From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:18:57 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#31907 <31907@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#31907 <31907@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfiguring Reply-To: bug#31907 <31907@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:18:57 +0000 retitle 31907 New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfigur= ing=20 reassign 31907 guix submitter 31907 swedebugia severity 31907 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 19 23:19:19 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2018 03:19:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeR-0006aL-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeP-0006a8-Hw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeJ-0006ba-BY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:12 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeJ-0006bO-6C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeI-0003Rr-8N for Bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeF-0006YU-4n for Bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:44953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVTeE-0006Xx-RH for Bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:19:07 -0400 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7D621A0A4E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:19:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1529464745; bh=zuMoWn/KU8gMGXip1t9R2CINPM5eY5ydsDoZmgf8Rxg=; h=Date:Subject:To:From:From; b=b74TARzblL6rbvx2DPYd68VyqFBYsUbSFCwT68frxKdARL90HyGoY2g2BFqad3p03 IjZWJbcUyjHa4p5d+SZdvCeWfhl8F+qsY2YvyCu00rhv0vhS581Qdo7Ru4BDpfPYve 5QuYIFXDkx5Fgvtc7wIoNqUCRTcvY4hPBzBZncC8= X-Riseup-User-ID: 60FA1F64E5BCB2852E5BAC78B9BDF9345C2809E5872ED340CAD18D146C63F574 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 9BFFF40C59 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:18:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----TIPB7AUQFT3ZXNIPI4HAVCJKC173YD" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfiguring To: Bug-guix@gnu.org From: swedebugia Message-ID: <022CFE10-F1D7-4C39-BBFE-473F82165F47@riseup.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.1 (-----) ------TIPB7AUQFT3ZXNIPI4HAVCJKC173YD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steps to reproduce: Install 0=2E14 Init system with user a Login root Guix pull Make sure it has right paths to =2Econfig/guix/current Reconfigure with new user b Reboot Login user b When logging in slim? populates the dot-files and a =2Eguix-profile is cr= eated with path to old guix=2E No =2Econfig/guix/current exist=2E=20 --=20 Cheers Swedebugia ------TIPB7AUQFT3ZXNIPI4HAVCJKC173YD Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi

Steps to reproduce:
Install 0=2E14
Init system with user a
Login root
Guix pull
Make sure it has right paths to =2Econfig/guix/current
Reconfigure with new user b
Reboot
Login user b

When logging in slim? populates the dot-files and a =2Eguix-profile is cr= eated with path to old guix=2E No =2Econfig/guix/current exist=2E
--
Cheers Swedebugia ------TIPB7AUQFT3ZXNIPI4HAVCJKC173YD-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 20 17:35:44 2018 Received: (at 31907) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2018 21:35:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVklU-0004hB-88 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:35:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60239) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVklT-0004gz-HE for 31907@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:35:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVklN-0000UE-Jb for 31907@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:35:38 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fVklN-0000UA-GO; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:35:37 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=41884 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fVklN-0005fN-3e; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:35:37 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: swedebugia Subject: Re: bug#31907: New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfiguring References: <022CFE10-F1D7-4C39-BBFE-473F82165F47@riseup.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 2 Messidor an 226 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:35:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <022CFE10-F1D7-4C39-BBFE-473F82165F47@riseup.net> (swedebugia's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:18:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87sh5hp2e0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31907 Cc: 31907@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) Hello swedebugia, swedebugia skribis: > Steps to reproduce: > Install 0.14 > Init system with user a > Login root > Guix pull > Make sure it has right paths to .config/guix/current > Reconfigure with new user b > Reboot > Login user b > > When logging in slim? populates the dot-files and a .guix-profile is cre= ated with path to old guix. No .config/guix/current exist.=20 ~/.config/guix/current is created by the new =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99. = So when coming from 0.14, you actually need to run it twice: the first run will give you the new =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99, and the second run will actua= lly run the new code and create ~/.config/guix/current. Could it be the reason you didn=E2=80=99t see ~/.config/guix/current? