GNU bug report logs - #31718
26.1; Strange behavior of `cond'

Previous Next

Full log

Message #41 received at 31718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: robert-emacs <at> cochranmail.com, jaygkamat <at> gmail.com, ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp,
 pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr, npostavs <at> gmail.com, vibhavp <at> gmail.com,
 contovob <at> tcd.ie, 31718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, schwab <at> suse.de, hector.e.r <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond'
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 18:20:43 +0300

> Cc: 31718 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>,
>  Vibhav Pant <vibhavp <at> gmail.com>, Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>,
>  Andreas Schwab <schwab <at> suse.de>, Jay Kamat <jaygkamat <at> gmail.com>,
>  Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Pierre Téchoueyres
>  <pierre.techoueyres <at> free.fr>, Héctor Enríquez Ramón
>  <hector.e.r <at> gmail.com>, "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob <at> tcd.ie>
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 08:10:02 -0700
> 
> Given the practical consequences of this bug I expect the bug fix
> should be backported into the emacs-26 branch too.

Could you explain why?  I'm not necessarily opposed, but AFAIU this
was Emacs's behavior since day one, so it isn't a recent regression.
Am I mistaken?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.