From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 29 11:42:08 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2018 15:42:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34002 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpf-0008IQ-TX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:42:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpe-0008Hz-Bp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:42:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpY-0001AQ-61 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:42:01 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpY-0001A0-2e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:42:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpW-0005m9-Ja for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:41:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpT-00014P-E0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:41:58 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe69:8da9]:49534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fjnpT-00012v-74 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:41:55 -0400 Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id AFD42165A9; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:41:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (cpc102582-walt20-2-0-cust14.13-2.cable.virginm.net [86.27.34.15]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E9301654B for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:41:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 2a7b146b for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 15:41:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Baines To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Patch duplicity with --ignore-mdc-error. Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 16:41:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Modify the package to patch gnu.py with an unreleased upstream change to fix duplicity working with recent releases of GnuPG. This change make the package build again. * gnu/packages/backup.scm (duplicity)[arguments]: Patch gnu.py within the patch-source phase. --- gnu/packages/backup.scm | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/backup.scm b/gnu/packages/backup.scm index 9884f58fc..0733d9c34 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/backup.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/backup.scm @@ -105,6 +105,15 @@ (substitute* "duplicity/gpginterface.py" (("self.call = 'gpg'") (string-append "self.call = '" (assoc-ref inputs "gnupg") "/bin/gpg'"))) + + ;; This matches up with an unreleased upstream fix, it should be + ;; removed when the package is updated + ;; https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.8-series/revision/1308 + (substitute* "duplicity/gpg.py" + (("--no-secmem-warning'\\)") + "--no-secmem-warning') + gnupg.options.extra_args.append('--ignore-mdc-error')")) + (substitute* '("testing/functional/__init__.py" "testing/overrides/bin/lftp") (("/bin/sh") (which "sh"))) -- 2.18.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 04 03:49:50 2018 Received: (at 32303-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2018 07:49:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40412 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flrJt-0006hL-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 03:49:49 -0400 Received: from li622-129.members.linode.com ([212.71.249.129]:37290 helo=mira.cbaines.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flrJr-0006hD-JS for 32303-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 03:49:48 -0400 Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id 8BDF31666E; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:49:46 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost (cpc102582-walt20-2-0-cust14.13-2.cable.virginm.net [86.27.34.15]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51CD21664F for <32303-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:49:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7be0555c for <32303-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 07:49:43 +0000 (UTC) References: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Christopher Baines To: 32303-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#32303] [PATCH] gnu: Patch duplicity with --ignore-mdc-error. In-reply-to: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 08:49:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87va8qfu5k.