GNU bug report logs -
#32248
(emacs) `Indentation Commands': Bad formatting
Previous Next
Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:38:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in version 27.0
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:26:31 +0300
with message-id <83bmavv1bc.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#32248: 27.0; (elisp) `Indentation Commands': Bad formatting
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #32248,
regarding (emacs) `Indentation Commands': Bad formatting
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
32248: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32248
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Some of the key descriptions do not use the correct font: <TAB>, <LEFT>,
and <RIGHT>.
You can see this more easily in the HTML version:
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Indentation-Commands.html
In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 3, x86_64-w64-mingw32)
of 2018-03-21
Repository revision: e70d0c9e66d7a8609450b2889869d16aeb0363b5
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
`configure --without-dbus --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32
--without-compress-install -C 'CFLAGS=-O2 -static -g3''
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:13:50 -0400
> Cc: 32248 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> The corresponding texinfo source has:
>
> adjusting the indentation of the affected lines interactively. While
> this transient mode is active, typing @key{LEFT} or @key{RIGHT}
> indents leftward and rightward, respectively, by one space. You can
> also type @kbd{S-@key{LEFT}} or @kbd{S-@key{RIGHT}} to indent leftward
>
> It seems that @key{} by itself just puts angle brackets around the key,
> without changing font. @kbd{} translates into <kbd> tags. So I think
> the formatting is as intended.
Yes, it's what the author intended. Whether to use @kbd{@key{...}} or
just @key{...} is many times a judgment call, and this case is
borderline. However, given that some of the keys in this node are
inside @kbd and some not, and they are so close to each other within
the same text, I think it is better to have them all in @kbd. So I
made that change, and I'm marking this bug done.
Thanks.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 363 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.