GNU bug report logs -
#32261
guix packages website: add mechanism to link to individual packages
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 32261 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:32:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Paul Wise <pabs3 <at> bonedaddy.net>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi all,
It used to be possible to link to individual Guix packages like this:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/m.html#myrepos
Since the recent change to the packages website the packages pages are
paginated and have no anchors, which means they will break as more
packages are added and also I cannot link directly to a package,
only to a location that contains lots of other packages too.
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/M/page/3/
Fixing this would be useful for the Repology support of GNU Guix,
which currently cannot link to GNU Guix packages:
https://repology.org/repository/gnuguix
https://repology.org/metapackage/myrepos/versions
--
bye,
pabs
https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:52:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 32261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Paul Wise transcribed 1.8K bytes:
> Hi all,
>
> It used to be possible to link to individual Guix packages like this:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/m.html#myrepos
>
> Since the recent change to the packages website the packages pages are
> paginated and have no anchors, which means they will break as more
> packages are added and also I cannot link directly to a package,
> only to a location that contains lots of other packages too.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/M/page/3/
>
> Fixing this would be useful for the Repology support of GNU Guix,
> which currently cannot link to GNU Guix packages:
>
> https://repology.org/repository/gnuguix
> https://repology.org/metapackage/myrepos/versions
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
It is not just repology, but easy linking to details for external
parties/downstreams we need to point to somewhere.
I think there were some remaining ideas for the new websites,
where a package gets detail page on its own.
The pages are statically generated, the old "useful" page format
was taking a very long time to load, with each release and increase
of package count we got k more seconds. Nothing I'd like to go back
to.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:42:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 32261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 16:52 +0000, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> It is not just repology, but easy linking to details for external
> parties/downstreams we need to point to somewhere.
Indeed.
> I think there were some remaining ideas for the new websites,
> where a package gets detail page on its own.
That sounds good to me and is how a number of distros do it.
> The pages are statically generated
In that case, perhaps when a package is updated in the VCS, the static
generation tool could be triggered to update just that package.
> the old "useful" page format was taking a very long time to load,
> with each release and increase of package count we got k more
> seconds. Nothing I'd like to go back to.
Agreed, going back to the previous version would not be useful.
--
bye,
pabs
https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 32261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Paul,
As Nils comments, the proposal in issue #25227 includes having a page
per package in paths like: /packages/blender-X.Y.Z/. (Check
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25227 for the details.)
If you think this issue is covered by that proposal, you could close
this bug by sending an email to 32261-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org. You can use
the same subject of this bug and summarize in the body why you are
closing it.
:)
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:51:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 32261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello Paul,
As Nils comments, the proposal in issue #25227 includes having a page
per package in paths like: /packages/blender-X.Y.Z/. It is already
possible to see a page per package at guix.info, but not at gnu.org
(check https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25227 for the details.)
If you think this issue is covered by that proposal, you could close
this bug by sending an email to 32261-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org. You can use
the same subject of this bug and summarize in the body why you are
closing it.
:)
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:36:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 32261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi sirgazil,
You wrote:
> If you think this issue is covered by that proposal, you could
> close
> this bug by sending an email to 32261-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org. You
> can
> use the same subject of this bug and summarize in the body why
> you are
> closing it.
I'm no Paul, but I don't think the above addresses this bug. A
package link that includes the version and breaks on the next
upgrade is of limited use; in fact I can't think of any.
I'm leaving this bug open, but have closed the other one you
mentioned in #guix. Thanks!
Kind regards,
T G-R
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#32261
; Package
guix
.
(Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 32261 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
It is now possible to link to packages like this:
https://packages.guix.gnu.org/packages/guile/
Which I think solves this issue, right?
---
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
https://luis-felipe.gitlab.io/
[publickey - luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com - 0x12DE1598.asc (application/pgp-keys, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 204 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.