From unknown Wed Sep 10 13:55:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31658: 25.2; Number of changes undone should be controlled by a variable Resent-From: Ruy Exel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 18:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 31658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 31658@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15277032323191 (code B ref -1); Wed, 30 May 2018 18:01:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2018 18:00:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55389 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5Oh-0000pP-No for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5Og-0000pE-VD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5OW-0003VY-3B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:25 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:46825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5OV-0003VU-WB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60762) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5OU-0001F5-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5OU-0003TZ-26 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:18 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]:44967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fO5OT-0003TF-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 14:00:17 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c128-v6so7891547oig.11 for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:00:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DjruHky3/BFkuLWSTp7Vw6DA3R59BNdrROemO+ZQ5ec=; b=sOW0Qbtinexn4lNKISBfmOs9It4hMuR41ba3MPQc3ZN9n3iOVTVJGjwW8H4PSPLboI QbOyv/zjeHkyqVZcZHYFKOGF7jr36o6o7MjJSpQY/h6+qK0oGvlv9v+D9ReY3SeUc8WB kOx8hhZkcFVhf2/6Qe/Rzj90bzvQVPWyJMxRD5aHU88idYWbGviysOP5+J+qaWiNl/25 VhttlWPW9EORpdv9jfCFxuihFRa0jy3+C9s0SGUOoU2FHXAWmwGzc7o0WmBSaqXqbN6J eir38Fwoq6PEhq5iHODME1STqSimE6fJIz+lGOf36LLcF5DydbmKxXLSTF2xOuO6qriN oTyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DjruHky3/BFkuLWSTp7Vw6DA3R59BNdrROemO+ZQ5ec=; b=OPOqQgkVUslJZ+rwXdLUrhwXUKtCgT2D/mN4PeGR6/RzilTpK70WbFNrBhHo5WEAg5 ys7gpbT2bagR7mylWgJOgi9HmQAOod5pS2ynW/YJLDa8u22y0CCIJvlVJAIor5rjwgLh fMK2u56afliTJveYvo6Oi13JTdpGR+Nx4rgYMcUIK/YuBq7eaZOUBsR6eaiM+sd9UugH rHu+SmhlFxzOGEFgm0XvPfmW23gDT0ciW63OHRQGGZvSGd43u7zd2ZvlHdtFsPIGwTGY HwtH/N2kObJ1ZbKlTstALR3bu+07pPAzCDGaX9Ra05hU3Jck3mdHxADTuzsbK3mFDfjn Cg7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdI2/KIfjroqxFgGZiROrvKR3hpvp1xyk0ytz8aj1BFmDyC2Gpe 6bGgmb+KH9asXqlF4rZNpOWYIH1Jac8MEcsHo/4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLGMCLg5yw3GoiD9/2fuuRCwbwqmmUYSY2u5iBoEE696gbXfmyIQK3qL2WCr2mC/5SUVc4FbJ1IWtIT2SAwhVM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3ad6:: with SMTP id h205-v6mr1932654oia.185.1527703216288; Wed, 30 May 2018 11:00:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac9:410a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Ruy Exel Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:59:35 -0300 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) After I updated Emacs to the latest version I noticed that the behavior of the undo command has changed in the sense that a single invocation of undo effectively undoes many more recent changes than it used to and I often find myself having to re-do the changes and reentering the whole information again rather than taking advantage of the undo command. After a little fiddling I realized that this feature is controlled by the function 'undo-auto-amalgamate' which contains the line (< last-amalgamating-count 20) apparently bundling up to 20 recent changes for the next invocation of undo. My solution was simply to edit that function, replacing 20 by zero, and the old behavior, which I am used to, was restored. The purpose of this bug-report/feature-request is to suggest that instead of hard coding a fixed number, such as 20, the number of changes bundled together should be determined by a variable which the user could customize if desired. In GNU Emacs 25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.23) of 2017-12-09 built on tictoc Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11501000 System Description: Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 06 18:15:34 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2018 22:15:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37174 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQgiL-0002uH-Qf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:15:33 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:51282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQgiJ-0002u5-UX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:15:32 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n7-v6so10299749itn.1 for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:15:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=gKD6a4jnoSnnAzh9TpG4f1f43vTqjYmX+/kreoFohbs=; b=sokc0zr4q8tKwusi/E/vccrYqc7UcoVxCsl0R/EJ5YideX6E4y0UACL91EX1cxlYyK 4kJ7sroUIR4UtgIUBP4ue1+vNBaN47JRl8hk3dZs6B5uEWQmbM6VRAk4N0c1IzPPd6Ub 2huZhUYJzHvSrQkkM8eoSbxUYk799FX68U9E+yHDg68I8zbvVVbVaGDWz+Ipp6LA0VbP 1A2xLpFzpXbx/EUqD0qxnDivNYKoPkwV5stgemwZepweEDjK+xJBAqo/azsF+BBQjbBp Lw6T9ugsJWkfqq0poc5Zu7i4+FBpHlwgVpz8OS2aN/xMto9jL6lUSZyfAJyx6vU4ECKC T3mg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=gKD6a4jnoSnnAzh9TpG4f1f43vTqjYmX+/kreoFohbs=; b=Xag/IIRpduhrXI+3m6ce42GgAuJKNMsLe6LQGNeHF6oB6SwDbzXQPEU+GvnOVGCr4a E8STnWfUo5euCOLfNBPp91JNfn8FMO2s9v5cOXykBUsOvdwXsvAVqT+PRL+1Txk2ubQj W2lg3OBh56Kky2S0SIMI5JoMooh8r78a9n3efHHkVum15FwN3e5sJFtG2cBLLew8gkDs JcPP53/id4ntT5uivJT/mrt+H1XeYNF8xKciP7fdQAWpB0CWPr/1agIm+5Cenwnv48Fd 5/BfZF7YZSsksqqqzSQLyiTQGcuKsRuUMqQtfgczVPJbQ91UZ5sITIvZNyfyAzJenHSU zwmw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0A8jcSIvIV9ZA7X2/3PtMUjy8B24cWUsJGCrOeKlRTsBZFlHi1 CC7qawmEgn5wyfxwIyg8+I9CtV/i X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLhvvMl8wny3yAyjQ2xmon6v9G+Hn/An9Sst3Zr5wkwqXVF8CNuCrRH6HnuwUyjvRIQ7flISA== X-Received: by 2002:a24:52cb:: with SMTP id d194-v6mr4900638itb.46.1528323326342; Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y204-v6sm11555949ioy.88.2018.06.06.15.15.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #31658 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 18:15:24 -0400 Message-ID: <87bmcn4l4z.