GNU bug report logs - #31721
“generate-jar-indices” phase fails on many packages

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>

Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:17:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus <at> mdc-berlin.de>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>
Cc: 31721 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#31721: “generate-jar-indices” phase fails on many packages
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:20:37 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org> writes:

>> The errors are either about duplicates as in java-picard-2.10.3:
>> 
>>     duplicate entry: htsjdk/samtools/AbstractBAMFileIndex$1.class
>
> That's... bad.  What if those files differed?  Which one would be used at
> runtime?

I wonder where they come from.  Is this from a dependency or are there
actually two such classes?

>> or about missing files as in dropseq-tools:
>> 
>>     java.io.FileNotFoundException: /gnu/store/q76y0ximcziplgfpbn26kbw4h3s14f33-dropseq-tools-1.13/share/java/lib/biojava-alignment.jar
>
> That's also bad.  How does it run at all if its dependencies are missing?

To satisfy the dropseq-tools build system the dependencies a symlinked
to the build directory.  I suspect that the error is something to do
with that.

> The only thing I can think of that would improve things long term:
>
> The phase can add relative paths to all the dependencies to META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> before invoking "jar -i".
> Then "jar -i" will index those - and all java packages can use regular inputs
> instead of propagated inputs.  I've tested that locally already - and it
> works fine.

Is it correct that this would ensure that in case of duplicate class
names this would pick the class from the current package?

-- 
Ricardo




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 7 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.