From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:48:56 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#32220 <32220@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#32220 <32220@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords Reply-To: bug#32220 <32220@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 10:48:56 +0000 retitle 32220 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords reassign 32220 emacs submitter 32220 Tino Calancha severity 32220 wishlist thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 20 04:05:00 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2018 08:05:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQPL-0004Se-V1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:05:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQPK-0004SS-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:04:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQPD-0003sk-RA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:04:53 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQPD-0003sY-NC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:04:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQPC-0001aF-BZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:04:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQP9-0003ry-4J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:04:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pl0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::244]:33247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgQP8-0003rl-Th for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 04:04:47 -0400 Received: by mail-pl0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 6-v6so4859803plb.0 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:04:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=2buoQ+NtNlJQ0Qq/KoLwCoX8xGeo8QAqRFzHw6ilXDQ=; b=PEfhB9WUiJtpDzeb2Xu9VpgWpIvaTwsV2MsNvpYb4S3WY3tBUiMIBe07ZHnPKnHE2l sw4tLQeM+p8vfvff6YIVkuRKLTDGTMNSt10c0azB4vsv04woo+cWf5l7CQ+mG7SdaZHp dsDT+Z5w/RXv1YVwOxMXPlVt/WvGOdXQ34VrkwuOsTfny+TJSArGQVNeS7YXUXCY0Uv/ TQPcHMAoiCkFh96GzdQpwAUx4JMZ4Ht5QrAy+Iy1Gw/N8mcZsdVO4cjrDuUVlPSctE3f b3gMXYoQM9YZ/z8WQ8oaY5nogFeguC8EHGXbIqRu2KZ3yw9U5M6fdGW+x064TPvLIhss OeuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=2buoQ+NtNlJQ0Qq/KoLwCoX8xGeo8QAqRFzHw6ilXDQ=; b=XAPWw7EUfdXrqNZfzl7a8SwNfTF/aQl73QF/wwQ9uVoE8DbkeuEmXlB6NsVbDeUHIh fyRXEDK+a/01+kmerDNAk1CBERqc9OBe5ePI1WVUNwjyA4bOLwhjYvernNZkBLXWSf2g LVt1VQVGApCMt3tJYTuh+kuqjYkDfTtyng5QfeFiTMtqsaC5CzG4LqMRJwIOf17S/7fj s/wpiCwWv8asRl8dvAyt3WoPNoK/l3MXWwl+hJ3gto9qy8yFU4PtJ9AXyZJ5/ieaq+p0 QbttilH9OVj9t+blczfPHfflLSYsI6qANxUvbredUhJam1HExUoaaYMHp3mlNiILhWPB +7kw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFyzyWC9NDJbNlxf8ZUZfdA6hgH25c5NNjZciRtT6nSmJdlbbfF w5rsIyK2XLN8r9A0cQr67lhjxxgx X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdxJSoyDjPGilu3F7seDzv7Bl1t67XsfmjfOaOkeJcxvTC8SQzwetm0BqWaG4TkFu3mF2BJXg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7894:: with SMTP id q20-v6mr1117592pll.3.1532073885027; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp (195.139.137.133.dy.bbexcite.jp. [133.137.139.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9-v6sm1322560pgv.31.2018.07.20.01.04.43 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Jul 2018 01:04:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:04:39 +0900 Message-ID: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Cc: Stefan Monnier ,Noam Postavsky ,Eli Zaretskii ,tino.calancha@gmail.com It might be argued that a hidden string is more legible when using ?* as the hidden character instead of ?. For example, the following strings have the same length: "......" "******" Following patch uses ?* as default character to hide passwords instead of ?. --8<-----------------------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 6b5c3db59650590d9db24ef110b972019b24e03a Author: Tino Calancha Date: Fri Jul 20 16:58:33 2018 +0900 Prefer ?* to hide passwords It might be argued that a hidden string is more legible when using ?* as the hidden character instead of ?. For example, the following strings have the same length: "......" "******" It's slighly easier to visually count the number of characters in the second string (Bug#32220). * lisp/subr.el (read-passwd): Prefer ?* as default char instead of ?. * doc/lispref/minibuf.texi (Reading a Password): Update manual. ; * etc/NEWS (Changes in Emacs 27.1): Announce the change. diff --git a/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi b/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi index 889b64af8a..d091787a68 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/minibuf.texi @@ -2199,7 +2199,7 @@ Reading a Password @defun read-passwd prompt &optional confirm default This function reads a password, prompting with @var{prompt}. It does not echo the password as the user types it; instead, it echoes -@samp{.} for each character in the password. If you want to apply +@samp{*} for each character in the password. If you want to apply another character to hide the password, let-bind the variable @code{read-hide-char} with that character. diff --git a/etc/NEWS b/etc/NEWS index 8275cbb72c..f21da91a4b 100644 --- a/etc/NEWS +++ b/etc/NEWS @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ work right without some adjustment: * Changes in Emacs 27.1 ++++ +** The function 'read-passwd' uses '*' as default character to hide passwords. + --- ** New variable 'xft-ignore-color-fonts'. Default t means don't try to load color fonts when using Xft, as they diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el index 10343e69db..59a6209af3 100644 --- a/lisp/subr.el +++ b/lisp/subr.el @@ -2305,7 +2305,7 @@ read-passwd If optional CONFIRM is non-nil, read the password twice to make sure. Optional DEFAULT is a default password to use instead of empty input. -This function echoes `.' for each character that the user types. +This function echoes `*' for each character that the user types. You could let-bind `read-hide-char' to another hiding character, though. Once the caller uses the password, it can erase the password @@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ read-passwd beg))) (dotimes (i (- end beg)) (put-text-property (+ i beg) (+ 1 i beg) - 'display (string (or read-hide-char ?.)))))) + 'display (string (or read-hide-char ?*)))))) minibuf) (minibuffer-with-setup-hook (lambda () @@ -2346,7 +2346,7 @@ read-passwd (add-hook 'after-change-functions hide-chars-fun nil 'local)) (unwind-protect (let ((enable-recursive-minibuffers t) - (read-hide-char (or read-hide-char ?.))) + (read-hide-char (or read-hide-char ?*))) (read-string prompt nil t default)) ; t = "no history" (when (buffer-live-p minibuf) (with-current-buffer minibuf --8<-----------------------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 18, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.11) of 2018-07-20 Repository revision: fb24ce37d1bc258cfc3884d9828aa0602fa06e1d Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11902000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 20 08:06:46 2018 Received: (at 32220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2018 12:06:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48908 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUBJ-0008AE-QX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:06:45 -0400 Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:48424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgUBI-0008A4-1S for 32220@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:06:44 -0400 Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w6KC6g99011822; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:06:43 -0400 Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 25CAB64F3E; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:06:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Monnier To: Tino Calancha Subject: Re: bug#32220: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords Message-ID: References: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 08:06:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> (Tino Calancha's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:04:39 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6333=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6333> : inlines <6766> : streams <1793090> : uri <2676450> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32220 Cc: eli zaretskii , noam postavsky , 32220@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > It might be argued that a hidden string is more legible when using > ?* as the hidden character instead of ?. > For example, the following strings have the same length: > "......" > > "******" > > Following patch uses ?* as default character to hide passwords instead > of ?. No objection on my side, Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 26 22:31:22 2018 Received: (at 32220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2018 02:31:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fisXK-0002SO-Lm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:31:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:41503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fisXJ-0002SC-GU for 32220@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:31:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id z8-v6so2304047pgu.8 for <32220@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:31:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=M/GErQkbXUtkWCP3lAGqXWBeG8lhUOHaSlVwSDd0Fk0=; b=CsL4g8iY8C5lCB0PnmOS23AuQmM8d2ZhFJ4vrWuIp7xkzxlaA4r9yVWwBI9Q6sDA6C uL7Ghw6js2HRh8HEEB0K0yVPDfzLpBdp/syx/Idir9p0m2OMFFagbFT3PJh9GlEwLrQK kAY0MBOtdXdZWqEytT5PYw1miduhvLOUlohCzzXWvN4gdj8caXTePNIcNf5lyJMkG6In CKlnwcmBZJ1AQ9wS4U0xHuYRWf6ohr5VjUI2YS+F8xvVJak2axfDDpAg5AyHhmof1pT7 UJjCQTfm9UtQmYe36aNzGULWzEo0Kzf+xkYuHehEHdxau9/cEyzlh/Sw9WXvrs/kwbuq scmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=M/GErQkbXUtkWCP3lAGqXWBeG8lhUOHaSlVwSDd0Fk0=; b=KOT/0y+9O5+8Y+fnFKrlhM4sp5v8nulbFg++EoHHPnoPl0h+9XQvcXfS48ncRYzdWC cdMdV3wZMc6McQwawhvn1Roe76w+Dc7+3sESFikgbDK02nx+tyCFPhbjwmzW3UNv72Ry Q1hQQtvqidqfwReTpY7iaKSDvRtCPd50IhmN9S+xo4Q7IKX1VCiu75CFS3bJ/bKC6PMs mhS2M/HQ6C1t46rpwv0PkiOmvQVda2dVxazSC5DgWc9IJ95+z+j+LMdEWhD0V1a9o0e2 BW2WuqPEKgQXF+9Bc+fkTmLRuQ6AXyzuXEzvF3oec6iA4pJumTK7dqzpUS32OIOXjV5L TgKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGhWSFJtKjo3c3xti6+t7DtIMT81acgyowG93+a/A80dKlmCqei IxfCFUfxmpldj/aAkGNLRueKJE7L X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfbpyarCTmHrUuddNGqd6G/294Sch1ajg0wib/NJXDn4s5OdjyTNNsEjV8wh8QFMEDNt3jhSw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:941a:: with SMTP id m26-v6mr4141267pge.82.1532658675203; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp ([210.164.9.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d132-v6sm3654433pgc.93.2018.07.26.19.31.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha To: eli zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#32220: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords References: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:08 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> (Tino Calancha's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:04:39 +0900") Message-ID: <877elh76kz.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32220 Cc: 32220@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Tino Calancha writes: > commit 6b5c3db59650590d9db24ef110b972019b24e03a > Author: Tino Calancha > Date: Fri Jul 20 16:58:33 2018 +0900 > > Prefer ?