From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 14:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15275181202825 (code B ref -1); Mon, 28 May 2018 14:36:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2018 14:35:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52493 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJF2-0000jV-Cj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJF0-0000jH-Oa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJEu-0006YP-TO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:13 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJEu-0006YD-Pk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48639) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJEt-0006GL-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJEo-0006Oe-Ew for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:11 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:40026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNJEo-0006L8-40 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2018 10:35:06 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4SEQEZZ193766 for ; Mon, 28 May 2018 14:35:03 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=E6N4Vp6SJT7kHPHF6hKReQKavUHQ2E+VOgyODI7CXmM=; b=fWY/iit74YQfr2BiLg2gNCERdpuDmTRShfayyz26s+XaLBvsRXDbOVOt3DNFcmYLd/aJ z/7qwU+dtYL7Pym4d0LZwg+o+MKFuTEtWbxezUfGJRSeHdiu9uSlmChxqYAqvJouSPmC YcS6CupfC8C9entnlWwxaXnc839/cP1ntnHdzNrLgyqSCxZXsBU4xpZv/P2QqPX11Lem G8QikNwKdcPTqv7bh4ptnpZdURJtEGOUG+8ifGEO2Vu9KiY6nHgp8dqZqwol6LQIX1Kg rXbc3/lT4eBOIyUjjZUzfi4we4n0Vv3r+2sbQx+7FvjzxYRuCQ5xYR6THOIEGHDOxafk hA== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2j7084wfrm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 28 May 2018 14:35:03 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4SEZ19v009376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 28 May 2018 14:35:02 GMT Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4SEZ1xc026328 for ; Mon, 28 May 2018 14:35:01 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4690.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8906 signatures=668702 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805280175 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) >From the text of index entry "; in comment" I would expect a node that talks about the use of `;' inside a comment. I cannot imagine what other sense someone might make of this index-entry text. But the target of the index entry, node `Comments', does not seem to say anything about a `;' character inside a comment. Please consider fixing this somehow - not sure what was intended. Perhaps the entry text needs to be changed. Or perhaps it the entry is not pointing at the correct node. Or perhaps the node text needs to be changed, to address whatever the entry is supposed to suggest. In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 3, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2018-03-21 Repository revision: e70d0c9e66d7a8609450b2889869d16aeb0363b5 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601 Configured using: `configure --without-dbus --host=3Dx86_64-w64-mingw32 --without-compress-install -C 'CFLAGS=3D-O2 -static -g3'' From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 23:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.15276367527524 (code B ref 31623); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2018 23:32:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo6S-0001xI-Jo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:32:32 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:34700) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNo6R-0001x5-2n for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:32:31 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id c5-v6so30428135itj.1 for <31623@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 16:32:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=wvAgmetLansIH50mDcbbXF5zjbHZ9BJQMCmPv8D7BA4=; b=GqzoMuIQTbFUZ8vbR5zVYjsORS9A/fmoABMHPc6ppj/O5x8BL8Vqx4oJMNl3todzm6 aETGN0XKT2QLfw2R2Kq0xaoiFrohD/qSlHeArkxn3Ju474O6g4+N444/TxYTXt0aMK6Q sB7Y/KJZc4oUK8ij2CP5Y405AhdmnHksu9NE/EsLem+yHfK9UzZ8ql2ybWePUP20hFSV OKE/VPMaj5Y5nd87rSxrQzOHVb7M+Es6A7KAfSxuD2yViTY50qQv9+klaSdbev7wYn7h appeK32KciGZQ2LOX7/3fqt8XPJeYulSMH08hVgapy5UmTdZtgmgiaF/iMhMTnVehGhg /l+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=wvAgmetLansIH50mDcbbXF5zjbHZ9BJQMCmPv8D7BA4=; b=iFXxwH/u3raJqRklmA5v7wb3XpEvdA82J8WeUPCU+o0zI7ISIlwY65Ih66ueeMdX01 6HztzU4317t213ieqb9LfASshYvldD7fuWoSbk+nou5hjc8cdmPwk0dPNfQwSqYYcv6e csu5gj3ZobVg94mGJujb1qemwURsGpAwJG5713lc/jauhL2+RYpDWPsLBPjD5uqJBmkE wRH/QeZNURvNC+I+N9y81oZr3ITncsXGEnCjT8YbKACQPbGQywhphJIJw8coNI6Gs/Mm R0MrEiZgVwZVN5eWSJbNPcFFf3c8FT0JuhUXgwoFLoil2dLsFpvsFkR/e/tN1MVW7eUN x3KA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcatbS/0Jm3Q5DTQ+IJUk6HTkJwLzUElz5VzbzhjLs18b8xLSDQ BLshS9GH5arfuUSFr8p006EY6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLstR/jq8riQ2+RuZKm5BTFT4VQqo07hrCQwnxRd3LZt5TM/WxE9Wyuvonx3i+34azMm7aPzA== X-Received: by 2002:a24:3992:: with SMTP id l140-v6mr905453ita.33.1527636745432; Tue, 29 May 2018 16:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d199-v6sm6254416ioe.51.2018.05.29.16.32.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 May 2018 16:32:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky References: Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 19:32:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 28 May 2018 07:35:00 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: > From the text of index entry "; in comment" I would expect a node that > talks about the use of `;' inside a comment. I cannot imagine what > other sense someone might make of this index-entry text. > > But the target of the index entry, node `Comments', does not seem to > say anything about a `;' character inside a comment. As far as I can tell, it refers to this sentence: In Lisp, a semicolon (`;') starts a comment if it is not within a string or character constant. So, if it is not "within a string or character constant" then the semicolon is in a comment. From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 23:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.15276376398860 (code B ref 31623); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2018 23:47:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNoKk-0002Iq-U1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:47:19 -0400 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:55712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNoKi-0002Ic-Cs for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 19:47:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4TNlAVq114600; Tue, 29 May 2018 23:47:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=FnP3HFGToX6rXpxleUo1hvVa+vWSUqRjadQXhn/qEJA=; b=VG7zH8q5E1Thkm6gqKUv7gVt2lHmv/jv5nlcqCrDe+pt82aHquCY52t03Me9fs42jEG9 MES9Tjr91k5WiBKMf55PX/kOFNkkR8yDloBGYisJzU429ixBjAdU/Ojr4vhbE8TefZjh AXTLSsc560AObJU9lKeGqsjfyBjfdsjEwkM2K9Pxqt90cMjSoMciVJsisi/4BHja23zM R3x7zIMqHHdCoqhPAcLonVSmx5rmRWzNp7Xm6+pjnWp6NdR+3/KWy21thKnjStFqf6Qi sLmTBF0t+Zy/E3qwQnqp5Igy5eqonXTSA2hSQbYgrH2D6/KeCb9/C7g0xjnQPRCJQwq+ Hg== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2j9ev8885b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:47:10 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4TNl9SE011982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:47:09 GMT Received: from abhmp0007.oracle.com (abhmp0007.oracle.com [141.146.116.13]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4TNl8vj018275; Tue, 29 May 2018 23:47:09 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 16:47:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4690.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8908 signatures=668702 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1805290253 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > > From the text of index entry "; in comment" I would expect a node that > > talks about the use of `;' inside a comment. I cannot imagine what > > other sense someone might make of this index-entry text. > > > > But the target of the index entry, node `Comments', does not seem to > > say anything about a `;' character inside a comment. >=20 > As far as I can tell, it refers to this sentence: >=20 > In Lisp, a semicolon (`;') starts a comment if it is not > within a string or character constant. >=20 > So, if it is not "within a string or character constant" then the > semicolon is in a comment. OK, if you say so. ;-) I was thinking more about "in" meaning after `comment-start'. But