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 26 07:06:04 2018 Received: (at 31907) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2018 11:06:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35675 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fXlnQ-0001eX-IA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:06:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:59871) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fXlnO-0001eP-Hw for 31907@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:06:03 -0400 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5DFD1A04B1; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:06:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1530011161; bh=HVJ734WzUc+aBLzgV1izCjqLGlRINDKMKg9dy9LJxDE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R0N1SC3xXvHpEeOyNWtiBahA0ftDFrhvnkZFBkE3YBLgfPp1rTELYeofppsMiAV3R IZfL93+leML+2JqkPLUOvPZZo5kMZ1ADhhoEiVy3rLOVd/kQvY2CXzTaQZ05O4iiDo fSmQsqVQyF3tZ8aiumpnROIbr04J7FizOwlHpGQ8= X-Riseup-User-ID: 4723C178FED68C564AFC7EAD5E3063E57D47E528E0ABE6A6026F05F521C119EE Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 86C4A41B81; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:06:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:06:01 -0700 From: swedebugia@riseup.net To: ludo@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#31907: New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfiguring In-Reply-To: <87sh5hp2e0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <022CFE10-F1D7-4C39-BBFE-473F82165F47@riseup.net> <87sh5hp2e0.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <68c050778b26c874e04e2b34703cc363@riseup.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31907 Cc: 31907@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On 2018-06-20 23:35, ludo@gnu.org wrote: > Hello swedebugia, ..snip > ~/.config/guix/current is created by the new ‘guix pull’. So when > coming from 0.14, you actually need to run it twice: the first run will > give you the new ‘guix pull’, and the second run will actually run the > new code and create ~/.config/guix/current. I understand. This is not the problem. I wrote yesterday on #guix: hi guix I wonder if any of "pull" or "system reconfigure" update the guix in the system profile? My system profile in sdb1@antelope ~$ ls -l /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix lrwxrwxrwx 2 root root 75 1 jan 1970 /run/current-system/profile/bin/guix -> /gnu/store/avg3vnk6p752z8iwld6yzv1wg7ki48vp-guix-0.14.0-13.7af5c2a/bin/guix even though I have pulled and reconfigured multiple times: as root root@antelope /home/sdb1# guix pull -l Generation 1 jun 18 2018 19:26:00 guix b4eae99 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git commit: b4eae997fe5b928f179c34d281e9f2c3eccd3670 Generation 2 jun 22 2018 20:48:03 (current) guix 8edebd3 repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git commit: 8edebd3207335aff15081458e895104ac9f45d3d You could ask: why care about the guix version in the system profile at all? It is not used as soon as you run guix pull or populated the .config/guix some other way and adjusted the this to preceede in the PATH. I care because if I create a new user via config.scm they by default get access to an outdated guix when a newer is available. This is in my view a bug. Maybe its me who do not fully understand how system profiles is supposed to work. I tried looking into the source but it was not clear to me how it is supposed to work together. The manual does not mention when/how the system profile gets updated. I supposed it happens when a new profile derivation is built during reconfigure. Maybe this is not correct. Maybe guix is supposed to be in the system profile after all (I dont specify it in my config.scm ATM and none of the templates do either) Cheers sdb From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 26 11:10:44 2018 Received: (at 31907) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2018 15:10:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36372 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fXpcC-0001Id-17 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:10:44 -0400 Received: from imap.rdsor.ro ([193.231.238.8]:50712 helo=mail.rdsor.ro) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fXmPt-0004ZC-LR for 31907@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 07:45:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (unknown [82.77.55.168]) by mail.rdsor.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4409940561; Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:45:48 +0300 (EEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\)) Subject: Re: bug#31907: New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfiguring From: Dan Partelly In-Reply-To: <68c050778b26c874e04e2b34703cc363@riseup.