* to hide passwords > > It might be argued that a hidden string is more legible when using > ?* as the hidden character instead of ?. > For example, the following strings have the same length: > "......" > > "******" > > It's slighly easier to visually count the number of characters in the second > string (Bug#32220). > > * lisp/subr.el (read-passwd): Prefer ?* as default char instead of ?. > * doc/lispref/minibuf.texi (Reading a Password): Update manual. > ; * etc/NEWS (Changes in Emacs 27.1): Announce the change. Eli, which branch is suitable for this patch? Next release or master? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 27 08:34:45 2018 Received: (at 32220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2018 12:34:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fj1xF-0004Au-F7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:34:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43619) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fj1xD-0004Ah-OG for 32220@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:34:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fj1x3-0007DI-KV for 32220@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:34:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fj1x3-0007DB-G3; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:34:33 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3179 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fj1x2-0003CO-Ao; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:34:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:34:32 +0300 Message-Id: <83d0v8svqf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tino Calancha In-reply-to: <877elh76kz.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> (message from Tino Calancha on Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:08 +0900) Subject: Re: bug#32220: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords References: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <877elh76kz.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32220 Cc: 32220@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Tino Calancha > Cc: 32220@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:08 +0900 > > Eli, which branch is suitable for this patch? Next release or master? Master, I think. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 29 08:25:54 2018 Received: (at 32220-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2018 12:25:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33268 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fjkll-0003Qs-UY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:25:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]:42912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fjklk-0003Qg-9V for 32220-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 08:25:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id l9-v6so3327316pff.9 for <32220-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 05:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=zrMednp0xj7xstVHQsZ7m3qpH2K6/QJ5IOlacw1htBM=; b=tRUn+x71dC5F4itIZq6eTZa6cb/Y9g693tqFTdGB8PHS+raZjOeojWpzg3qqw4tGJM TMoXOXks8jif5/tVMzWqPF2Mj8YhAgPqRebvB5W7huL7877TLbrPL63a4B5g5DWN4CmX Y1+z1WZHHdGavh6h18ctUZNZLrMSRA8ermjmYQaoOrFJfbHMxPSRDJ7lkqLrbT6dpco6 S+YHdEdXJKTvoEa06zB57VvzNgPKAw6iIq9H8dfULQS5k696oCu4FPSrKARigk5O2iMd CB2d8laOL9NVDjWB3OA4DRFmm7maf0AXpcDrdcj0FpYcqIxIGMoqkd/6ykYYVCFw0sgm 7rcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=zrMednp0xj7xstVHQsZ7m3qpH2K6/QJ5IOlacw1htBM=; b=m7nd05RENeJvQwr29IKu2l2l205AjPvwFLsxXBANK4RCFB1Pkyg7O1/oE35+0+6taq jRHUmICTYSGUfboEyQZDT3AjrKKjcJeis7kBi90Bn/V8DY62h15tnaJ3TFrHObce54Qh ZRynDOnpvCyTsqf9tWy8AKj3t+QT7j9UnACFaoWjQ1B0tQ6K4xInP/SKnAJJ4kdR9s18 9MCMs5VBy7/iy5OLDrcDpvWMlqM+u1QDvt/KG1QfNbWu/GDQ6X4ZYvP/LpLpRzXfr+mn q9Mh4+9Hz61hFuC/XvAJ+HKoAa5kZPd7CD0hbuNgZTUG+ilQw+RMHPQsuJidaXvuci0/ F6Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH2LvmPYze7v+JZEmkdEfBysuUtBLoljUtYlpZfMZZiNOQUZ4s/ IVEwHQDj0yVwPiYs1zTdIfls7oIA X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd5QPadMn2GJfhsItsv8VeOjnAhXILtkvh0XbPdXr3wf3m5RJuGjD1dwpABBcOugVvRQRKT2g== X-Received: by 2002:a62:d94a:: with SMTP id s71-v6mr13756744pfg.164.1532867146156; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 05:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp ([171.251.222.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q81-v6sm19609779pfd.15.2018.07.29.05.25.44 for <32220-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Jul 2018 05:25:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha To: 32220-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#32220: 27.0.50; Prefer ?* to hide passwords References: <87bmb29vu0.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <877elh76kz.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> <83d0v8svqf.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 21:25:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: <83d0v8svqf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:34:32 +0300") Message-ID: <87in4y1b5s.fsf@calancha-pc.dy.bbexcite.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 32220-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Tino Calancha >> Cc: 32220@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:08 +0900 >> >> Eli, which branch is suitable for this patch? Next release or master? > > Master, I think. Thank you. Pushed into the master branch as commit 'Prefer ?* to hide passwords' (b3f7e73fb76a366dc644ee2e6b9f4897c17d201d) From unknown Sat Jun 14 03:48:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator