GNU bug report logs - #32398
No trackers on Savannah

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32398: closed (No trackers on Savannah)
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:05:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 18 Jan 2020 08:04:39 -0800
with message-id <CA+8g5KE-r5mcrSWCdph9dZuHNKxJX3M+1edWT5rF7UwevBDtfQ <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#32398: closed (Re: bug#32398: No trackers on Savannah)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32398,
regarding No trackers on Savannah
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
32398: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32398
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Philippe Cloutier <chealer <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-diffutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: No trackers on Savannah
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:13:13 -0400

Severity: important

The Development section of https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/ contains:
For development sources, bug and patch trackers, and other
information, please see the Diffutils project page at
savannah.gnu.org.

The implication that Savannah has diffutils trackers is wrong.
diffutils has a debbugs issue tracker:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/db/pa/ldiffutils.html

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Philippe Cloutier <chealer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 32398-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 GNU bug tracker automated control server <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug-diffutils] bug#32398: closed (Re: bug#32398: No trackers on
 Savannah)
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 08:04:39 -0800

On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 5:30 AM Philippe Cloutier <chealer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> tags 32398 - moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Le 2020-01-16 à 21:25, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> > tags 32398 + moreinfo
> > done
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:49 PM Philippe Cloutier <chealer <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Jim,
> > ...
> >> Do you think the diff-tracker.diff which you posted in message #10
> >> solves bug #32398?
> > Yes.
>
>
> I am sorry but while that patch does reduce this issue's impact, it does
> not *solve* the actual bug at all.
>
>
> > Since you insist, I presume you feel it is not.
> > That is why I am requesting clarification.
> >
> > If you won't clarify what it is that you request, then please just
> > close this ticket, or I will.
>
>
> Thanks anyway, but as long as progress is reported, I will take care of
> updating this ticket's status if the need arises.

We seem to have reached an impasse.
I request more information, and still you provide nothing new.
Until you explain clearly what you feel is the bug, there is nothing
else to discuss here, so I have closed it yet again.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.