GNU bug report logs -
#31541
eintr.info - roman numeral page numbering for Preface section in PDF
Previous Next
Reported by: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 00:59:01 UTC
Severity: minor
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 31541 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 31541 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 21 May 2018 00:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 21 May 2018 00:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello.
The Preface section of emacs-lisp-intro.pdf is expected to have roman numeral page numbering but the PDF produced doesn’t. The page numbering counts from page 1.
See the following texi file excerpt, see page 13 of 271 in the PDF viewer.
#+NAME: emacs-lisp-intro.texi
#+BEGIN_SRC texi -n 223
@c >>>> Set pageno appropriately <<<<
@c The first page of the Preface is a roman numeral; it is the first
@c right handed page after the Table of Contents; hence the following
@c setting must be for an odd negative number.
@c iftex
@c global <at> pageno = -11
@c end iftex
#+END_SRC
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 21 May 2018 14:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:58:34 +1000
>
> The Preface section of emacs-lisp-intro.pdf is expected to have roman numeral page numbering but the PDF produced doesn’t. The page numbering counts from page 1.
>
> See the following texi file excerpt, see page 13 of 271 in the PDF viewer.
>
> #+NAME: emacs-lisp-intro.texi
> #+BEGIN_SRC texi -n 223
> @c >>>> Set pageno appropriately <<<<
>
> @c The first page of the Preface is a roman numeral; it is the first
> @c right handed page after the Table of Contents; hence the following
> @c setting must be for an odd negative number.
>
> @c iftex
> @c global <at> pageno = -11
> @c end iftex
>
> #+END_SRC
So what is the bug you are complaining about? Is it that the comment
doesn't reflect the reality, or is it something else?
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 00:12:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> So what is the bug you are complaining about? Is it that the comment
> doesn't reflect the reality, or is it something else?
Is it a factual error that fails to reflect the current Emacs? to be fixed or not. Your call.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 02:41:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:11:09 +1000
> Cc: 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
>
> > Eli Zaretskii writes:
> >
> > So what is the bug you are complaining about? Is it that the comment
> > doesn't reflect the reality, or is it something else?
>
> Is it a factual error that fails to reflect the current Emacs? to be fixed or not. Your call.
Sorry, I don't understand: what do you mean by "the current Emacs"?
We are talking about the manual, right?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 02:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> Sorry, I don't understand: what do you mean by "the current Emacs"?
> We are talking about the manual, right?
My understanding of ``the current Emacs’’ is everything under directory emacs/ from a `git pull’. It could be the tip of master branch or Emacs 26, I guess.
I happen to be at release tag for Emacs 26.1-rc1.
Does that make sense? the current is a moving target.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 02:56:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> We are talking about the manual, right?
We are talking about the file emacs-lisp-intro.texi.
Third line has
: @setfilename ../../info/eintr.info
which was why I used `eintr.info’ in the Subject: line.
At issue is the comment which does not match the result produced in the PDF for page numbering lettering.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 16:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:46:52 +1000
> Cc: 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > Sorry, I don't understand: what do you mean by "the current Emacs"?
> > We are talking about the manual, right?
>
> My understanding of ``the current Emacs’’ is everything under directory emacs/ from a `git pull’.
Well, yes, but it's confusing to say "Emacs" when you really mean a
very specific part of it. It tends to produce miscommunication. It
is much better to be more specific, as in "manual" or "Emacs Lisp
Intro".
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 17:05:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Tue, 22 May 2018 17:05:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #28 received at 31541-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Van L <van <at> scratch.space>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:55:10 +1000
> Cc: 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> At issue is the comment which does not match the result produced in the PDF for page numbering lettering.
OK, I clarified in the comments what is that all about, and I'm
closing this bug report.
Thanks.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31541
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 23 May 2018 02:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #31 received at 31541 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> GNU bug Tracking System:
> what is that all about, and I'm
> closing this bug report.
In case this bug is revisited
best practise in contemporary
book publishing industry for
counting the pages in the Preface
should be evaluated to choose
the way forward for the numbering (or lettering)
in that
section.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 20 Jun 2018 11:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 364 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.