GNU bug report logs - #31888
27.0.50; Segmentation fault in replace-buffer-contents

Previous Next

Full log

Message #49 received at 31888 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: acm <at> muc.de, k.michal <at> zoho.com, monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA,
 31888 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31888: 27.0.50; Segmentation fault in replace-buffer-contents
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 22:09:36 +0300

> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA,  acm <at> muc.de,  31888 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  k.michal <at> zoho.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:04:58 +0100
> 
> >> Is that worth the hassle?  The caller asked to replace the entire
> >> buffer by something else, why should they expect after-change hooks to
> >> be run on something other than the entire buffer?
> >
> > s/entire buffer/entire accessible portion of buffer/g
> 
> FWIW I use this on potentially small sections of the buffer, by first
> narrowing down to it.

In that case, the after-change hook will be called on the narrowed
portion of the buffer.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.