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32303-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Baines writes: > Modify the package to patch gnu.py with an unreleased upstream change to fix > duplicity working with recent releases of GnuPG. This change make the package > build again. > > * gnu/packages/backup.scm (duplicity)[arguments]: Patch gnu.py within the > patch-source phase. > --- > gnu/packages/backup.scm | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) Pushed now :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAltlWpdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XeFOg//Ql5VP+ZXvJo4JL5jSikLamCRoo4GcypmcK+gXKj+5fG1nLH573z+Dh8t QFev5y+fKlpwwVvtaDnkphMMniwANvS+e+HLdPm4tr9dSrlJIkbluF1ZIiBUgo6k cZbZqoJ7hEv1wPrL81Lm6A/dVYiglR+Mi30sfx4CkqxatGa84wyRoEw49oCYu8fH 9ZscTJ3lD0fTwZ8GxQOx683Qk/WH6gEdmuwzWoqtWEc1ulQdZgqpUn/GE37xM5cL 4nmHscVhly5KGMDkHwx5e+eNdmoL8SuKLLCYtrJsjd1gAZy0b4goQpLvI/Sk/TYM s8K67iaXmsZBIDFpKfWSMROslmr88Lke0wTsq4ixvfwr609C3jR/3UVAG+HdYveY Dm8ArqJDRdn9Fsk1ieRXeHZyXEo0hnbIh+Lsb/Lul5cDWvtY+LyUaN7NJeiNeJ9y oMhbGb1iRtmNFE6ch4y1RbYZMZaXNp5i+a5rC7gtjNF3Brz3I5fGyU3XIRDG7k4q aCaCLhCJmv74dR4zjxbYJ+0U3NdxW3qlupbgbZHII0b7HdqFL6wpwCmnYyheT1NL obAZxGQLvGdp/ZVvYpb+K5Yom095np2Hvli1FHzSVPKOIi955qchL8Sb7iEkkNBG D+y3QUSc5MejAjDLVXAe7R1qwEDfRciKPwQw0u22H+EyyH+028I= =JfkS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 07 12:56:59 2018 Received: (at 32303) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2018 16:56:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5I3-0001o7-7D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 12:56:59 -0400 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:52153) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fn5I0-0001nx-F3 for 32303@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 12:56:57 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CC0203; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:56:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Aug 2018 12:56:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=HXZeLv9omXwUSNSmkweUzPO8NCF2fCTtF3Pl3F/iUX8=; b=tbSl8 26zTpJB32mK/TKCcvB/0/zE+dXt6lJnRBAK465VU+yNDA5QWP3DG/aGRVO72NirC 0QyAYF/14teAu8qlgBOWf9/pFWBNOu5U4cphIsRDIerkqTFqPYWZCEvPUfqXAVVh +K3gH6MnVOgSDBDnvtmg93r+QJTY0rzUXrNQ28= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HXZeLv9omXwUSNSmkweUzPO8NCF2f CTtF3Pl3F/iUX8=; b=vUknlJhCJ/b3Pj2b7Inh1eoVeUNXlxlU0FYUyQ+oWYAWH q9kuzh8ZYtAwEDivqd+C0wxzVxnAYJ8yPlLriYD2/y+520SiSUfT4EoBi+22fD4D MNywtAo/ieowMi5IA/CGa1gJa3KifrZQGaNslk0CgnJzBh13R92bAJ7xXoEZd2Pm 9j8Q/ER22XgE9Dd2qSWCTAE9GAM9ap1L8Rl3xl7LnznSdY4uIKnW045vWwUMNLCF J1ALec7/g0Q4gKh+zmRS5zeIENBpsJUVUwLSrs/FzlaSgFrq62rysG4VxTR70/mM uMvHaMzUhcVcT0IMjlCUuZMATsX0EFNybGLzzk+XA== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (50-207-9-201-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.207.9.201]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ECA061025D; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:56:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:56:49 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [bug#32303] [PATCH] gnu: Patch duplicity with --ignore-mdc-error. Message-ID: <20180807165649.GA917@jasmine.lan> References: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32303 Cc: 32303@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 04:41:52PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > Modify the package to patch gnu.py with an unreleased upstream change to = fix > duplicity working with recent releases of GnuPG. This change make the pac= kage > build again. >=20 > + gnupg.options.extra_args.append('--ignore-mdc-error')")) Thanks for taking care of this package. I'm concerned about the impact of this change, and Duplicity in general. By ignoring the result of the MDC (modification detection code) check, I *think* Duplicity loses the ability to authenticate its archives. If so, the Duplicity package description should be changed to reflect this. I would at least remove the text about safety