GNU bug report logs - #32332
[PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add hashcat.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 10:15:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 32332 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 32332 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#32332] Acknowledgement ([PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add hashcat.)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:59:59 -0400
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:22:05PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> I've packaged hashcat, hashcat-utils and hcxtools.
> 
> I don't have access to OpenCL-compatible hardware at the moment, so I
> can't really test hashcat.  Anyone?
> 
> Also I'm not so sure about hashcat-utils and hcxtools: the code quality
> seems rather low at first glance.
> 
> hashcat-utils seems to be necessary, e.g. to convert pcap files to the
> hccapx format used by hashcat.
> 
> aircrack-ng can used in stead of hcxtools.  See
> https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=cracking_wpawpa2.
> 
> While the hashcat community recommends hcxtools, I am under the
> impression that aircrack-ng is a much more polished tool suite.
> 
> What do you think?

I think it's up to your judgement. We package software with a wide
variety of quality. Unless there are known exploitable bugs in these
packages, I think we should go ahead and add the packages.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 287 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.