GNU bug report logs - #31585
27.0.50; 112GB Virtual Memory; 102MB working set

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: markusffm <at> fn.de

Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 21:49:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 31585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
Cc: markusffm <at> fn.de, 31585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#31585: 27.0.50; 112GB Virtual Memory; 102MB working set
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 19:11:24 +0300
> From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 09:17:52 -0400
> Cc: "markusffm <at> fn.de" <markusffm <at> fn.de>
> 
> From: "markusffm\@fn.de" <markusffm <at> fn.de>
> To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: bug#31585: 27.0.50; 112GB Virtual Memory; 102MB working set
> 
> >
> >I meant, how did you start Emacs, and what actions did you take in Emacs
> invoked by emacs
> >before observing the 112GB virtual memory usage?
> no action. after running emacs for let me say an hour the size of the 
> working set increases to 170mb
> invoking emacs with -Q doesn't change anything either.

A working set of 170MB is quite normal.  What I don't understand is
how come such a moderate working set can cause a 112GB VM usage.

Any chance you could run some memory analyzing program and see what
part(s) reserve all that huge memory?




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 134 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.