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) severity 31658 wishlist quit From unknown Wed Sep 10 13:55:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31658: 25.2; Number of changes undone should be controlled by a variable Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 22:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ruy Exel Cc: 31658@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31658.157065834613234 (code B ref 31658); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 22:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 31658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2019 21:59:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJz7-0003RO-N4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:59:06 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45222) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJz6-0003RE-2w for 31658@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:59:04 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJz2-00059P-Uq; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:59:03 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:58:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Ruy Exel's message of "Wed, 30 May 2018 14:59:35 -0300") Message-ID: <878spt1syo.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ruy Exel writes: > After I updated Emacs to the latest version I noticed that the behavior > of the undo command has changed in the sense that a single invocation of > undo effectively undoes many more recent changes [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Ruy Exel writes: > After I updated Emacs to the latest version I noticed that the behavior > of the undo command has changed in the sense that a single invocation of > undo effectively undoes many more recent changes than it used to and I > often find myself having to re-do the changes and reentering the whole > information again rather than taking advantage of the undo command. > > After a little fiddling I realized that this feature is controlled by > the function 'undo-auto-amalgamate' which contains the line > > (< last-amalgamating-count 20) > > apparently bundling up to 20 recent changes for the next invocation of > undo. > > My solution was simply to edit that function, replacing 20 by zero, and > the old behavior, which I am used to, was restored. > > The purpose of this bug-report/feature-request is to suggest that > instead of hard coding a fixed number, such as 20, the number of changes > bundled together should be determined by a variable which the user could > customize if desired. I think that sounds like a reasonable (and useful) request. Does anybody object to adding such a defcustom? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Wed Sep 10 13:55:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31658: 25.2; Number of changes undone should be controlled by a variable Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: ruyexel@gmail.com, 31658@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31658.157069276127026 (code B ref 31658); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 07:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 31658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Oct 2019 07:32:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iISwD-00071q-HO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:32:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42283) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iISwC-00071c-Fn for 31658@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:32:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iISw7-0002Qp-BI; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:32:35 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3660 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iISw6-0002u9-9k; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:32:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:19 +0300 Message-Id: <835zkxt5rw.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <878spt1syo.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:58:55 +0200) References: <878spt1syo.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:58:55 +0200 > Cc: 31658@debbugs.gnu.org > > > The purpose of this bug-report/feature-request is to suggest that > > instead of hard coding a fixed number, such as 20, the number of changes > > bundled together should be determined by a variable which the user could > > customize if desired. > > I think that sounds like a reasonable (and useful) request. Does > anybody object to adding such a defcustom? Let's begin with defvar, please. I'm not sure I like exposing the bowels of undo to users, there be dragons. From unknown Wed Sep 10 13:55:53 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31658: 25.2; Number of changes undone should be controlled by a variable Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: ruyexel@gmail.com, 31658@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31658.15707786916542 (code B ref 31658); Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:25:01 +0000 Received: (at 31658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2019 07:24:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57586 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIpIB-0001hS-Bc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:24:51 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIpIA-0001hA-4H for 31658@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:24:50 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIpI5-0001je-UM; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:24:48 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <878spt1syo.fsf@gnus.org> <835zkxt5rw.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:24:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <835zkxt5rw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:32:19 +0300") Message-ID: <874l0fpww2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I think that sounds like a reasonable (and useful) request. Does >> anybody object to adding such a defcustom? > > Let's begin with defvar, please. I'm not sure I like exposing the > bowels of undo [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I think that sounds like a reasonable (and useful) request. Does >> anybody object to adding such a defcustom? > > Let's begin with defvar, please. I'm not sure I like exposing the > bowels of undo to users, there be dragons. OK; done. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 11 03:24:59 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Oct 2019 07:25:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIpIJ-0001hq-MO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:24:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:55284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIpIF-0001hc-IN for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:24:58 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIpIC-0001jn-Pn for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:24:54 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:24:52 +0200 Message-Id: <8736fzpwvv.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #31658 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 31658 fixed close 31658 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31658 fixed close 31658 27.1 quit