GNU bug report logs -
#31800
suggestion of improvement for sort-numeric-fields function.
Previous Next
Reported by: SK Kim <tttuuu888 <at> gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:10:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se> writes:
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>
>>>> - (sort-skip-fields field)
>>>> + (unless (string-match-p "^\\s-*$" (thing-at-point 'line))
>>>> + (sort-skip-fields field))
>>
>> I don't think this patch makes sense as is -- I think that's a
>> convoluted way of saying `looking-at'? But it makes conceptual sense, I
>> think.
>
> I'm not sure. Do you mean to use:
>
> (looking-at "\\s*$")
>
> Are we sure point is at the beginning of line here though? The above
> code doesn't require that, but also seems to be wrong if region is in
> the middle of a line. But I'm not sure how people typically use this
> in that case.
I assumed that
(thing-at-point 'line)
returns the current line, but I haven't actually looked at the code, but
you're right -- we don't know where point is, so that has to be moved
before checking. In any case, using thing-at-point is not the right
thing.
> BTW, shouldn't we also fix the same bug in sort-fields while we're at
> it?
Yes.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 164 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.