From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:26:09 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#31702 <31702@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#31702 <31702@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.1; Effective font height is different from set value Reply-To: bug#31702 <31702@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:26:09 +0000 retitle 31702 26.1; Effective font height is different from set value reassign 31702 emacs submitter 31702 Carlos Piat severity 31702 normal tag 31702 notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 03 23:14:32 2018 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 03:14:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfx1-00083K-Sg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfwz-000832-UN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfwt-0004ys-Df for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:24 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:42664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfwt-0004yl-9i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfwr-0000z5-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfwo-0004xr-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:21 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]:40311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPfwo-0004xb-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:14:18 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q6-v6so5169231qtn.7 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 20:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=mPwaoenRHGvgXY0+6hkUDnz7BtGIt7OEl+TK1fwjA7c=; b=dcO3bK2K/GVcZ3zHDiEsrJ9mMjMjpEzM8An/stcpTvfwsQDdI7zTF8iv+oCmOPj4a6 GHpkyuazkZLkcW4v0EWYNNQNbYHHBtkU6l0c7r3qYdE/kGgJ6P3SDeHzP4SX6NnVfeIy Reg5PGYX6jKZ+BS7BVlyISgO6ZyKrD8iCOYIUdmp1XQ1bFQM3e4mciG7O0JwsJ1MIf5z pdwa6HhJIW4BfshzAGC8g8Wt5prSy1UeY/R0wN3LM9CS0JMFR3vyF4FqA8Jebsq1cN0/ O4L3nm/nMEWmVi9NBzDyX1zsBdJBXa9W3PexhXRm04Aa4/ahrAHdTsQXMeRXMZyQTK0I rZgQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=mPwaoenRHGvgXY0+6hkUDnz7BtGIt7OEl+TK1fwjA7c=; b=bpdMfIMARpe/ep/HZBzUcjgk1Hx8MBYk0quAIW25WyLqBIFoPPEwjCglJmeGe0Zv13 5XCabLvEG2UxY84QLv2f2KGcteYulvGALcmtSHM60X3VoGR6VQc5nncBHKngez3yeVoY z6HQiw8StND+V4YoqkIkxgXOOvtEUXjWT0uKZ64rMMmomUxyRCK+Vf12t5PtX36vZ0Fx iBCxVVDfhSStTsLrBRmyNRaSV1ApnoY/pbxNh2oGaNYMV82ugx6ImKSiMXPPZ4bjyleY k2JnEnfdJW3Mbfkhn4ErlPO5TmQUOUKBbjn6DpZ3Pw78aMl7TPEl9J/roCw2GngqZl9/ 2Exw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E07TqTdX5bKygYWyokUUJaKSKN8CVHqXDxSZ1ogfj4Z7MvMVTRT p1wPFZ3vYPwkpMnIsyIHKKUYOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKL9BneB4KEVKKOYSURp6IU937o6gPlFWuxhjf85yIfDnHpqLJL6tna0OeHPVOwYrP4r1y4Quw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:254d:: with SMTP id 13-v6mr2775678qtn.0.1528082057396; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 20:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlos ([190.244.190.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j1-v6sm5327166qte.13.2018.06.03.20.14.16 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 03 Jun 2018 20:14:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Piat To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 26.1; Effective font height is different from set value Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:13:12 -0300 Message-ID: <87tvqjp7lj.fsf@carlos.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I'm setting the Hack Mono font for the default face with size 110: (set-face-attribute 'default nil :font "Hack" :height 110) but I noticed that the result is slightly different from what gnome-terminal renders for "Hack 11". Namely, in emacs the font looks bigger. So I checked the attribute value in the customize-face screen for the default face, which showed a height of 113. Playing a bit with different heights I realized that the number I set is never exactly the setting that ends up being effective, as if a rounding error or something was happening somewhere. Even if I set the font as "Hack 10" or set it from the standard dialog that is available in the menu bar the result is the same. Some relevant libraries in my system are: local/freetype2 2.9.1-1 Font rasterization library local/libxft 2.3.2-1 FreeType-based font drawing library for X In GNU Emacs 26.1 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.30) of 2018-05-29 built on juergen Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11906000 System Description: Manjaro Linux Recent messages: nil Creating customization items... Creating customization items ...done Resetting customization items...done Creating customization setup...done nil Entering debugger... previous-line: Beginning of buffer nil Auto-saving... Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-xft --with-modules 'CFLAGS=-march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-plt' CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND GPM DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE M17N_FLT LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 MODULES THREADS LIBSYSTEMD LCMS2 Important settings: value of $LC_MONETARY: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LC_NUMERIC: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LC_TIME: en_US.UTF-8 value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Emacs-Lisp Minor modes in effect: show-paren-mode: t diff-auto-refine-mode: t pyvenv-mode: t shell-dirtrack-mode: t tooltip-mode: t global-eldoc-mode: t eldoc-mode: t electric-indent-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml mml-sec epa derived epg gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail-utils cl-print debug crm vc-git base16-default-dark-theme base16-theme paren cl-extra yasnippet elec-pair highlight-indentation flymake-proc flymake warnings company edmacro kmacro pcase help-fns radix-tree help-mode elpy find-file-in-project ivy delsel ivy-overlay ffap thingatpt windmove diff-mode easy-mmode elpy-shell pyvenv esh-var esh-io esh-cmd esh-opt esh-ext esh-proc esh-arg esh-groups eshell esh-module esh-mode esh-util elpy-profile elpy-django s elpy-refactor subr-x python tramp-sh tramp tramp-compat tramp-loaddefs trampver ucs-normalize shell pcomplete parse-time format-spec advice json map ido grep compile comint ansi-color files-x etags xref project ring cus-edit cus-start cus-load wid-edit finder-inf info package easymenu epg-config url-handlers url-parse auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core cl-macs eieio-loaddefs password-cache url-vars seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv cl-loaddefs cl-lib time-date mule-util tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core term/tty-colors frame cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray minibuffer cl-preloaded nadvice loaddefs button faces cus-face macroexp files text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote dbusbind inotify lcms2 dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 364347 15038) (symbols 48 32967 1) (miscs 40 772 758) (strings 32 72107 1797) (string-bytes 1 2082553) (vectors 16 52862) (vector-slots 8 929416 10894) (floats 8 121 290) (intervals 56 576 99) (buffers 992 15)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 03 23:48:45 2018 Received: (at 31702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 03:48:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60748 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPgU8-0000R2-Ug for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:48:45 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:47014) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPgU7-0000Qc-1N for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 23:48:43 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id d22-v6so21815580iof.13 for <31702@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 20:48:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Pv2zJwzaZOb6CF3gVELlXqDu6Je3GIb6rnkL44Fmx34=; b=joeGG8oSV2dGDFyjRXU9cOEwDcpUuCbvEjxtT638OA1oTz0xuiXoZHw3LAZYY8baIm wcIZDZ5BX/kL5puZ+d5fnr3ypMuV89Sm7w/aielhfrguNUIED3yErblHRl6GllTHq1L2 ENobAfRhF3vk2FFTuSFBh+8zJ1EKNpE9gHtfEGTC81sXIoiOytjIOMSg8ExjN/+Snlrk AEPbWF5ICW4zosp8+DMG0fsSb3CDkTFhMzx6L4Qa4HJXStX0GjbT/i4OQSpJAkxE2UGC