Subject: bug#31927: 26.1; Fragment/bookmark part of URL omitted in default offered by `eww'

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 17:38:54 +0300

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked] (N. Jackson),  [email-masked]
> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:10:42 +0200
> 
> >>   3. M-: (thing-at-point-url-at-point) RET
> >>   => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midsummer#History
> >> 
> >>   4. M-: (url-get-url-at-point) RET
> >>   => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midsummer
> >> 
> >> Is it expected for these two functions to behave differently here?
> >
> > Yes, that's the question.  I hope Lars (CC'ed) could comment on that.
> 
> I think the behaviour of `url-get-url-at-point' is suboptimal here.
> Perhaps we should just make eww use `thing-at-point-url-at-point'
> instead?  And mark `url-get-url-at-point' as obsolete, as it doesn't
> seem very actively maintained and duplicates thingatpt functionality.

Probably.  Unless some functionality really needs to ignore the parts
after the hash, for some reason.