GNU bug report logs - #31325
27.0.50; PROPOSAL: introduce a new function to recenter without redisplaying the frame

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: John Shahid <jvshahid <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 00:49:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 27.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #73 received at 31325 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: John Shahid <jvshahid <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 31325 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: bug#31325: 27.0.50;
 PROPOSAL: introduce a new function to recenter without redisplaying
 the frame
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:49:49 +0200
John Shahid <jvshahid <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> --- a/doc/lispref/windows.texi
>>> +++ b/doc/lispref/windows.texi
>>> @@ -4154,7 +4154,8 @@ Textual Scrolling
>>>  @code{recenter} puts the line containing point in the middle of the
>>>  window.  If @var{count} is @code{nil} and @var{redisplay} is
>>>  non-@code{nil}, this function may redraw the frame, according to the
>>> -value of @code{recenter-redisplay}.
>>> +value of @code{recenter-redisplay}. Interactive calls pass non-‘nil’
>>> +for @var{redisplay}.              ^^
>>
>> Two spaces between sentences.
>
> Sorry about that, I'm still getting used to using 2 spaces after
> period. How do you spot these ? Do you have some font-lock keyword to
> highlight them. I found checkdoc not to be very useful for checking the
> manual or docstrings in .c files.

You get used to it. One way to check is to put point at the beginning
of the text you changed and seeing if 'M-e' (forward-sentence) does
the expected thing.

Robert




This bug report was last modified 6 years and 322 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.