fgASkcErSDgdyNcG/KXOwLmx2y6N+ZXH038cSW2w2cmrcnvhCIV/o7SpOnZx9yKyx1sq No1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Pv2zJwzaZOb6CF3gVELlXqDu6Je3GIb6rnkL44Fmx34=; b=b8GNJo5BXTJ+aF6xK20c+TzHEbEhbqar/qajT80cLconX5CrUEMZPfEC+VBXfHKRcF Y00aHXG/xzuUgwIcTsY5XCgUSwCEaVc8e1r714Hb7X+KFC0Hd/jaOjdotiuhb3pC7+Xn 1otlw/vrA7/3YN+nNI0UfIUAPWfw6cdjnbIDdLQ4ED6kIVwlkRXPoxyDqQChq+lTlcLa LndEbSZ2wjJ+wzeIwtckXPBMMJd89vkRtz6QiWZICW4FzM1IK2RUUZhyj90Y/vOW24on tVA337ivzjEilNpLIrqy/IxTg+KTOsPTCdKn7ckQ4aV3mbWKGe09793hoL4AfBD7fyZB ZXfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweS5KZNyS7X/XrDi+NJkXgrhwm1ekFeU7a/dac1j69KCNj/i6fk NtEuxmNLi5oRAbQ6tKdjl79lNcD1FtpkooBhwCo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKCiU9Zu7GSEtLgjP6I+A0nzEtaRZRkquSFx8SShzyD93yrUCXioz2nFklmYgxV+O1vbWmzod8sy+2dGiD4R1Y= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:882a:: with SMTP id k42-v6mr19623101iod.137.1528084116893; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 20:48:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:a98e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2018 20:48:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Pita Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 00:48:16 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: To: 31702@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ok, I think I now understand the problem a bit better: 1. Changing the height from 102 to 109 sets the effective height to 105. This size is the same of that of the font which both the font select dialog and gnome-terminal show for "Hack 11" (I have counted pixel by pixel in comparative xmag shots). [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.8 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.223.169 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.223.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31702 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) Ok, I think I now understand the problem a bit better: 1. Changing the height from 102 to 109 sets the effective height to 105. This size is the same of that of the font which both the font select dialog and gnome-terminal show for "Hack 11" (I have counted pixel by pixel in comparative xmag shots). 2. From 110 to 116 the effective size is 113 as stated above. This is the size corresponding to "Hack 12" in the font selector and in gnome-terminal. 3. 117 rounds up to 120, etc. So I guess it's just a different way of rounding up to the next available size (I don't know which is the precision of the underlying font renderer but I assume it's not a tenth of a point... from the numbers above it seems to be about 6 or 7 tenths of a point). But: * The fact that setting the font from the font dialog offered in the menu bar of emacs itself doesn't set a font with the height that was previewed in the dialog is a bit disturbing. * Besides, since the height attribute documentation explicitly states that the it is measured in tenths of a point, the rendering of a font with height P * 10 in emacs should exactly match the rendering of the same font with size P in the system. There is no "rounding up" excuse for the mismatch between 110 and 11, for example. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 04 13:27:41 2018 Received: (at 31702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 17:27:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33600 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPtGf-0003ph-3C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 13:27:41 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:42168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPtGd-0003pP-Dk for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 13:27:39 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id r24-v6so4384656ioh.9 for <31702@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iG8CFZcoJul71lSKIor4tT/8/x9BG1NpY9OooTGNkbg=; b=NBqRSFL2p3Q8qOBANoU4CeE+EtIvyJQTfGOF7afC8zu/37J49mgOeZDmTj2rRUMm0V 5FYr0R/E5WHBinjDcRhP95nftuBS72KY+jGKFZsEg5Md15dKZvqvBnZ5O0k53KeNl8/B UY56w6LyqxV6al8JRggdMGRk7y2hTH34q8Swuw2evIEhrtVGiE/Dm4+RKnrK96VC6ofI YBd77FmwY2LtzUPqcA9KxBKH5jkEoCGOwXNF1nhE4Of9+Yl/NUZRf6O+FjpQDEpPBB3B