yes, I guess that's what was intended. If that's the intention then I think it might be clearer if the index entry were "; outside a comment" or maybe "; not in a comment". In any case, that statement is not really true: a semicolon does not always start a comment in Lisp whenever it is not within a string or a character constant. There is also the case of it being escaped in a symbol name. E.g., (setq a\;b 42) (Dunno whether there are additional cases - perhaps not.) From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 00:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.152763928311262 (code B ref 31623); Wed, 30 May 2018 00:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2018 00:14:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54460 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNolH-0002vZ-77 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 20:14:43 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:40419) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNolF-0002vJ-Sm for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 20:14:42 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j186-v6so21180847ita.5 for <31623@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:14:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=vo8Q5wVrSwu50qXiO1ByZAlHv2nplQcr7fIAJewhEYI=; b=VUS1tARnFx+w+3sBjukqLDockm7YgMPOE+UmakMF9/zePZJvSOjPBE0ZbpULByVFsF deqbiMZTXnShcmG87ioQkSaWYfQRPhXQOPVzTLkB2dPo0EDuzkb3HHM7QJ42JNfBULaX RW9NZoYP67T3QiQFySrwhDSZQsjCisFWD9/QMKtRJbcjNWVaQNCrCb8iZqw34618flP2 z8Rp8LRamF58hNqueCnMvUqm9OqR2jS+dTiQSv+sCZoSnQFuHQQqX+wVmndGEiN3gVxC GSu86kopXW4ZsWJtEmoqR5SNzP91p1kz7TNpKqU6q9lrFAYrpIl5GSXC1YEAYBnSw4PP aITw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vo8Q5wVrSwu50qXiO1ByZAlHv2nplQcr7fIAJewhEYI=; b=WPLiTs4YS1cES/+5wonqA7Vb7EzVJT5NdG7uAEOh3F0dr82jlUFrUvHsHh0S5LQTk2 z7cKLmmWXaHkDi5sN3WdIUrdOYe/SPrx0tvStGXh36cRUhf6D4FQnALaL5P/x9MNsOHS tBldFc4cRn7J92Dq+4WC7dE2Jbp+nQOwYWs+Wx22H2nsBMkqStuBk9UZMxU6b+QMTM+l gkshugQwUaroeVkc/VjZKjuAIfGaZqKN4c+ZaQA/YJGDPCcHAm5Lczs1sBQ7zYR8BAOF 0qRZ1ArobEcqdwCGg2I/wiLbJsszUmM4QiYcNfqhu73fCw4Eu6NL/4dEdUqJRd+/9QDp bb8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweT4bRAtwD449/2BTGsPRa9GAHd+MiW8XO7bjC51ixDDNQbmB// z+e2CmDC/K9Jl/BWSqiGi/yzEQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKK/37u3gxZI5AK+J4g8AXZl0g/GZ4r8SSinoVcFPThzFk9VdU3C6x4eL18PuYsrZ/tn3kTbBw== X-Received: by 2002:a24:b106:: with SMTP id o6-v6mr1006391itf.15.1527639276215; Tue, 29 May 2018 17:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x189-v6sm8068968ite.2.2018.05.29.17.14.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 May 2018 17:14:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 20:14:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 16:47:07 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Drew Adams writes: > OK, if you say so. ;-) I was thinking more about "in" > meaning after `comment-start'. But yes, I guess that's > what was intended. > > If that's the intention then I think it might be clearer > if the index entry were "; outside a comment" or maybe > "; not in a comment". A later sentence in `(elisp) Comments' has: The Lisp reader discards comments; they do not become part of the Lisp objects which represent the program within the Lisp system. The discarded comment includes the leading ";", so I don't think it makes sense to treat the comment starter as being outside the comment. > In any case, that statement is not really true: a semicolon > does not always start a comment in Lisp whenever it is not > within a string or a character constant. There is also the > case of it being escaped in a symbol name. E.g., > > (setq a\;b 42) > > (Dunno whether there are additional cases - perhaps not.) I think not. So add "unescaped"? In Lisp, an unescaped semicolon (`;') starts a comment if it is not within a string or character constant. From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 00:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.152764074013593 (code B ref 31623); Wed, 30 May 2018 00:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2018 00:39:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNp8l-0003XA-S1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:00 