against modification. Also and FYI, Duplicity uses the MD4 message digest truncated to 64 bits (via librsync) to identify chunks for deduplication. [0] MD4 collisions are trivial to generate. It's not totally reasonable to remove packages like backup programs since, in the future, people will want to read the archives they have created. But perhaps we should steer users away from Duplicity in the package description. [0] See: =2E.. also briefly discussed in our bug tracker: --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAltpz04ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwijERAAufXPJJ5QZyYc9/ZKrux9pqAJOIbSc9UhT/59Hkragw637LpmzAP4lUMX +LvinlJLSHCqVZfo8MIP2VA6uDwtdZSPIHVYUf7WIKx5DsA/KWrFFnD8CT9otxP3 PWPtxN750BIx6lsJSt27115vcDDDFzIV/9RNrF3D2FNBdFxTfPqPAfIo/6J7uA7Y IIBb2CNzVJFsY8sYmMD85h5aTYnt7IGmMqS7Ysm2TDqheM0ykMrbJxDYpQKJMWvp IQ/m5aPDGm6ttA3VtzUFPf1Su5f/zKH7e5Av3FGDS8RepcP54KTr4bm70ogN6+cD MHGWlgjYuJFGKfb/gFKfqgnvQ42B5s/Whz0SaVJiqnxIdQBWEFUGB2+Xd/Nf13Pa d1P0oZytMyvvTvcbef1N6Ut7DhRY6hVDEW7+9W/qmeotpbn8ifu1RCNz2QwelIc4 ebK8ZNuCYc+n9+x57E82qhvsTW5KrzrQ7OdyFXt+wg2q8p9ScIf9iqD/5cfMWv5B rdTFgXr7krbWTiGkQOuLzbIadU31GojR6zxigs5kaYJCTRJA9fkwOUlxS9Ptnf2E B3MrVV1HPzkiD+j8yfEUzhPwmBQVQbCh5w5wFVVNfzrMWS4fedSgBphFroF6tEo9 15A+J1NxKQ3h/in9faebeUFQfqQ3k79voPoQuHOkT0QE1gJVeFk= =yMwP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 19 15:46:53 2018 Received: (at 32303) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2018 19:46:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1frTf2-000116-Qv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:53 -0400 Received: from li622-129.members.linode.com ([212.71.249.129]:48846 helo=mira.cbaines.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1frTf0-00010x-Pd for 32303@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:46:51 -0400 Received: by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix, from userid 113) id E6C81163BC; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 20:46:49 +0100 (BST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mira.cbaines.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from localhost (unknown [176.12.107.132]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39E0316292; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 20:46:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from phact (imp-kvaser-1404 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 23f3373c; Sun, 19 Aug 2018 19:46:46 +0000 (UTC) References: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20180807165649.GA917@jasmine.lan> User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 From: Christopher Baines To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [bug#32303] [PATCH] gnu: Patch duplicity with --ignore-mdc-error. In-reply-to: <20180807165649.GA917@jasmine.lan> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 20:46:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87ftzakul8.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32303 Cc: 32303@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 04:41:52PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: >> Modify the package to patch gnu.py with an unreleased upstream change to fix >> duplicity working with recent releases of GnuPG. This change make the package >> build again. >> >> + gnupg.options.extra_args.append('--ignore-mdc-error')")) > > Thanks for taking care of this package. > > I'm concerned about the impact of this change, and Duplicity in general. > > By ignoring the result of the MDC (modification detection code) check, I > *think* Duplicity loses the ability to authenticate its archives. If so, > the Duplicity package description should be changed to reflect this. I > would at least remove the text about safety against modification. > > Also and FYI, Duplicity uses the MD4 message digest truncated to 64 bits > (via librsync) to identify chunks for deduplication. [0] MD4 collisions > are trivial to generate. Hmm, this does look like more of an issue that I anticipated. I was thinking that this was maybe to do with the tests alone, but checking the upstream change again, it looks like it effects general operation. > It's not totally reasonable to remove packages like backup programs > since, in the future, people will