gCPvFuzTpa/njWpI+NtN6Izt1q0FTjqxKJSxbl6lWO05i5b4Jk6jNXL0myGRF+xYgKXp 3CeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iG8CFZcoJul71lSKIor4tT/8/x9BG1NpY9OooTGNkbg=; b=OeJvv4PHvOm2TXeAeUoT8mhI+XWiEPowHVaTztUfa78eAbZ47isGNZIFOcySHDF/Sb rSkvt405qP4Wb4vzbRtiL7cwEjEe70JP0Hn//wD8J+NbF5XLtDSCDBeltNvG4nhR8sX/ 6SZ1/Q62SZiMRWrAlhtndflD/KaHmIJgFWBH897fCj9f9vEh/oeBIA3avfeOmXlpl9Vx FJ8akNEI6XCyRS/HOFNy7hZPOX/57wxfALSYcyst9Zkea+6xwS0C2YkHX08WDje4UsQe Ry1/dK+WUOyRP0TtdkAdlsfuRPShfb8JxQOwsjZAr917wYOr+1izdVb7zj3Y4ADovRXG bHHg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2NXR2WBgiVPXhw7N1p8/oPb68mZi7DV656jNTe/WqLulD71Him 8JYTVfX7ppWQWTxFZj5pqg3zX2QYYQALQNM8RLw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKFEJrS2N2L5sgghATNXtRYE+nBC5rA21qTNgZ/B4kftMHBP2yXKFGQlj1wvjk4qM61HcKz32MvjpGDeTh/5j4= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:bfc1:: with SMTP id p184-v6mr22774353iof.80.1528133248629; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:a98e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:27:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Pita Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:27:07 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: To: 31702@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: A further inconsistency is that setting "Hack 11" from the resources file makes the face height 105, in a manner that matches the system behavior but not emacs own behavior when setting "Hack 11" from the font dialog or the init file (which makes the height 113, as described above). [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.223.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31702 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) A further inconsistency is that setting "Hack 11" from the resources file makes the face height 105, in a manner that matches the system behavior but not emacs own behavior when setting "Hack 11" from the font dialog or the init file (which makes the height 113, as described above). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 04 14:25:56 2018 Received: (at 31702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 18:25:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33624 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPuB2-0005CA-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 14:25:56 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:46698) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPuB0-0005Bx-Dd for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 14:25:54 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d22-v6so81708iof.13 for <31702@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 11:25:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JEQ/A8WZKMzKH8pBuhcsPkeUyEV8/G4CZ8kmshxi6xc=; b=jorN6qIy1ZN4UQRIzoiOMBsdNbzsUuxPTm1EFIm85LuhCdo0I2IG2sLsfKn+KkguXB cpkN7lQ+V/V8QLi+skFu8f/Dnubwf0ti0huNS7aQv7kjCsq9tB+aO/mHS+HsuituRxOJ WJ5ikXy3BKxEIbLVoXbGw/rWP1T2Awg4QVZbZoBKhih04lIYgVc/H6x8S5AQwYKGzVS0 FNLFxTsFU+tOuLADVkNAkCdXVJUiIgcrGMEgHarXHctsLY96Oy/laFOvvDxID7DZnSvO zQBhSWiF2Rrqu4WoVs/rohqRxgIXY9/h2+1s+1PVejUTUPCQ5QE0+MACqhK9Wif5Q9vG kQXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JEQ/A8WZKMzKH8pBuhcsPkeUyEV8/G4CZ8kmshxi6xc=; b=Csr9/7+fd54f6ZdZtOd7rg1f1t5rDjpWK3QtcWUM/CIowZ9PBmNA7dhbR57VL17BDh 5EUnkNLlutIDlG7hz4ovhtSuXdJZCoK331TM75V74IJ5QXZlsWTjWX1xigjTqIA5u4HP zcpgFYrWVjdLrIDlL8vN0tX7wgaDBfqQ5N7QOcz2XBDYuOGAEhTkEUsfi32uUCWA8+NT +2j1TGKxUm94deEdVq4iR8Jpv+UxLYySNFtGZOmiPu1wkAIstGv38gMMxR1JZ1KNjClt +974PJMZgUPFojAbwVcqZg/QgBttqkFQDwM+KwAB3nIraIuKszzrsVFwGmt8e/JOVDma i0Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2ipXt2nV5kCFMJddlP7Der56LA66mYS43Rll8uSCGoBIAOEPEw /+SHDhWrlXHf9CvDAz+ynJSpNJfmy5Cv/19TYbQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIXYK8cAq6cWDZT+uNd98wCZ/xOaSqfrYO2vdzd8cpGnKRBTilfE+ADv/KeBjH6ipFeTEqNo9ORPzYX7mD3JTA= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:bfc1:: with SMTP id p184-v6mr22981895iof.80.1528136748542; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 11:25:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:a98e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:25:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Carlos