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:45:47 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7D5D202B-781A-453A-B8A7-EA8DB38451C6@rdsor.ro> References: <022CFE10-F1D7-4C39-BBFE-473F82165F47@riseup.net> <87sh5hp2e0.fsf@gnu.org> <68c050778b26c874e04e2b34703cc363@riseup.net> To: swedebugia X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18) X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31907 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:10:42 -0400 Cc: 31907@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Well, I wondered myself , and I was palning to test when I arrive home = today. But here is my take: 1. Premise: The system configuration is declarative. The declarative = state should be obeyed all times by the system 2. Implication: running a guix pull (or any other form of update) as any = user should not do anything to the guix stored in the system profile 3. Implication: updates of binaries in the system profile should never = be triggered by anything else than a guix reconfigure 4. Implication creating a new user should result in him seeing the base = state of the system , as left by guix reconfigure . It should never see = any version installed by any other user , root included. Now the issues: - Although the system is declarative, once you run guix config / guys = reconfigure you do not know the whole state of the system. Arbitrary = package versions are installed, and reconfigure will arbitrary update = those packages - the only way I seen to have consistent state is to lock all system = packages to a known version, and reconfigure should obey the lock. -running guix reconfigure is an issue at the current time. It is = because unless you lock each package @version (and I did not tried t = see if this works , a developer should confirm, or point to some good = workarround) adding a user, changing system configuration in some othe = small way=20 seems to trigger a rebuild - there is no guarantee that GuixSD will offer you a substitution = instead of building the derivation. Which if you are unfortunate to = update a package for which is not prebuilt substitution you will end up = looking at compiles wearing out your time.=20 -it may cause rebuild of critical system daemons, then, guess what, stop = them and reload. You have to be very careful and run dry builds to see = if anyone touches your system services, cause you do not want unplanned = service outage on a server.=20 -it reports success even if it fails to bring the system in the required = state. For example for me reconfigure failed to restart 2 services it = stopped, but it happily reported all went ok=20 - guix is still broken for me: reconfiguring the system results in build = errors sometimes. Also results in service errors , like home service not = being able to be restarted.=20 - guix pull inflicts all the wrongs of the universe upon its users. No = critical system utility should ever update itself from the bleeding edge = of a source repository. No matter how genius the developer is, it will = always break in too many ways. This is very bad practice. - guix reconfigure without locked packages does the same offense. will = try to update to a version of itself derived directly from development.=20= Tools: =20 - guix still lacks the tools to make sense as a user of what is = happening. For example, a guix diff which gives insight what exactly = triggered a rebuild. I could not find such a thing.=20 - other tools to keep under control the rebuilding happiness. I have = better things to do on my system then looking at walls of compiling , = donno for others. I want to add a user , not trigger compiles :P > On Jun 26, 2018, at 14:06, swedebugia@riseup.net wrote: >=20 > ou could ask: why care about the guix version in the system > profile at all? It is not used as soon as you run guix pull or = populated > the .config/guix some other way and adjusted the this to preceede in = the > PATH. > I care because if I create a new user via config.scm they by > default get access to an outdated guix when a newer is available. This > is in my view a bug. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 25 00:46:43 2019 Received: (at 31907-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2019 05:46:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44434 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmuKB-00019C-02 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:46:43 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:56752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gmuK8-000192-4O for 31907-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:46:40 -0500 Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (cotinga-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A311A0197 for <31907-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:46:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1548395199; bh=Z/zzNVyXhdaWE2U+VYupKAaKQfkf0VCh7lC78DXPPeY=; h=Date:Subject:To:From:From; b=kvRn5/Q+H6VqLI2gbt4GKkFPCgIlim1yKURQ80PETlNzdjFgox79jqDCrV34wbqq0 uDSUk3Cz93nWqQWPwOu/mf/5a7aPJl2Y0pkERJ8N+NDMQGpyma2p8B5yQZXHnrtJLV B9qNagDGKFsxTEx/t6LEfpu9oxSZZtVwbmjbx2kg= X-Riseup-User-ID: 129F83625E40D6191345C9159C3E6C4428766057821F88634B105CE9A504A428 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cotinga.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 61FC840837 for <31907-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:46:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:46:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----0FKIHKISTVRJCNF4T9DK911M97GEBS" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: New users get wrong/old profile path to guix after reconfiguring To: 31907-done@debbugs.gnu.org From: swedebugia Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31907-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) ------0FKIHKISTVRJCNF4T9DK911M97GEBS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Closing=2E=20 --=20 Sent from my p=E2=89=A1p for Android=2E ------0FKIHKISTVRJCNF4T9DK911M97GEBS Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Closing=2E
--
Sent from my p=E2=89=A1p for Android=2E
------0FKIHKISTVRJCNF4T9DK911M97GEBS-- From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:18:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator