GNU bug report logs -
#32280
26.1; FLYSPELL-BUFFER sometimes misbehaves for some input in a large enough buffer
Previous Next
Full log
Message #41 received at 32280 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:00:40AM +0300, Artem Boldarev wrote:
> Hello Agustin,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion!
>
> Unfortunately, it does not work on my system with 'emacs -Q'. So, somehow I
> need to manually configure my dictionaries anyway. I will consider replacing
> 'ispell-dictionary-alist'with 'ispell-local-dictionary-alist' in my
> configuration. Thank you for pointing out.
Hi,
I am using your example file with emacs -Q (Emacs 25) and had no problems,
flyspell-buffer works as expected after setting ispell-program-name to
hunspell and set ru_RU as dict (hunspell 1.6.2 here).
Local Ispell dictionary set to ru_RU
Starting new Ispell process hunspell with ru_RU dictionary...
Checking region...
Spell Checking...100% [laborum]
Spell Checking completed.
The auto-detected values for hunspell ru_RU are
(ru_RU [[:alpha:]] [^[:alpha:]] t (-d ru_RU) nil utf-8)
Wonder why otherchars is not shown.
> The codepage I specified in the configuration, as it seems, is not the
> problem as spell checking works fine *most* of the time. I could spellcheck
> large amounts of text without any issues. It seems that hunspell always uses
> utf-8 internally, but I am not sure: I will try to investigate this.
Seems I was wrong, it is a long time since I digged there.
¿What happens if you use "[[:alpha:]]" and "[^[:alpha:]]" instead if the
explicit character strings "[АБВГДЕЁЖЗИЙКЛМНОПРСТУФХЦЧШЩЬЫЪЭЮЯабвгдеёжзийклмнопрстуфхцчшщьыъэюя]"
and "[^АБВГДЕЁЖЗИЙКЛМНОПРСТУФХЦЧШЩЬЫЪЭЮЯабвгдеёжзийклмнопрстуфхцчшщьыъэюя]"?
Regards,
--
Agustin
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 293 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.