want to read the archives they have > created. But perhaps we should steer users away from Duplicity in the > package description. Yeah, removing the statement about "modification" in the description sounds like a good step. I don't know enough to add something more informative to the description though. One extra thing to note is that I use duplicity (well, not much) through Deja Dup, so if there is issues with duplicity to describe in the package description, it might be good to add something similar to the few packages that use duplicity. Thanks for looking in to this Leo :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKSBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlt5ySNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XfiVA/4qPfrEMPEr8FP8KugBQfXU5viDgNzt1GB8/cXFD37zuwhABR7bjmUf6aQ tBftMJnPxuLgm0+4d3JC6bAm5wVrleFvYMUR7RCSc3Wjn7Y07MC6OsnXeDs1REKw cygsnt59zm8oGkDI+7BMbfSNNqzqTzOAGTbdXmfGcGp1VUrPKz0ls2Pw7xlLhgdW WQTYWCm2BtbOFhoQ8CQTJXU4XmwOysQU6xK2kZsX+ECZ6UFlE7JW8Lh3WilTsFAd 3qxYYDvD0ilOO3pctAV7qCV0ghgrfDb6nVUKsh3vifwcF01VcQhGZ87yueDD5v2s z/zZ6TAk7SigdZkoGTCuMAiCp9Lh89KMMQaPUHe2+6YjkkRfSR93X6TIrkY0yROP O9w9yeliV0fhtbyvEBI63TMc6i0+vG2ZC32ed90WkuVfZq4Bg+uXEWE1wYe9q3b5 J1R5OPhsn/m0TBs1y2YWISEM8DriXXMaW6L21sE+rPhiJvWGPw7ZQk7E3RTZZVx7 6BF2RzE96LRkHmOTQk8IbrAEstdVmvWnhTNCUrHxgagmnljomiibu6NXw23c9qhr PCgdRgudcXoCWaPv8B29842h6zhntE1jkFRgcjmzyXdRzGTohYtNcyt7wi45bh3G r4MRqzZvzl4al3aVYtOv4xQ14HSMqEjoDYAGRQ8K2CungiFR6A== =38/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 22 17:05:28 2018 Received: (at 32303) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2018 21:05:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58067 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fsaJj-0004z4-RB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:05:27 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:60473) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fsaJi-0004yx-LZ for 32303@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:05:27 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529F321FC2; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:05:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=Y9ZOPlP2SIdUdA6a3wk30bu5HJ9K7GiaqNZHBFW3jFA=; b=CNzSt qqjwzjH9eb3ROfY/Mb+eV5scSu+I9FSvKWh786lw5+2iDX+4DaeTIyNHNLQZowE9 6UhisLA3C64c72BH9v+R1hHpUXGuB0oVSCIX57YY5r8vGX6D/wIDOmeFV+0d1OF5 deWye3Y9Aj/6gHHIQpO8fTkc2NtVaPW6Mc7nSg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Y9ZOPlP2SIdUdA6a3wk30bu5HJ9K7 GiaqNZHBFW3jFA=; b=NxAhZlmSaKKacWW9UG/WcHozVCu0zhvP8P4CPdZqTIV7u OmFeMYOJTm3gnZoXfkN7nB/L5mkknrT/TA2OCEtVhCaNyLrouk225v9VGGKglp8l uXvssWOzpUfLBUQMs3LqfpNOgckjOjz8ZYflArXRmyqqRxo9pYF0uQesyHGDIlYD b2MUoBdX98JikKVx32Mg583/J2TvAj4xBFiXKgw5PtmdZlNECj6iBexMqwdRgr5m yHygxmxIZmWNZJAAygMvqdF3xmNm9hgtNgYivfGXlP+IYah70WYGvSCotQghGa9s WTeQ2kqVisqnFVjHOUVqDA770lIvqNDiGey+23esw== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-202-137.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.202.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E5FD8E47C7; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:05:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:05:23 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [bug#32303] [PATCH] gnu: Patch duplicity with --ignore-mdc-error. Message-ID: <20180822210523.GA5079@jasmine.lan> References: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20180807165649.GA917@jasmine.lan> <87ftzakul8.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ftzakul8.fsf@cbaines.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32303 Cc: 32303@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 08:46:43PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > Thanks for looking in to this Leo :) A few days ago, I sent an email to requesting clarification on how this affects Duplicity. I think my message is still waiting for moderation but hopefully it goes through. --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlt90BAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi03A//dL8NoAKcVQnXkzpmUjJDzJEgMhwjMNW8G4lhLwX11vX6tCrAepdlnbYb rVdDtfoThTnXtu9AsG1NxLumwdQMrfeSXxWQQJSHRpLMjWgOodwTKQbwINEt7Dka 0tz6PM/nGXmCC25pRKXgx8qTnuyh4Fq9+Pdwiks8nc7prPwHYABkyCPOe4Gl4K5n Q9TD/BrohOS9Bp1mMMZ/IvPfrPZLd/uMytp38NwIK1riHCXDgBVB0tdna1TloS3S 