Subject: Re: bug#32436: 26.1.50; Duplicate bibtex/BibTeX custom groups

From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:43:18 +0300

tags 32436 patch
quit

>From 74fd192fb752188e41560034faea7601fcde6c6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:05:25 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fix duplicate custom group names in bibtex.el

* lisp/textmodes/bibtex.el (bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist): Change
:group from BibTeX to bibtex.  Bump :version. (bug#32436)
---
 lisp/textmodes/bibtex.el | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/bibtex.el b/lisp/textmodes/bibtex.el
index efab9d8e3b..f0125e7b41 100644
--- a/lisp/textmodes/bibtex.el
+++ b/lisp/textmodes/bibtex.el
@@ -457,8 +457,8 @@ bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist
 which is called to determine the initial content of the field.
 ALTERNATIVE if non-nil is an integer that numbers sets of
 alternatives, starting from zero."
-  :group 'BibTeX
-  :version "26.1"                       ; add Conference
+  :group 'bibtex
+  :version "26.2"
   :type 'bibtex-entry-alist)
 (put 'bibtex-BibTeX-entry-alist 'risky-local-variable t)
 
-- 
2.18.0

I attach a patch which the presumed typo and then bumps the user
option's :version.  Is a change of custom group significant enough to
justify this, or should the :version be left alone?

Thanks,

-- 
Basil