GNU bug report logs -
#3224
23.0.92; vc-dir vs uniquify: wrong directory used
Previous Next
Reported by: Magnus Henoch <mange <at> freemail.hu>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:25:06 UTC
Severity: normal
Merged with 4553,
6672
Found in version 23.1
Done: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
> --- lisp/uniquify.el 2010-01-04 05:35:18 +0000
> +++ lisp/uniquify.el 2010-01-06 03:22:51 +0000
> @@ -232,9 +232,9 @@
> ;; of code like in set-visited-file-name:
> ;; (or (string= new-name (buffer-name)) (rename-buffer new-name t))
> ;; So we need to refresh the dirname of the uniquify-item.
> - (setf (uniquify-item-dirname (car items))
> - (uniquify-buffer-file-name
> - (uniquify-item-buffer (car items))))
> + (let ((bfn (uniquify-buffer-file-name (uniquify-item-buffer (car
> items)))))
> + (when bfn
> + (setf (uniquify-item-dirname (car items)) bfn)))
That doesn't sound right.
Why is bfn nil in your case, and why should we not update
uniquify-item-dirname correspondingly?
> @@ -265,9 +265,11 @@
> list-buffers-directory))))
> (when filename
> (directory-file-name
> - (file-name-directory
> - (expand-file-name
> - (directory-file-name filename))))))))
> + (if (file-directory-p filename)
> + (file-name-as-directory filename)
> + (file-name-directory
> + (expand-file-name
> + (directory-file-name filename)))))))))
I don't thing that's right. Instead, you probably want to set
list-buffers-directory to something like (expand-file-name "*vc-dir*"),
as is done in PCL-CVS.
Stefan
This bug report was last modified 15 years ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.