GNU bug report logs - #31277
[PATCH] cgit changes

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:15:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #20 received at 31277 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Clément Lassieur <clement <at> lassieur.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 31277 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#31277] [PATCH 2/3] services: cgit: Improve handling of
 extra-options.
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 13:19:04 +0200
Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:

> * gnu/services/cgit.scm (serialize-cgit-configuration): Add the extra options,
> one per line, before the scan-path, as this makes it possible to use the
> extra-options to affect the global behaviour for repositories.
> ---
>  gnu/services/cgit.scm | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/services/cgit.scm b/gnu/services/cgit.scm
> index 8ef12cd5a..bacd6ca16 100644
> --- a/gnu/services/cgit.scm
> +++ b/gnu/services/cgit.scm
> @@ -642,13 +642,19 @@ for cgit to allow access to that repository.")
>      (not (memq (configuration-field-name field)
>                 '(project-list
>                   repository-directory
> -                 repositories))))
> +                 repositories
> +                 extra-options))))

                      ---^
Very small nitpick: could you put extra-options between project-list and
repository-directory there?  So that the order is the same with what
comes below.

>    #~(string-append
>       #$(let ((rest (filter rest? cgit-configuration-fields)))
>           (serialize-configuration config rest))
>       #$(serialize-project-list
>          'project-list
>          (cgit-configuration-project-list config))
> +     #$(string-join
> +        (append
> +         (cgit-configuration-extra-options config)
> +         '(""))
> +        "\n")

Could you put the serialization code in a dedicated function?
(e.g. SERIALIZE-EXTRA-OPTION)  So that SERIALIZE-CGIT-CONFIGURATION is
only responsible for the field ordering.

Also, I don't understand why you append '("").  If it's just to make
cgitrc look prettier, I'm not sure it's a good idea.  But maybe I missed
something?

Otherwise LGTM :-)

Clément




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 1 day ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.