GNU bug report logs -
#31363
26.1; Fix gud-statement for pdb
Previous Next
Reported by: Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 11:48:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 26.1
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 31363 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 31363 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31363
; Package
emacs
.
(Fri, 04 May 2018 11:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 04 May 2018 11:48:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I'm using Python 3.6.5. When I have selected a simple expression (such
as 42) then run M-x gud-statement, it fails by saying
*** IndentationError: unexpected indent
The following changes fix the issue from here.
diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/gud.el b/lisp/progmodes/gud.el
index 15b428bb68..9cf818e99e 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/gud.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/gud.el
@@ -1694,8 +1694,7 @@ pdb
(gud-def gud-up "up" "<" "Up one stack frame.")
(gud-def gud-down "down" ">" "Down one stack frame.")
(gud-def gud-print "p %e" "\C-p" "Evaluate Python expression at point.")
- ;; Is this right?
- (gud-def gud-statement "! %e" "\C-e" "Execute Python statement at point.")
+ (gud-def gud-statement "!%e" "\C-e" "Execute Python statement at point.")
;; (setq comint-prompt-regexp "^(.*pdb[+]?) *")
(setq comint-prompt-regexp "^(Pdb) *")
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31363
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 05 May 2018 08:40:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 31363 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 19:47:15 +0800
>
> I'm using Python 3.6.5. When I have selected a simple expression (such
> as 42) then run M-x gud-statement, it fails by saying
>
> *** IndentationError: unexpected indent
>
> The following changes fix the issue from here.
Thanks. Is the problem and the solution the same for Python 2.x?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#31363
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 06 May 2018 11:58:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 31363 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
>> Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 19:47:15 +0800
>>
>> I'm using Python 3.6.5. When I have selected a simple expression (such
>> as 42) then run M-x gud-statement, it fails by saying
>>
>> *** IndentationError: unexpected indent
>>
>> The following changes fix the issue from here.
>
> Thanks. Is the problem and the solution the same for Python 2.x?
Yes, I've checked both of them against Python 2.7.14.
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 06 May 2018 19:49:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 06 May 2018 19:49:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 31363-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
> Cc: 31363 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 19:57:21 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> From: Xu Chunyang <mail <at> xuchunyang.me>
> >> Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 19:47:15 +0800
> >>
> >> I'm using Python 3.6.5. When I have selected a simple expression (such
> >> as 42) then run M-x gud-statement, it fails by saying
> >>
> >> *** IndentationError: unexpected indent
> >>
> >> The following changes fix the issue from here.
> >
> > Thanks. Is the problem and the solution the same for Python 2.x?
>
> Yes, I've checked both of them against Python 2.7.14.
Thanks, pushed to the release branch.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 04 Jun 2018 11:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 20 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.