Subject: bug#31718: 26.1; Strange behavior of `cond'

From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 08:30:34 -0700

Noam Postavsky wrote:
>      Return a new uninterned symbol.

You're right, my mistake. Still, I prefer using (cons nil nil) since it's 
cheaper and is a common way to address this issue elsewhere.