GNU bug report logs - #32406
Simplify explanation of interactive form

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32406: closed (Simplify explanation of interactive form)
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 00:56:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 02 Nov 2019 01:55:32 +0100
with message-id <87ftj7t7uj.fsf <at> marxist.se>
and subject line Re: bug#32406: Simplify explanation of interactive form
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32406,
regarding Simplify explanation of interactive form
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
32406: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32406
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Javier Olaechea <pirata <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Simplify explanation of interactive form
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 22:46:55 -0500

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

The previous wording said that an interactive form is a declaration
periphrastically ("Its presence serves as flag"). I've done my best to
follow the ChangeLog format

Cheers,
  Javier Olaechea

-- 
"I object to doing things that computers can do." — Olin Shivers

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-Reword-description-of-INTERACTIVE-form.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Javier Olaechea <pirata <at> gmail.com>, 32406-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#32406: Simplify explanation of interactive form
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 01:55:32 +0100

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Javier Olaechea <pirata <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 22:46:55 -0500
>> 
>> The previous wording said that an interactive form is a declaration periphrastically ("Its presence serves as
>> flag"). I've done my best to follow the ChangeLog format
>
> As far as I could see, you just replaced "serves as a flag" with "is a
> declaration".  Is that true?  If so, can you explain why the proposed
> text is simpler?

More information was requested, but none was given within a year, so
I'm closing this bug.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.