Pita Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:25:28 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: To: 31702@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31702 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sorry, forget about this last comment, my mistake, just got confused with the font descriptor, emacs is indeed consistent in its inconsistency with the desktop :) All in all I'm not sure how to feel about this issue. Despite the external inconsistency emacs is internally coherent and, according to what I described in my second comment, I would say it's selecting a more accurate effective height than the desktop. But, anyway, the inconsistency is annoying and it's not even possible to get the same font from the resources file since the size/height granularity is less than the one offered by emacs face specification. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 04 15:11:35 2018 Received: (at 31702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 19:11:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPutD-0006DN-16 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50729) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPutB-0006DB-Fd for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPut3-0005kk-6f for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:28 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPut3-0005kT-3Q; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:25 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2849 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fPut2-0003F5-Jr; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:11:33 +0300 Message-Id: <83o9gqbc4a.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Carlos Pita In-reply-to: (message from Carlos Pita on Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:25:28 -0300) Subject: Re: bug#31702: References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31702 Cc: 31702@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Carlos Pita > Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:25:28 -0300 > > All in all I'm not sure how to feel about this issue. Despite the > external inconsistency emacs is internally coherent and, according to > what I described in my second comment, I would say it's selecting a > more accurate effective height than the desktop. But, anyway, the > inconsistency is annoying and it's not even possible to get the same > font from the resources file since the size/height granularity is less > than the one offered by emacs face specification. Then maybe you can convince the developers of the desktop to follow Emacs's example ;-) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jun 04 19:03:04 2018 Received: (at 31702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 23:03:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33711 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPyVD-0003AV-TP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 19:03:04 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:43548) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPyVA-00039p-3k for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 19:03:00 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f194.google.com with SMTP id t6-v6so974529iob.10 for <31702@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 16:03:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gh4dHQsxdnxJtwqbk3ULkvcT+oXGruH1rUmtTWxtOuA=; b=AeFhvA3QASbwZg1GKDUxk2ZEmmywWUVMu2bPGeCjFQ2vYmRfkl3wP/nUVCEcSrD1/f eTP3BRPI7+EgPK+dhqy8n0mliiN/VrrRaBxMTafp7ma5g3hwFtinSZIbquPLryxWBPK4 QCEBEGx/irenpXrC9scKO5gSNIDHqP4HgjS/GAHLnvQV8chlvBiiGhA5bGTFFe9laEAm RSrai/g8L33F4nVBzkCE7K93e3g9ALpuGvT2HtqBx0r7prkekubv16y8wqAd7/IN+ioJ Kb9+uRkzzU/XcvcO2DAO7SZLKvTdEhePIpSkGNOUtur2IzEjkqXS8PsDtEBwcPwY+mkx lrfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gh4dHQsxdnxJtwqbk3ULkvcT+oXGruH1rUmtTWxtOuA=; b=ZQ1DKw0dT7wyCFNChF96FM8kwbqfnxCG9r2MniTEvk4Tw71DEoLy8HwdNjdX69IqI8 u4Ivx41x1XDIEhxV0Bm7MVDG5n/1AE/eaZm+/GgdGsGibfpfzacfrQXNo0hlddQ4ivfD r3+rIe4z0WajRTryKISRwrwKB7PlNj+Y9H8yctdJWpk21FVs2fijOW8d0dz+F1Wm/j3F VQjD0tUPeA5Tf7I4Qm1XipYwatQTZjYJkZ86Kbo/tw+eLvaXVcdoTUHpKK0h1ufN9bgI aBZHUm0D84A/eIdhFqqiAyrcgxnjlp8iHzfJvi0yfFj5YpY2+dmSyTF97Noa6vzrbzfp PFUA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E08r8ZZ8fCUoQWS2dKxSkUlo3cgIuxQeWLeYsLnHkr4efIz0gp+ C3jW7uYVtR7RLre7WcJ8kV97g13pzB1DuuDcoRE37g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIFTDfNPb7yx50Zuml7+XJda7WbmiUFXnERGx6Ts39n5QBcCRlhODZokazYGUD90ALPOO9FJmy8BgRKCPpWlGo= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:bfc1:: with SMTP id p184-v6mr23860503iof.80.1528153374551; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 16:02:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a02:a98e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:02:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Pita Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:02:33 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: To: 31702@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I noticed another weird behavior (but it's not emacs fault as explained below). Hack:size=11 looks very different of "Hack 11" or Hack-11. In fact "Hack 11" is more like Hack:size=15. The fontconfig documentation states that the size property is a double which specifies the size in points, but then it's ambiguous when stating how the size is encoded in a descriptor. The general descriptor format is: [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (carlosjosepita[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.8 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.223.194 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.223.194 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31702 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) I noticed another weird behavior (but it's not emacs fault as explained below). Hack:size=11 looks very different of "Hack 11" or Hack-11. In fact "Hack 11" is more like Hack:size=15. The fontconfig documentation states that the size property is a double which specifies the size in points, but then it's ambiguous when stating how the size is encoded in a descriptor. The general descriptor format is: -:=:=... where can be "size". So there seems to be two equivalent ways of specifying a size in points: Hack-11 and Hack:size=11. But by trial and error I found out that when part of the name-value list, the size property is synonymous with the pixelsize property. So the right way to specify a point size is, in my example, Hack-11. Now, I was concerned about missing some font sizes, since emacs is rounding sizes in a different way than gtk or whatever is the desktop using. But my concern was unfounded. To be sure, emacs' Hack-10 is desktop's Hack-10 and emacs' Hack-11 is desktop's Hack-12, so there is a gap there. Of course, this is no big deal when setting the font from inside emacs, since I'm able to set the size with tenth-of-point precision: instead of 110 I just set 109 to get desktop's Hack-11. But TIL that from resources file I'm able to set double valued sizes, so Hack-10.9 also does the trick. :) >From my very limited experiments, it seems to be that emacs is rounding sizes to the nearest available one while the desktop is always rounding them down. Perhaps is a bit impolite from the part of emacs to behave like that in a desktop environment but its behavior is both internally consistent and more accurate. I feel inclined to close this issue (and maybe to add an entry to the wiki explaining this font sizing border case). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 21 07:31:18 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2018 11:31:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58275 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVxo5-0003BZ-OF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:31:17 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:50544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVxo3-00033r-F2 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:31:15 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id u4-v6so4178985itg.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 04:31:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=BXpggbF5JH6MVyOE5lbfkZYfUpRv6GQhnBFbK6iQ6VE=; b=T509aJL7HL5V5npsbmbcuMOtDjeTaG1lg7xBckGI1sqgPq+5Ui0fBYm7xGDI8YG0p2 16z741F7ePbLfkucOUN9KTtKaJ62Jrq4LSdXp2x+Yy+Ypf1JgjuOR+wOKAims0BKDV7l EInieYFmdkLoSk5TOuaNFysdsrpqkBzVwM0lw98y7RWzBimHiQWSEDeCip7i2DV04kCo kUQEKqncPMV1yweOO0nwAkWvNsIY2uIDZQcsgF7r9M+HPDPYtKa/DQ/XCimuiAAtvQZ5 NUUK4HI4fWT4QOFRIUWMiR3WFQ2USAhJpdwyxYRZTBRQ5ns02rFa/Mxsvq2g4UffbCsM QuDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=BXpggbF5JH6MVyOE5lbfkZYfUpRv6GQhnBFbK6iQ6VE=; b=JPrCvcK0+OzJ1llicnUuce41W3rNsTi4mQE7cyfarJpYGjB9Fmg1LlaaXcNuYn5ejM +vTsw+gDXmYliWOdyECTFSiHXY2O1ylgy77fgmJslrgwacavi7VXt8YLEIuqexPTjdly bqzYIgi9QRNSY6Wllhk4rWKDlF9DDuxSQ+iWU0Np1x8vec26ad0ALMzbmgY6/g0iQ7J9 VjUS4JNTQJqvK4IQZEtIB5LHLqt3u/Jgyqtm34xTFEZf6QCO4oh/sFEJgkwB6levYzLp 1PiYHyV4AtK4B002Yai/jFcrosWIByjtw1qtdYNeFp/VG3l/YZtg9fxV03QRZnZ3r5zT 2vrA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3ZKnGXHK81dI/E17OJxCehYTg2aYBRCE/e2vGiVy9Cc8LAfjrE ELOX/01ovndsZ1WEx5X45Y8hcg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeL5eMX6jzViqqhPO52b0DTXPUprkUuprvr5xpbvU9gI9CPa7bPYRViI7vhO1WGjH7xb95VGw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:3243:: with SMTP id j64-v6mr4817427ita.23.1529580669803; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 04:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c102-v6sm675079itd.3.2018.06.21.04.31.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 04:31:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #31702 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:31:08 -0400 Message-ID: <87wousqsub.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) # not an Emacs bug, probably tags 31702 + notabug quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 01 21:11:14 2019 Received: (at 31702-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2019 01:11:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQhwd-00055I-1w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:11:13 -0400 Received: from host.gofardesign.uk ([208.79.239.190]:48550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQhwY-00054a-KS for 31702-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 21:11:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jvuw1S8cuVOS4BMhTu5rlwda5LHD879UllPGOeiYUKE=; b=g5svivglNSEJE282s53jrFKGvz nbybT0wYPaZj+505AgQ02au5gMO4NqYT/SsyPS3fpST/jAeNBrCzoKBcP/5UnuNWFqWtNa82SoDF5 Q/Jpj/GdnAoxkw1Y8YpRZMHktr1tXQFcu0vKw0LYOJwbNy4AILIjpP/1JAQf/b2oRaWE=; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:56450 helo=localhost) by host.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iQhwS-0008L8-To; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 20:11:01 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#31702: In-Reply-To: <83o9gqbc4a.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:11:33 +0300") References: <83o9gqbc4a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 02:10:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87wocjrskc.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: host.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 31702-done Cc: Carlos Pita , 31702-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Carlos Pita >> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:25:28 -0300 >> >> All in all I'm not sure how to feel about this issue. Despite the >> external inconsistency emacs is internally coherent and, according to >> what I described in my second comment, I would say it's selecting a >> more accurate effective height than the desktop. But, anyway, the >> inconsistency is annoying and it's not even possible to get the same >> font from the resources file since the size/height granularity is less >> than the one offered by emacs face specification. > > Then maybe you can convince the developers of the desktop to follow > Emacs's example ;-) So I take that to mean that we don't want to change anything in Emacs, and I'm therefore closing this bug report now. If that's incorrect, please reopen the bug report. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:26:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator