GNU bug report logs - #32095
[PATCH 0/2] Update libuv and node

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>

Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 15:18:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl <at> gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 32095 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#32095] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: node: Update to 10.6.0.
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 18:36:18 +0200
Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com> writes:

> We already have the latest libuv on 'core-updates'.

Indeed, I forgot to prune old branches and get confused.

>  I wanted to push
> this patch to master actually (with a libuv-1.23 package), but node does
> not work with OpenSSL 1.1.1:
> <https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18770>.

I have read rapidly this thread.

IIRC the build for node 10.xx was failing with ‘openssl’ which was the
reason of upgrading to ‘openssl-next’ and this issue seems to imply that
node fails to run with ‘openssl-next’?  Is that correct?

Have you recently tried to compile ‘node’ with libuv-1.23 without
upgrading the “openssl” input?  How did it work?

> So I wonder if we should downgrade to the 8.12 LTS release, which still
> supports OpenSSL 1.0, until the OpenSSL situation is sorted.  From what
> I can tell it might take a while.
>
> What do you think?

I think that ideally it would be a good idea to have both the latest and
the LTS versions distributed in Guix.  So I agree with your solution of
downgrading to 8.12 LTS.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin
GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 297 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.