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:56866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNp8k-0003Wx-Bb for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 20:38:58 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4U0ccqR075272; Wed, 30 May 2018 00:38:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=ab80YG4//BnpXgx0RN9HJeEsM7yAtuYzbUotK4J8nac=; b=S1OYGdwMI1hgbA/WNG/UzdL9GqBgu5XLGCwk3Lib1FwoisoJEEXS7X1dEZvpeAxe2Ray 8f44eg7Vgg9VdZ8MJc767S72i0SySlnuKRCrz6iQvoOSxdwYwHnzjiQPoBb+/VzkQMfR K3q8o2V6ojbT433QbRatBO4WxAM7vPEgp8mdlJZTAXN6CQIGbnVHf6Scrso/JXmh55bk wj6C1D6jGw7XG4FEaF06L0hn2Jcb/3Pe97lXZGk+m0+wVKM9bL82WfeRmCq/MxSiBiap Xcn5ls8DtbNNElfQZzr7qmNvvTbOlSQci2qPH/6Y9WIkV1TRbK5QXTT5bbmuoN3KCwXt Iw== Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2j9ev88agp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 May 2018 00:38:51 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4U0cpnL002615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 May 2018 00:38:51 GMT Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w4U0co0l007021; Wed, 30 May 2018 00:38:51 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 17:38:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4690.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8908 signatures=668702 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1805300005 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > > OK, if you say so. ;-) I was thinking more about "in" > > meaning after `comment-start'. But yes, I guess that's > > what was intended. > > > > If that's the intention then I think it might be clearer > > if the index entry were "; outside a comment" or maybe > > "; not in a comment". >=20 > A later sentence in `(elisp) Comments' has: >=20 > The Lisp reader discards comments; they do not become part of the > Lisp objects which represent the program within the Lisp system. >=20 > The discarded comment includes the leading ";", so I don't think it > makes sense to treat the comment starter as being outside the comment. Of course. I didn't mean anything different. My point was that seeing an index entry "; in comment" I thought it likely referred to a `;' char in the commented text. I did not think that it was likely to be about the places where a `;' char is considered to be a `comment-start' char. But certainly the `;' that starts a comment is part of the comment itself. No one would doubt that, I think. > > In any case, that statement is not really true: a semicolon > > does not always start a comment in Lisp whenever it is not > > within a string or a character constant. There is also the > > case of it being escaped in a symbol name. E.g., > > > > (setq a\;b 42) > > > > (Dunno whether there are additional cases - perhaps not.) >=20 > I think not. So add "unescaped"? >=20 > In Lisp, an unescaped semicolon (`;') starts a comment > if it is not within a string or character constant. Fine by me. Thanks in advance for making that change. But I really think the index entry leaves something to be desired - which is what this bug report is about. The entry should indicate something about the subject indexed. "; in comment" does not do that, for me, at least. In the case of the intended indexing, it's about where `;' can start a Lisp comment - or more precisely, in which contexts it does _not_ start a comment. Someone looking that up might look for an entry such as just ";" (you'd expect the subject to cover what `;' can be used for in Lisp - which it does: comment start, char constant, escaped char). Or perhaps an entry such as "; as comment start" (but that doesn't really suggest that the text will also talk about other contexts for `;'). Or perhaps an entry such as "; used for commenting". Or perhaps you have a suggestion. From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.152764550620575 (code B ref 31623); Wed, 30 May 2018 01:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2018 01:58:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqNa-0005Lj-Tf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:26 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:41741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqNV-0005LU-VH for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:21 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t5-v6so7200173ioa.8 for <31623@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=8p+/QgWgNHzG39o+++/a4AHcokiTIrcqACLyxg7MWKE=; b=MnAvFBv0QUH8URIzay5N0k8K2vohS9l0oLxARq2k5lvC7aBfA6s1ZEuAk/j7PRpEsV 1y0lRXCH4i1qeXGl8ENV83z7C2MKw30PEvbLgVpwoYyCkrpNSVBeuYdHVPXwV5pVKvj3 4XHgJhtcq/yO73/GPYLPOqJ8wiJ2iovAim02KF8McIcdi1oyYboI+1opMGB+8WqD8NfE A6JdDwSsiVYv719gyRcBBkgwLK3rI7vJWeKHskEPseayQuaN2NnqLxYwqbNS8njFQztI LcXpDt7EAXdSAb0bkKQii+c7PVxMjCIqlzdhBfgDSWiIGfXLZQQE61eASxSMjhh6a0MR T2xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8p+/QgWgNHzG39o+++/a4AHcokiTIrcqACLyxg7MWKE=; b=AjN0f1A+AMwUZE0K2Cjw/F26lN9EBFzAo6duoq3XiGkrzgOanxLoNsirSa/z9mMDgS qDfukj+vqMiwkZ1Rhx19UjWv0o+MdiBWjSII1aF78m62m0kFzNWaqEatcx/i8EtcJ2Wu TZJbTNg2rx5co+ikQfc1BVf8QjC+g/uthzLgsXkVoYLDctkr4FZby/r2Ctak9ZHRP2VO j+CsmeqV3eqFwXINuvp6LKn5EKPyn5S0gvasrdivvPo7aNnt9Y3EehICZNnp6bf3c5DN gYwIuOUmDwMPeQg34fhry9KuKBjh+AQEY5dD/KxXmeSKJFVMaJgGYHdQjC8hEuH/H4z2 Rpjg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E17UIS7mE260VQ2qBS4322qQqhhoYaQ68HO/VBLOHzArOYTM68H VSwJajmwGYz4fQlbHWbRukAy2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLluFAwsr9meCZt629cKNUh6F3uwKOytZvZfqjHBrceMPZicK/zjlRu026JTdevDr4fueElog== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:150:: with SMTP id 77-v6mr610944iob.138.1527645492286; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q21-v6sm11325106itb.4.2018.05.29.18.58.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 May 2018 18:58:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 17:38:49 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: <871sdtdhvx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Drew Adams writes: >> > If that's the intention then I think it might be clearer >> > if the index entry were "; outside a comment" or maybe >> > "; not in a comment". > But certainly the `;' that starts a comment is part of the > comment itself. No one would doubt that, I think. I'm a bit puzzled then. How would "; outside a comment" make sense for a page which talks about comments? That seems to be the opposite of what it's about. > The entry should indicate something about the subject > indexed. "; in comment" does not do that, for me, at > least. What do you think about the "(...) in lists" entry? > Or perhaps you have a suggestion. I don't really see a problem with the current one, but I guess "; for commenting" (in the same vein as "' for quoting") could be okay. From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 02:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.152764700423023 (code B ref 31623); Wed, 30 May 2018 02:24:01 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2018 02:23:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54507 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqlo-0005zH-CK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 22:23:24 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:56400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqlm-0005z3-Ke for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 22:23:23 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w4U2LNQY078577; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:23:15 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=UxppGw58dW2sRKsAe5I2GzZGI4Y2eBlFZw3HD3N+m4U=; b=gfehwLWhq7pWZXpK4XxanMYSusS+jARtx9/vu6eFyFFneBM953ioAeIQGeZyLw1OH4dG CZWSa16YO5Zhu0ZP0WWgZL1rZpAHtSVI+JqtPUCQww4u6KIuNP+nFTutuBIk2oF9ln71 M42K9krsfC1r4C1EBYiH/k79RuDnPLRWmULgQoIXbuzOPKdzrRJYrONAu0SScR8fStxF m7uL24ORn6ZwkifaTlSPqNPHJmATZyeiL4XO+mlYbi9qsYRDDnHxwdqLkWRLx72rNfbd tSQBaDbA7CHSvtpLbrJerqrl/RbpYBR9CMsT2GEGUNp75YKywIzbgUD9QjomnRrTxYVa sw== Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2j9ev80fj0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 May 2018 02:23:15 +0000 Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w4U2NFIX005456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 May 2018 02:23:15 GMT Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w4U2NEuM009818; Wed, 30 May 2018 02:23:15 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <768edb20-d1d3-4c9b-9f44-4c17a8df8e41@default> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 19:23:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Drew Adams References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> <871sdtdhvx.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <871sdtdhvx.fsf@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4690.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8908 signatures=668702 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1805300023 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > >> > If that's the intention then I think it might be clearer > >> > if the index entry were "; outside a comment" or maybe > >> > "; not in a comment". >=20 > > But certainly the `;' that starts a comment is part of the > > comment itself. No one would doubt that, I think. >=20 > I'm a bit puzzled then. How would "; outside a comment" make sense for > a page which talks about comments? That seems to be the opposite of > what it's about. That's not a great index entry either. The target text is not at all about `;' in text that is commented. It is only about `;' used as a comment-start char. > > The entry should indicate something about the subject > > indexed. "; in comment" does not do that, for me, at > > least. >=20 > What do you think about the "(...) in lists" entry? Never noticed it. At least it's not a character. If I had to guess naively, I'd probably expect that to take me to some text about nested lists. IMO, it too is a bad index entry. It's not clear at all what someone might be looking for who would find that a description that might help her find what is sought. > > Or perhaps you have a suggestion. >=20 > I don't really see a problem with the current one, but I guess "; for > commenting" (in the same vein as "' for quoting") could be okay. From unknown Tue Aug 12 08:34:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Drew Adams Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.152949890519589 (code B ref 31623); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2018 12:48:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVcXB-00055o-Ee for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:48:25 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:42217) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fVcX9-00055W-AZ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:48:23 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r24-v6so3322964ioh.9; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=drX369Ij0do7s+kJ7ozDk6YPTz3rXfOOlnKP1Idqc2k=; b=q6AKf5BVFElHiD3Im8x5j78v3nqqdRRziequxeUdqu46OzoPiDmm1ZgnvgeQNO39ps trqb/4ysQLRbh3WLVBzliUjrJWIk+13FELdlMEXgF01TqieO7xjiSu6FLA4WGvVQR3jp j5GX80CZ6fI9CFc3MQDcQRy3rgLh0Hmw/QUlVCeJjP7WEB2zkryNGEy3MqkSuiNyPzfi YhNHQwi0Ezf+pfLHwszQPLjEevaiYCfOyzFeArG09g9Bf013ndioITFI6/akWIBY+/uU 6+SuXbW925UO8pcFEXgo9kurDcuYcbp63JzTlZeI03XQEOue9zU+e7iXX9kRRdKgMcos 70Xw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=drX369Ij0do7s+kJ7ozDk6YPTz3rXfOOlnKP1Idqc2k=; b=AFILuYE5jYqhmiEfClEKG+OjtGnloKU8OQCNxM7uz7LyaYxBGzbfaeeCTtCM0oKj+T 65jAiredcf7YLUHiBbA8MOrJDiZTuHdc6wOKoM2mqww89baZZihLn8RkJMnnFYALNzHX dWnv7nx7DnP61QuU3XI4COwErBiFD+HcV7cV5eulPOp48Y3e+VaSp/7jEWcaVOoijBkg nd/v55d6VuVGlzrEBjO8J25Zmiw+zjsrW+bgcDeqWauH0UfVJz0KnLrezXw20KKo830R /E4p+bFzht1BOn6j2EY6Oy1xqjlbd5Byj6ekm5ks5He6aAVBnuIyvknZsS65KYy/J5KC hehQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2usDIUgJ5Jw70y6w5vkBCQgQDUJ4IeWquH8QBeuCMchULL9ecc JAyQDigJPiPlEfq95LfrjlMLzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLutL26lWMY7I9oxmpkKAuXbxXVDlDLU52lwLCvlmcKgeAzVzRUZpfz6r0rZczDjFUJlFzJiA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8d05:: with SMTP id p5-v6mr17620785iod.59.1529498897788; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c24-v6sm1190764itd.39.2018.06.20.05.48.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:48:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> <871sdtdhvx.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:48:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871sdtdhvx.fsf@gmail.com> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:10 -0400") Message-ID: <87a7rpsjxr.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 31623 fixed close 31623 26.2 quit Noam Postavsky writes: > I guess "; for commenting" (in the same vein as "' for quoting") could > be okay. Pushed to emacs-26. [1: 40e1db8ccd]: 2018-06-20 08:46:13 -0400 Change index of ";" to better reflect it's usage (Bug#31623) https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=40e1db8ccd1239fc7da5ccd3f5f79017b2b44afc