 09 17:57:26 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator