GNU bug report logs - #31934
[PATCH] Fix ALSA_PLUGIN_DIR usage

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org>, Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Cc: rekado <at> elephly.net, 31934 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#31934] [PATCH] services: sound: Properly handle alsa-plugins.
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 13:49:52 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes:

> Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
>
>> Le 2018-06-25 17:34, iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org a écrit :
>>> Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> iyzsong <at> member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> writes:
>>>>
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>>> Hello, after some hours of searching...  I found that we can use the
>>>>> 'lib' option in 'pcm_type' and 'ctl_type' to specify the library path
>>>>> for alsa plugins, e.g:
>>>>
>>>> Thats a nice hack :-)  Thank you for working on this.
>>>>
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>>> So I think we can make our 'alsa-service' do this, instead of
>>>>> patching
>>>>> alsa-lib for 'ALSA_PLUGIN_DIR'.
>>>>
>>>> Done.  Here is a patch which I tested on my machine by ‘system
>>>> reconfigure’:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you, I modified it to keep the 'pulseaudio? #f' function, and
>>> pushed :-)
>>
>> So maybe we can drop our ALSA_PLUGIN_DIR patch now?
>
> Yes, I think so.  @Ricardo, should we do it in core-updates?

If you're quick, you can do it on 'staging' which I'll attempt to
re-start during today.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.