4dtzw1Ao7+5liUQWTZgRpqqsfhcBnqFx0b+E2VZUjO5h2Dua9zl2YbCJEypZbxmK eFV7pwzJOYTUe/erut02A6rt1YkD1/940UhAwA+3Q9lKE3qyi8FLD3P1fUq+S3Qo FXUULHitwEHc1VWamKnJ932HKvk7I4ys9rHU4ardIm9O/gddl9DhHELxWqdBrZEE w5+H3Mqi7l5ZpjWyJKLFsrUi/uHG4u3G/tYm8JnUuPuxxcZooInd5lDrFxLnmbwH clvp1dOWolwcfCYo/n2hiakd/8luYzFT7tdO0NMKmBao7lPoJ/1sCvuV08+PLo2/ DFrUmsy86oUmh+tvNuO6/I8+VauQQRzgPsvCgiryq78UxNHqey/aJCXDTDDoJRI7 HD4+dLa869b630Q2pwToywHKRhS2U4ohFgIxUaJcSLu3uLnskNw= =gXE9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 06 13:26:26 2018 Received: (at 32303) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2018 17:26:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fxy30-0003En-Ms for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:26:26 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53173) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fxy2y-0003Ef-AU for 32303@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:26:24 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C4021EF8; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:26:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:26:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=a99ty9s0PZgStIo4O2S0sV0H8haprr5Isu31V9jAREQ=; b=w1wpB eFbxZ75GNcxEI0PsedsZxVAFxoB5VRJgE4bz2MSjeJsTot3Yn7Lo+LbToj19zGbJ IYUhcVm8ZY8hWL/pX+PVnIUu6KzNsTCOFIOeXBhsyaGvTedNaoF6exY79LfvnLbf ZVejAjnS+v6sTs7h5uYI8CVp3rXjdA/i214xGA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=a99ty9s0PZgStIo4O2S0sV0H8hapr r5Isu31V9jAREQ=; b=XudaRJLjob23IC5eMk0MDQmtnZGh0WRSh0aVCEIHHeNg9 mO4UHBUCmQH/4R/fu+MxqB+nsr0nzRvNGr9Vu2dpasfoAMKXLLWHC9j1eK/ITcDa miEWRYyoK6eVNIbsVytV+4U4fhrIMsbr34uKYde3pSUHlnOFquVzPTk7gy/Leqrk ZqbWDs5kG5/E2TnlI/WKjY8Jtm1FKISh8OK10tZloJ+YUFa1pa7dvjpxWPRN7lgy 3eGGT2Y+ry/GhCuTX8y3VEU9AkcdX3GkU8eLlc8H4j3tFT0AKJUE8Gne0iy6ymva b4GWc0dWCP24/gTOe5RlK/sdowxmFnX19eztmfQCw== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (unknown [172.58.200.1]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 856D010297; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:26:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:26:20 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [bug#32303] [PATCH] gnu: Patch duplicity with --ignore-mdc-error. Message-ID: <20180906172620.GA2362@jasmine.lan> References: <20180729154152.11296-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20180807165649.GA917@jasmine.lan> <87ftzakul8.fsf@cbaines.net> <20180822210523.GA5079@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180822210523.GA5079@jasmine.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32303 Cc: 32303@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 05:05:23PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > A few days ago, I sent an email to > requesting clarification on how this affects Duplicity. I think my > message is still waiting for moderation but hopefully it goes through. The Duplicity project clarified the effect of this change on the integrity of the backup archives: "Duplicity does a hash of the entire file so the MDC is duplication of effort. [...] You are still protected by the hash stored in the manifest." [0] Based on that, I think the disabling of GnuPG's integrity check is not that important in this case. [0] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/duplicity-talk/2018-09/msg00005.html --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAluRYzwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg9ZQ/+K0rz+npaKZlVLJnzywlBWVAxSWkJ6wI9WG+XJCj0A1h+rVMzCT0AbWSw 2tLzXYIUogbGf/Gffpb/N7WbewVfOS4/LETb1u01zSoVbWXFSUUsFPpdAAqs/qfI Far5VEmRfVq79Yht+cIGQGEnAQBYZu2gtkGyWIK4KfWd7WiM1YJh/Vvajhorph8m Jwfic3QY3GNpmL3OxFDjJHStawBFRXSStTk3/iLSQTB6Rsox6ewY6vI48rXr3Lfg /v2h83K7oa8015u7jpLuef+K7Co6Xx2kcrW7skK2eOPaRLcdxl1FO7v1Vkw4LJyz wcYkJZLZZc+/Ej7fxlr3f4/qHVN4POQ+R/w63lXhhi6Bh3CkYDSV8ZzlbNXbut61 AWZbzLvaZsYW12/f4kEoiJFW4725pB+lfy8adzMut10ySwTKBty9UnFRCPypl45A QJQAhtyKejae94WhsyOu95RLnACH9Sej5FTamGNx510xCccaz48Ca11tPTNEs3J5 oyqnhC4QBq2PoHhOd4gPwNDdxUggzi4nuZPhNIAnuURVghRKMIzIS7nes1L77azB JBP64a0kgzMpAM/QW4Sfw1hV0dHotTZz0tQ6TR2QHZhf4DPFQTwRlN7EPOfpxAgb cly+W0FW/UG6A/oCulNexezqA09+C1mNWVoZcRD9U8yyQxHdBfY= =aoGF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:06:12 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator