GNU bug report logs - #31654
emacs-lisp-intro.texi - backtrace

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
Cc: 31654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#31654: emacs-lisp-intro.texi - backtrace
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 17:44:08 +0300

> From: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 13:00:02 +1000
> Cc: 31654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> How about something like a universal argument for level of detail of verbosity? for backtrace.

I don't see why it would be useful.  Backtraces must be as accurate as
possible, showing the exact sequence of calls, so that the user who
debugs the problem could step through the relevant code.  Omitting
parts of a backtrace because they might be "ugly" or "confusing" would
be a disservice, I think.  I have never seen any practical use case
where that would be a good idea.  And I don't think I've seen a
debugger that provides such a feature.

Does anyone see a practical use case for such a feature?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.