GNU bug report logs - #31548
[PATCH] gnu: Add sbcl-stumpwm-checkout.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 08:45:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 31548 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust <at> gmail.com>
To: Andy Patterson <ajpatter <at> uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: 31548 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#31548] [PATCH] gnu: sbcl-stumpwm: Update to 18.05.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:39:26 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Andy,

Andy Patterson <ajpatter <at> uwaterloo.ca> writes:

[…]

>> Changing “name” field unfortunatelly breaks the build.  I didn't
>> investigate a reason yet and I don't want to push without changing
>> “name” field because users will install the “stumpwm-next” by default.
>
> I haven't looked much into your patch, but this might be because the
> asdf build system uses the package name to guess where the system will
> be defined. If the package name differs from the system name, this
> behaviour can be overridden using the #:asd-system-name argument.
>
> Hope that helps

It does, thank you.  For the record ‘#:asd-system-name "stumpwm"’.

Upstream pushed a new release.  I'll test it during current week and
push the following patch probably.

[0001-gnu-sbcl-stumpwm-Update-to-18.05.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
I don't know what to do with ‘sbcl-stumpwm-next’ package.  I think we
shouldn't push it because of our policy to stick with stable versions
for recipes.  But anybody fill free to ping me if you need next version.

Regards,
Oleg.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 6 years and 335 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.